Theorem ordtriexmidlem 4608

Description: Lemma for decidability and ordinals. The set {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} is a way of connecting statements about ordinals (such as trichotomy in ordtriexmid 4610 or weak linearity in ordsoexmid 4651) with a proposition 𝜑. Our lemma states that it is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmidlem	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On

Proof of Theorem ordtriexmidlem

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
2		elrabi 2956	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
3		velsn 3683	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ 𝑧 = ∅)
4	2, 3	sylib 122	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑧 = ∅)
5		noel 3495	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ ∅
6		eleq2 2293	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∅))
7	5, 6	mtbiri 679	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
8	4, 7	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
9	8	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
10	1, 9	pm2.21dd 623	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
11	10	gen2 1496	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
12		dftr2 4183	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
13	11, 12	mpbir 146	. . 3 ⊢ Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
14		ssrab2 3309	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
15		ord0 4479	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∅
16		ordsucim 4589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord ∅ → Ord suc ∅)
17	15, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Ord suc ∅
18		suc0 4499	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc ∅ = {∅}
19		ordeq 4460	. . . . 5 ⊢ (suc ∅ = {∅} → (Ord suc ∅ ↔ Ord {∅}))
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord suc ∅ ↔ Ord {∅})
21	17, 20	mpbi 145	. . 3 ⊢ Ord {∅}
22		trssord 4468	. . 3 ⊢ ((Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} ∧ Ord {∅}) → Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
23	13, 14, 21, 22	mp3an 1371	. 2 ⊢ Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
24		p0ex 4271	. . . 4 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
25	24	rabex 4227	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
26	25	elon 4462	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On ↔ Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
27	23, 26	mpbir 146	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1393   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  {crab 2512   ⊆ wss 3197  ∅c0 3491  {csn 3666  Tr wtr 4181  Ord word 4450  Oncon0 4451  suc csuc 4453

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4201  ax-nul 4209  ax-pow 4257

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-uni 3888  df-tr 4182  df-iord 4454  df-on 4456  df-suc 4459

This theorem is referenced by:  ordtriexmid  4610  ontriexmidim  4611  ordtri2orexmid  4612  ontr2exmid  4614  onsucsssucexmid  4616  ordsoexmid  4651  0elsucexmid  4654  ordpwsucexmid  4659  unfiexmid  7068  exmidonfinlem  7359