Theorem br1steqg 8044

Description: Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1^st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
br1steqg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem br1steqg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		op1stg 8034	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
2	1	eqeq1d 2765	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
3		fo1st 8042	. . . 4 ⊢ 1st :V⟶ontoV
4		fofn 6817	. . . 4 ⊢ (1st :V⟶ontoV → 1st Fn V)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 1st Fn V
6		opex 5436	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
7		fnbrfvb 6955	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st Fn V ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶))
8	5, 6, 7	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶)
9		eqcom 2770	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)
10	2, 8, 9	3bitr3g 316	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106   Fn wfn 6550  ⟶ontowfo 6553  ‘cfv 6555  1^st c1st 8020

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-fo 6561  df-fv 6563  df-1st 8022

This theorem is used by:  br1steq  36712  fv1stcnv  36718  brxrn  39506