Theorem sbthlemi3 6847

Description: Lemma for isbth 6855. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbthlem.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
sbthlem.2	⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbthlemi3	⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,𝑓   𝑥,𝑔

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐵(𝑓,𝑔)   𝐷(𝑓,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem sbthlemi3

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbthlem.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		sbthlem.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}
3	1, 2	sbthlem2 6846	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
4	1, 2	sbthlem1 6845	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
5	3, 4	jctil 310	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
6		eqss 3112	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ↔ (∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ∧ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷))
7	5, 6	sylibr 133	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐷 = (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
8	7	difeq2d 3194	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
9	8	adantl 275	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))))
10		imassrn 4892	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔
11		sstr2 3104	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ ran 𝑔 → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	10, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴)
13		exmidexmid 4120	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (EXMID → DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
14		dcstab 829	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (DECID 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
15	13, 14	syl 14	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (EXMID → STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
16	15	alrimiv 1846	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
17		dfss4st 3309	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦STAB 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
18	16, 17	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
19	12, 18	syl5ib 153	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))))
20	19	imp 123	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))) = (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
21	9, 20	eqtr2d 2173	1 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  STAB wstab 815  DECID wdc 819  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  {cab 2125  Vcvv 2686   ∖ cdif 3068   ⊆ wss 3071  ∪ cuni 3736  EXMIDwem 4118  ran crn 4540   “ cima 4542

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-nul 4054  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-stab 816  df-dc 820  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-rab 2425  df-v 2688  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-nul 3364  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-exmid 4119  df-xp 4545  df-cnv 4547  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-res 4551  df-ima 4552

This theorem is referenced by:  sbthlemi4  6848  sbthlemi5  6849