Theorem br2ndeqg 8011

Description: Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2^nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
br2ndeqg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem br2ndeqg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		op2ndg 8001	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵)
2	1	eqeq1d 2767	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
3		fo2nd 8009	. . . 4 ⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V
4		fofn 6798	. . . 4 ⊢ (2nd :V–onto→V → 2nd Fn V)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 2nd Fn V
6		opex 5447	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
7		fnbrfvb 6935	. . 3 ⊢ ((2nd Fn V ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V) → ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶))
8	5, 6, 7	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶)
9		eqcom 2772	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵)
10	2, 8, 9	3bitr3g 316	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3457  ⟨cop 4597   class class class wbr 5111   Fn wfn 6535  –onto→wfo 6538  ‘cfv 6540  2^nd c2nd 7987

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fo 6546  df-fv 6548  df-2nd 7989

This theorem is used by:  br2ndeq  36277  fv2ndcnv  36283  brxrn  39065