Theorem sbthlemi3 7157

Description: Lemma for isbth 7165. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbthlem.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
sbthlem.2	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbthlemi3	⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝑓   𝑥,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐵(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem sbthlemi3

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbthlem.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		sbthlem.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
3	1, 2	sbthlem2 7156	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
4	1, 2	sbthlem1 7155	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
5	3, 4	jctil 312	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
6		eqss 3242	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ↔ (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
7	5, 6	sylibr 134	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
8	7	difeq2d 3325	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
9	8	adantl 277	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
10		imassrn 5087	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔
11		sstr2 3234	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔 → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴)
13		exmidexmid 4286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
14		dcstab 851	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
15	13, 14	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (EXMID → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
16	15	alrimiv 1922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
17		dfss4st 3440	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
18	16, 17	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
19	12, 18	imbitrid 154	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
20	19	imp 124	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
21	9, 20	eqtr2d 2265	1 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  STAB wstab 837  DECID wdc 841  ∀wal 1395   = wceq 1397   ∈ wcel 2202  {cab 2217  Vcvv 2802   ∖ cdif 3197   ⊆ wss 3200  ∪ cuni 3893  EXMIDwem 4284  ran crn 4726   “ cima 4728

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 838  df-dc 842  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-exmid 4285  df-xp 4731  df-cnv 4733  df-dm 4735  df-rn 4736  df-res 4737  df-ima 4738

This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlemi4  7158  sbthlemi5  7159