Theorem idlsubcl 38224

Description: An ideal is closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlsubcl.2	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlsubcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlsubcl.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2736	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlcl 38218	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
4	1, 2	idlcl 38218	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5	3, 4	anim12dan 619	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺))
6		eqid 2736	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
7		idlsubcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
8	1, 2, 6, 7	rngosub 38131	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
9	8	3expb 1120	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
10	9	adantlr 715	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
11	5, 10	syldan 591	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
12		simprl 770	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)
13	1, 6	idlnegcl 38223	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
14	13	adantrl 716	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
15	12, 14	jca 511	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
16	1	idladdcl 38220	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
17	15, 16	syldan 591	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
18	11, 17	eqeltrd 2836	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  ran crn 5625  ‘cfv 6492  (class class class)co 7358  1^st c1st 7931  invcgn 30566   /_𝑔 cgs 30567  RingOpscrngo 38095  Idlcidl 38208

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5224  ax-sep 5241  ax-nul 5251  ax-pow 5310  ax-pr 5377  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-sbc 3741  df-csb 3850  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-in 3908  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-pw 4556  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-iun 4948  df-br 5099  df-opab 5161  df-mpt 5180  df-id 5519  df-xp 5630  df-rel 5631  df-cnv 5632  df-co 5633  df-dm 5634  df-rn 5635  df-res 5636  df-ima 5637  df-iota 6448  df-fun 6494  df-fn 6495  df-f 6496  df-f1 6497  df-fo 6498  df-f1o 6499  df-fv 6500  df-riota 7315  df-ov 7361  df-oprab 7362  df-mpo 7363  df-1st 7933  df-2nd 7934  df-grpo 30568  df-gid 30569  df-ginv 30570  df-gdiv 30571  df-ablo 30620  df-ass 38044  df-exid 38046  df-mgmOLD 38050  df-sgrOLD 38062  df-mndo 38068  df-rngo 38096  df-idl 38211

This theorem is referenced by: (None)