Theorem isbth 7284

Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here, but the proof as you can see is quite difficult. (The theorem can be proved more easily if we allow AC.) The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 7274 through sbthlemi10 7283; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlemi10 7283. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The proof does require the law of the excluded middle which cannot be avoided as shown at exmidsbthr 17068. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isbth	⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem isbth

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑤 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 535	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
2		simprr 537	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)
3		reldom 7027	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ≼
4	3	brrelex1i 4818	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
5	2, 4	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
6		breq2 4134	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
7		breq1 4133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
8	6, 7	anbi12d 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)))
9		breq2 4134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	imbi12d 234	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)))
11	10	adantl 277	. . 3 ⊢ (((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → (((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)))
12	3	brrelex1i 4818	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
13	1, 12	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
14		breq1 4133	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝑤))
15		breq2 4134	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 ≼ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴))
16	14, 15	anbi12d 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴)))
17		breq1 4133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ≈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤))
18	16, 17	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤)))
19	18	adantl 277	. . . 4 ⊢ (((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐴) → (((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤)))
20		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
21		sseq1 3271	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧))
22		imaeq2 5122	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓 “ 𝑦) = (𝑓 “ 𝑥))
23	22	difeq2d 3347	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥)))
24	23	imaeq2d 5126	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))))
25		difeq2 3341	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))
26	24, 25	sseq12d 3279	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥)))
27	21, 26	anbi12d 477	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))))
28	27	cbvabv 2365	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))}
29		eqid 2238	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 ∖ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 ∖ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))})))
30		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
31	20, 28, 29, 30	sbthlemi10 7283	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧)) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤)
32	31	ex 115	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤))
33	32	adantr 276	. . . 4 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → ((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤))
34	13, 19, 33	vtocld 2875	. . 3 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤))
35	5, 11, 34	vtocld 2875	. 2 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
36	1, 2, 35	mp2and 437	1 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  {cab 2224  Vcvv 2821   ∖ cdif 3217   ∪ cun 3218   ⊆ wss 3220  ∪ cuni 3935   class class class wbr 4130  EXMIDwem 4331  ^◡ccnv 4773   ↾ cres 4776   “ cima 4777   ≈ cen 7020   ≼ cdom 7021

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 843  df-dc 847  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-exmid 4332  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-en 7023  df-dom 7024

This theorem is used by:  exmidsbth  17069