Theorem foco2 6873

Description: If a composition of two functions is surjective, then the function on the left is surjective. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
foco2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Proof of Theorem foco2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		foelrn 6872	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧))
2		ffvelrn 6849	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵)
3		fvco3 6760	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
4		fveq2 6670	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐺‘𝑧) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
5	4	rspceeqv 3638	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 586	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
7		eqeq1 2825	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	7	rexbidv 3297	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 249	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
10	9	rexlimdva 3284	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
12	11	impl 458	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	ralrimiva 3182	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	anim2i 618	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)) → (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
15		3anass 1091	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)))
16		dffo3 6868	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
17	14, 15, 16	3imtr4i 294	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3138  ∃wrex 3139   ∘ ccom 5559  ⟶wf 6351  –onto→wfo 6353  ‘cfv 6355

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-res 5567  df-ima 5568  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-fo 6361  df-fv 6363

This theorem is referenced by: (None)