Theorem foco2 7081

Description: If a composition of two functions is surjective, then the function on the left is surjective. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
foco2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Proof of Theorem foco2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		foelrn 7079	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧))
2		ffvelcdm 7053	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵)
3		fvco3 6960	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
4		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐺‘𝑧) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
5	4	rspceeqv 3611	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 584	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
7		eqeq1 2733	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	7	rexbidv 3157	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 247	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
10	9	rexlimdva 3134	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
12	11	impl 455	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	ralrimiva 3125	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	anim2i 617	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)) → (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
15		3anass 1094	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)))
16		dffo3 7074	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
17	14, 15, 16	3imtr4i 292	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044  ∃wrex 3053   ∘ ccom 5642  ⟶wf 6507  –onto→wfo 6509  ‘cfv 6511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-fo 6517  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by:  fcoresfo  47072