Theorem bnj1127 35487

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1127	⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bnj1127

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		eqid 2762	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		eqid 2762	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
5		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
6		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
7		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)))
8		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
9		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
10		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11		biid 264	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	bnj1128 35486	1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2740  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  [wsbc 3742   ∖ cdif 3899   ⊆ wss 3902  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  ∪ ciun 4954   class class class wbr 5107   E cep 5558  suc csuc 6363   Fn wfn 6532  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7865   ∧ w-bnj17 35183   predc-bnj14 35185   trClc-bnj18 35191

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fn 6540  df-fv 6545  df-om 7866  df-bnj17 35184  df-bnj14 35186  df-bnj18 35192

This theorem is used by:  bnj1125  35488  bnj1136  35493  bnj1413  35531