Theorem br2ndeqg 8022

Description: Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2^nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
br2ndeqg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem br2ndeqg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		op2ndg 8012	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵)
2	1	eqeq1d 2763	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
3		fo2nd 8020	. . . 4 ⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V
4		fofn 6796	. . . 4 ⊢ (2nd :V–onto→V → 2nd Fn V)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 2nd Fn V
6		opex 5432	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V
7		fnbrfvb 6933	. . 3 ⊢ ((2nd Fn V ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ V) → ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶))
8	5, 6, 7	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ ((2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶)
9		eqcom 2768	. 2 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵)
10	2, 8, 9	3bitr3g 316	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103   Fn wfn 6532  –onto→wfo 6535  ‘cfv 6537  2^nd c2nd 7998

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fo 6543  df-fv 6545  df-2nd 8000

This theorem is used by:  br2ndeq  36516  fv2ndcnv  36522  brxrn  39295