Theorem br1steqg 8011

Description: Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1^st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
br1steqg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem br1steqg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		op1stg 8001	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
2	1	eqeq1d 2764	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
3		fo1st 8009	. . . 4 ⊢ 1st :V–onto→V
4		fofn 6795	. . . 4 ⊢ (1st :V–onto→V → 1st Fn V)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 1st Fn V
6		opex 5443	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
7		fnbrfvb 6932	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st Fn V ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶))
8	5, 6, 7	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶)
9		eqcom 2769	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)
10	2, 8, 9	3bitr3g 316	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3453  ⟨cop 4593   class class class wbr 5107   Fn wfn 6532  –onto→wfo 6535  ‘cfv 6537  1^st c1st 7987

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fo 6543  df-fv 6545  df-1st 7989

This theorem is used by:  br1steq  36337  fv1stcnv  36343  brxrn  39118