Theorem ordtriexmidlem 4617

Description: Lemma for decidability and ordinals. The set {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} is a way of connecting statements about ordinals (such as trichotomy in ordtriexmid 4619 or weak linearity in ordsoexmid 4660) with a proposition 𝜑. Our lemma states that it is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmidlem	⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On

Proof of Theorem ordtriexmidlem

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 109	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
2		elrabi 2959	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
3		velsn 3686	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ 𝑧 = ∅)
4	2, 3	sylib 122	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑧 = ∅)
5		noel 3498	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ ∅
6		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∅))
7	5, 6	mtbiri 681	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
8	4, 7	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
9	8	adantl 277	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
10	1, 9	pm2.21dd 625	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
11	10	gen2 1498	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
12		dftr2 4189	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
13	11, 12	mpbir 146	. . 3 ⊢ Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
14		ssrab2 3312	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅}
15		ord0 4488	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ord ∅
16		ordsucim 4598	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord ∅ → Ord suc ∅)
17	15, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Ord suc ∅
18		suc0 4508	. . . . 5 ⊢ suc ∅ = {∅}
19		ordeq 4469	. . . . 5 ⊢ (suc ∅ = {∅} → (Ord suc ∅ ↔ Ord {∅}))
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord suc ∅ ↔ Ord {∅})
21	17, 20	mpbi 145	. . 3 ⊢ Ord {∅}
22		trssord 4477	. . 3 ⊢ ((Tr {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {∅} ∧ Ord {∅}) → Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
23	13, 14, 21, 22	mp3an 1373	. 2 ⊢ Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
24		p0ex 4278	. . . 4 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V
25	24	rabex 4234	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
26	25	elon 4471	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On ↔ Ord {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
27	23, 26	mpbir 146	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1395   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  {crab 2514   ⊆ wss 3200  ∅c0 3494  {csn 3669  Tr wtr 4187  Ord word 4459  Oncon0 4460  suc csuc 4462

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-uni 3894  df-tr 4188  df-iord 4463  df-on 4465  df-suc 4468

This theorem is referenced by:  ordtriexmid  4619  ontriexmidim  4620  ordtri2orexmid  4621  ontr2exmid  4623  onsucsssucexmid  4625  ordsoexmid  4660  0elsucexmid  4663  ordpwsucexmid  4668  unfiexmid  7110  exmidonfinlem  7404