Theorem sbthlemi3 7034

Description: Lemma for isbth 7042. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbthlem.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
sbthlem.2	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbthlemi3	⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝑓   𝑥,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐵(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem sbthlemi3

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbthlem.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		sbthlem.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
3	1, 2	sbthlem2 7033	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
4	1, 2	sbthlem1 7032	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
5	3, 4	jctil 312	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
6		eqss 3199	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ↔ (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
7	5, 6	sylibr 134	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
8	7	difeq2d 3282	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
9	8	adantl 277	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
10		imassrn 5021	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔
11		sstr2 3191	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔 → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴)
13		exmidexmid 4230	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
14		dcstab 845	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
15	13, 14	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (EXMID → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
16	15	alrimiv 1888	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
17		dfss4st 3397	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
18	16, 17	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
19	12, 18	imbitrid 154	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
20	19	imp 124	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
21	9, 20	eqtr2d 2230	1 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  STAB wstab 831  DECID wdc 835  ∀wal 1362   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  {cab 2182  Vcvv 2763   ∖ cdif 3154   ⊆ wss 3157  ∪ cuni 3840  EXMIDwem 4228  ran crn 4665   “ cima 4667

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4152  ax-nul 4160  ax-pow 4208  ax-pr 4243

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 832  df-dc 836  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-eu 2048  df-mo 2049  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-ral 2480  df-rex 2481  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-un 3161  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3452  df-pw 3608  df-sn 3629  df-pr 3630  df-op 3632  df-uni 3841  df-br 4035  df-opab 4096  df-exmid 4229  df-xp 4670  df-cnv 4672  df-dm 4674  df-rn 4675  df-res 4676  df-ima 4677

This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlemi4  7035  sbthlemi5  7036