Theorem idlsubcl 38937

Description: Obsolete theorem, use 2idllidld 21540 and lidlsubcl 21496 instead. An ideal is closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlsubcl.2	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlsubcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlsubcl.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2761	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlcl 38931	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
4	1, 2	idlcl 38931	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5	3, 4	anim12dan 631	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺))
6		eqid 2761	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
7		idlsubcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
8	1, 2, 6, 7	rngosub 38844	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
9	8	3expb 1138	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
10	9	adantlr 728	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
11	5, 10	syldan 603	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
12		simprl 783	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)
13	1, 6	idlnegcl 38936	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
14	13	adantrl 729	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
15	12, 14	jca 521	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
16	1	idladdcl 38933	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
17	15, 16	syldan 603	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
18	11, 17	eqeltrd 2861	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ran crn 5652  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418  1^st c1st 7997  invcgn 31086   /_𝑔 cgs 31087  RingOpscrngo 38808  Idlcidl 38921

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7375  df-ov 7421  df-oprab 7422  df-mpo 7423  df-1st 7999  df-2nd 8000  df-grpo 31088  df-gid 31089  df-ginv 31090  df-gdiv 31091  df-ablo 31140  df-ass 38757  df-exid 38759  df-mgmOLD 38763  df-sgrOLD 38775  df-mndo 38781  df-rngo 38809  df-idl 38924

This theorem is used by: (None)