Theorem isarep2 6225

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 6223. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 5682	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2		resopab 5698	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
3	2	imaeq1i 5719	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2804	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5		funopab 6172	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	6	rspec 3113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8		nfv 1957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
9	8	mo3 2580	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	7, 9	sylibr 226	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11		moanimv 2654	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
12	10, 11	mpbir 223	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1843	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15	14	funimaex 6223	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2855	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
18	17	isseti 3411	1 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 386  ∀wal 1599   = wceq 1601  ∃wex 1823  [wsb 2011   ∈ wcel 2107  ∃*wmo 2549  ∀wral 3090  Vcvv 3398  {copab 4950   ↾ cres 5359   “ cima 5360  Fun wfun 6131

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2055  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2150  ax-12 2163  ax-13 2334  ax-ext 2754  ax-rep 5008  ax-sep 5019  ax-nul 5027  ax-pr 5140

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-3an 1073  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-mo 2551  df-eu 2587  df-clab 2764  df-cleq 2770  df-clel 2774  df-nfc 2921  df-ral 3095  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3099  df-v 3400  df-dif 3795  df-un 3797  df-in 3799  df-ss 3806  df-nul 4142  df-if 4308  df-sn 4399  df-pr 4401  df-op 4405  df-br 4889  df-opab 4951  df-id 5263  df-xp 5363  df-rel 5364  df-cnv 5365  df-co 5366  df-dm 5367  df-rn 5368  df-res 5369  df-ima 5370  df-fun 6139

This theorem is referenced by: (None)