Theorem idlsubcl 38390

Description: An ideal is closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
idlsubcl.2	⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
idlsubcl	⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Proof of Theorem idlsubcl

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idlsubcl.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐺 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	idlcl 38384	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺)
4	1, 2	idlcl 38384	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)
5	3, 4	anim12dan 625	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺))
6		eqid 2739	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inv‘𝐺) = (inv‘𝐺)
7		idlsubcl.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( /𝑔 ‘𝐺)
8	1, 2, 6, 7	rngosub 38297	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
9	8	3expb 1126	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
10	9	adantlr 721	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
11	5, 10	syldan 597	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)))
12		simprl 776	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐼)
13	1, 6	idlnegcl 38389	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
14	13	adantrl 722	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)
15	12, 14	jca 516	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼))
16	1	idladdcl 38386	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ ((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
17	15, 16	syldan 597	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐺((inv‘𝐺)‘𝐵)) ∈ 𝐼)
18	11, 17	eqeltrd 2839	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ RingOps ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝐴𝐷𝐵) ∈ 𝐼)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ran crn 5619  ‘cfv 6485  (class class class)co 7356  1^st c1st 7929  invcgn 30580   /_𝑔 cgs 30581  RingOpscrngo 38261  Idlcidl 38374

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5199  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5228  ax-pow 5294  ax-pr 5362  ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rmo 3344  df-reu 3345  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-sbc 3724  df-csb 3832  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-pw 4531  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-iun 4923  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5513  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625  df-cnv 5626  df-co 5627  df-dm 5628  df-rn 5629  df-res 5630  df-ima 5631  df-iota 6441  df-fun 6487  df-fn 6488  df-f 6489  df-f1 6490  df-fo 6491  df-f1o 6492  df-fv 6493  df-riota 7313  df-ov 7359  df-oprab 7360  df-mpo 7361  df-1st 7931  df-2nd 7932  df-grpo 30582  df-gid 30583  df-ginv 30584  df-gdiv 30585  df-ablo 30634  df-ass 38210  df-exid 38212  df-mgmOLD 38216  df-sgrOLD 38228  df-mndo 38234  df-rngo 38262  df-idl 38377

This theorem is referenced by: (None)