Theorem foco2 6645

Description: If a composition of two functions is surjective, then the function on the left is surjective. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 16-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 14-Jul-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
foco2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Proof of Theorem foco2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		foelrn 6644	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧))
2		ffvelrn 6623	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵)
3		fvco3 6537	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
4		fveq2 6448	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐺‘𝑧) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧)))
5	4	rspceeqv 3529	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑧) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑧))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	2, 3, 5	syl2anc 579	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
7		eqeq1 2782	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
8	7	rexbidv 3237	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
9	6, 8	syl5ibrcom 239	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
10	9	rexlimdva 3213	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)‘𝑧) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	1, 10	syl5 34	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
12	11	impl 449	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
13	12	ralrimiva 3148	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥))
14	13	anim2i 610	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)) → (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
15		3anass 1079	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶)))
16		dffo3 6640	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)))
17	14, 15, 16	3imtr4i 284	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴–onto→𝐶) → 𝐹:𝐵–onto→𝐶)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 386   ∧ w3a 1071   = wceq 1601   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3090  ∃wrex 3091   ∘ ccom 5361  ⟶wf 6133  –onto→wfo 6135  ‘cfv 6137

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2055  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2150  ax-12 2163  ax-13 2334  ax-ext 2754  ax-sep 5019  ax-nul 5027  ax-pow 5079  ax-pr 5140

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-3an 1073  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-mo 2551  df-eu 2587  df-clab 2764  df-cleq 2770  df-clel 2774  df-nfc 2921  df-ne 2970  df-ral 3095  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3099  df-v 3400  df-sbc 3653  df-dif 3795  df-un 3797  df-in 3799  df-ss 3806  df-nul 4142  df-if 4308  df-sn 4399  df-pr 4401  df-op 4405  df-uni 4674  df-br 4889  df-opab 4951  df-mpt 4968  df-id 5263  df-xp 5363  df-rel 5364  df-cnv 5365  df-co 5366  df-dm 5367  df-rn 5368  df-res 5369  df-ima 5370  df-iota 6101  df-fun 6139  df-fn 6140  df-f 6141  df-fo 6143  df-fv 6145

This theorem is referenced by: (None)