Theorem bnj1127 35005

Description: Property of trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1127	⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem bnj1127

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑖 𝑗 𝑛 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		eqid 2737	. 2 ⊢ (ω ∖ {∅}) = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		eqid 2737	. 2 ⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))} = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅})(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))}
5		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
6		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
7		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑗 E 𝑖 → [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴)))
8		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
9		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
10		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖](𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11		biid 261	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ [𝑗 / 𝑖]((𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))) → (𝑓‘𝑖) ⊆ 𝐴))
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11	bnj1128 35004	1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2714  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  [wsbc 3788   ∖ cdif 3948   ⊆ wss 3951  ∅c0 4333  {csn 4626  ∪ ciun 4991   class class class wbr 5143   E cep 5583  suc csuc 6386   Fn wfn 6556  ‘cfv 6561  ωcom 7887   ∧ w-bnj17 34700   predc-bnj14 34702   trClc-bnj18 34708

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5296  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5432  ax-un 7755

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3437  df-v 3482  df-sbc 3789  df-csb 3900  df-dif 3954  df-un 3956  df-in 3958  df-ss 3968  df-pss 3971  df-nul 4334  df-if 4526  df-pw 4602  df-sn 4627  df-pr 4629  df-op 4633  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4993  df-br 5144  df-opab 5206  df-tr 5260  df-eprel 5584  df-po 5592  df-so 5593  df-fr 5637  df-we 5639  df-ord 6387  df-on 6388  df-lim 6389  df-suc 6390  df-iota 6514  df-fn 6564  df-fv 6569  df-om 7888  df-bnj17 34701  df-bnj14 34703  df-bnj18 34709

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1125  35006  bnj1136  35011  bnj1413  35049