Theorem disjsuc2 39104

Description: Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
disjsuc2	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣   𝑢,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑉(𝑣)

Proof of Theorem disjsuc2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		disjressuc2 39101	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅)))
2		disjecxrncnvep 39103	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
3	2	el2v1 38919	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
4	3	ralbidv 3191	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
5	4	anbi2d 642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
6	1, 5	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3082  Vcvv 3458   ∪ cun 3906   ∩ cin 3907  ∅c0 4289  {csn 4594   E cep 5565  ^◡ccnv 5665  [cec 8701   ⋉ cxrn 38864

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745  ax-reg 9564

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-eprel 5566  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fo 6549  df-fv 6551  df-1st 7995  df-2nd 7996  df-ec 8705  df-xrn 39070

This theorem is used by:  disjsuc  39549