Theorem disjsuc2 39549

Description: Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjsuc2	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣   𝑢,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑉(𝑣)

Proof of Theorem disjsuc2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		disjressuc2 39546	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅)))
2		disjecxrncnvep 39548	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
3	2	el2v1 39364	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
4	3	ralbidv 3189	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
5	4	anbi2d 642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
6	1, 5	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ∩ cin 4092   ∪ cun 4152  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588   E cep 5555  ^◡ccnv 5655  [cec 8746   ⋉ cxrn 39309

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7778  ax-reg 9616

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-eprel 5556  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-fo 6567  df-fv 6569  df-1st 8028  df-2nd 8029  df-ec 8750  df-xrn 39515

This theorem is used by:  disjsuc  39994