Theorem sbthlemi3 6924

Description: Lemma for isbth 6932. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbthlem.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
sbthlem.2	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbthlemi3	⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝑓   𝑥,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐵(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem sbthlemi3

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbthlem.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		sbthlem.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
3	1, 2	sbthlem2 6923	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
4	1, 2	sbthlem1 6922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
5	3, 4	jctil 310	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
6		eqss 3157	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ↔ (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
7	5, 6	sylibr 133	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
8	7	difeq2d 3240	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
9	8	adantl 275	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
10		imassrn 4957	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔
11		sstr2 3149	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔 → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴)
13		exmidexmid 4175	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
14		dcstab 834	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
15	13, 14	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (EXMID → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
16	15	alrimiv 1862	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
17		dfss4st 3355	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
18	16, 17	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
19	12, 18	syl5ib 153	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
20	19	imp 123	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
21	9, 20	eqtr2d 2199	1 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  STAB wstab 820  DECID wdc 824  ∀wal 1341   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151  Vcvv 2726   ∖ cdif 3113   ⊆ wss 3116  ∪ cuni 3789  EXMIDwem 4173  ran crn 4605   “ cima 4607

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-nul 4108  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-stab 821  df-dc 825  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-eu 2017  df-mo 2018  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-rab 2453  df-v 2728  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-nul 3410  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-uni 3790  df-br 3983  df-opab 4044  df-exmid 4174  df-xp 4610  df-cnv 4612  df-dm 4614  df-rn 4615  df-res 4616  df-ima 4617

This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlemi4  6925  sbthlemi5  6926