Theorem isarep2 6633

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 6630. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 6007	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2		resopab 6026	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
3	2	imaeq1i 6049	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2761	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5		funopab 6576	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	6	rspec 3237	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8		nfv 1914	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
9	8	mo3 2564	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	7, 9	sylibr 234	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11		moanimv 2619	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
12	10, 11	mpbir 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1799	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15	14	funimaex 6630	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2831	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
18	17	isseti 3482	1 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779  [wsb 2065   ∈ wcel 2109  ∃*wmo 2538  ∀wral 3052  Vcvv 3464  {copab 5186   ↾ cres 5661   “ cima 5662  Fun wfun 6530

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5254  ax-sep 5271  ax-nul 5281  ax-pr 5407

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2886  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-br 5125  df-opab 5187  df-id 5553  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-fun 6538

This theorem is referenced by: (None)