Theorem foco2 6850

Description: If a composition of two functions is surjective, then the function on the left is surjective. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
foco2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Proof of Theorem foco2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		foelrn 6849	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧))
2		ffvelrn 6826	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵)
3		fvco3 6737	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
4		fveq2 6645	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐺‘𝑧) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
5	4	rspceeqv 3586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 587	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
7		eqeq1 2802	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	7	rexbidv 3256	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
10	9	rexlimdva 3243	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
12	11	impl 459	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	ralrimiva 3149	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	anim2i 619	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)) → (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
15		3anass 1092	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)))
16		dffo3 6845	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
17	14, 15, 16	3imtr4i 295	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3106  ∃wrex 3107   ∘ ccom 5523  ⟶wf 6320  –onto→wfo 6322  ‘cfv 6324

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-id 5425  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-res 5531  df-ima 5532  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-fo 6330  df-fv 6332

This theorem is referenced by: (None)