Theorem foco2 6965

Description: If a composition of two functions is surjective, then the function on the left is surjective. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
foco2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Proof of Theorem foco2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		foelrn 6964	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧))
2		ffvelrn 6941	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵)
3		fvco3 6849	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
4		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐺‘𝑧) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
5	4	rspceeqv 3567	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 583	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
7		eqeq1 2742	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	7	rexbidv 3225	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 246	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
10	9	rexlimdva 3212	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
12	11	impl 455	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	ralrimiva 3107	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	anim2i 616	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)) → (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
15		3anass 1093	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)))
16		dffo3 6960	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
17	14, 15, 16	3imtr4i 291	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064   ∘ ccom 5584  ⟶wf 6414  –onto→wfo 6416  ‘cfv 6418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-fo 6424  df-fv 6426

This theorem is referenced by:  fcoresfo  44452