Theorem idladdcl 38553

Description: Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21360 and lidlacl 21320 instead. An ideal is closed under addition. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
idladdcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idladdcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idladdcl

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idladdcl.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑅) = (2nd ‘𝑅)
3		eqid 2769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
4		eqid 2769	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GId‘𝐺) = (GId‘𝐺)
5	1, 2, 3, 4	isidl 38548	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (GId‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑧) ∈ 𝐼)))))
6	5	biimpa 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → (𝐼 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (GId‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑧) ∈ 𝐼))))
7	6	simp3d 1160	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑧) ∈ 𝐼)))
8		simpl 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑧) ∈ 𝐼)) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
9	8	ralimi 3108	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑧(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑥) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑥(2nd ‘𝑅)𝑧) ∈ 𝐼)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
10	7, 9	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
11		oveq1 7415	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝐴𝐺𝑦))
12	11	eleq1d 2854	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝐴𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼))
13		oveq2 7416	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐺𝑦) = (𝐴𝐺𝐵))
14	13	eleq1d 2854	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
15	12, 14	rspc2v 3601	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥𝐺𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
16	10, 15	mpan9 515	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085   ⊆ wss 3913  ran crn 5660  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7408  1^st c1st 7980  2^nd c2nd 7981  GIdcgi 30779  RingOpscrngo 38428  Idlcidl 38541

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7411  df-idl 38544

This theorem is referenced by:  idlsubcl  38557  intidl  38563  unichnidl  38565