Theorem br1steqg 8006

Description: Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1^st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
br1steqg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem br1steqg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		op1stg 7996	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
2	1	eqeq1d 2764	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
3		fo1st 8004	. . . 4 ⊢ 1st :V–onto→V
4		fofn 6794	. . . 4 ⊢ (1st :V–onto→V → 1st Fn V)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 1st Fn V
6		opex 5444	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
7		fnbrfvb 6931	. . 3 ⊢ ((1st Fn V ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V) → ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶))
8	5, 6, 7	mp2an 704	. 2 ⊢ ((1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶)
9		eqcom 2769	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)
10	2, 8, 9	3bitr3g 316	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454  ⟨cop 4594   class class class wbr 5108   Fn wfn 6531  –onto→wfo 6534  ‘cfv 6536  1^st c1st 7982

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-fo 6542  df-fv 6544  df-1st 7984

This theorem is used by:  br1steq  36271  fv1stcnv  36277  brxrn  39060