Theorem bnj1127 33603

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1127	⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bnj1127

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		eqid 2736	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		eqid 2736	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
5		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
6		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
7		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)))
8		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
9		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
10		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11		biid 260	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	bnj1128 33602	1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2713  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3073  [wsbc 3739   ∖ cdif 3907   ⊆ wss 3910  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4586  ∪ ciun 4954   class class class wbr 5105   E cep 5536  suc csuc 6319   Fn wfn 6491  ‘cfv 6496  ωcom 7802   ∧ w-bnj17 33298   predc-bnj14 33300   trClc-bnj18 33306

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5384  ax-un 7672

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3065  df-rex 3074  df-rab 3408  df-v 3447  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3856  df-dif 3913  df-un 3915  df-in 3917  df-ss 3927  df-pss 3929  df-nul 4283  df-if 4487  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4587  df-pr 4589  df-op 4593  df-uni 4866  df-iun 4956  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5223  df-eprel 5537  df-po 5545  df-so 5546  df-fr 5588  df-we 5590  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-lim 6322  df-suc 6323  df-iota 6448  df-fn 6499  df-fv 6504  df-om 7803  df-bnj17 33299  df-bnj14 33301  df-bnj18 33307

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1125  33604  bnj1136  33609  bnj1413  33647