Theorem isarep2 6669

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 6666. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 6044	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2		resopab 6063	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
3	2	imaeq1i 6086	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2770	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5		funopab 6613	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	6	rspec 3256	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8		nfv 1913	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
9	8	mo3 2567	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	7, 9	sylibr 234	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11		moanimv 2622	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
12	10, 11	mpbir 231	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1797	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15	14	funimaex 6666	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2840	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
18	17	isseti 3506	1 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777  [wsb 2064   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃*wmo 2541  ∀wral 3067  Vcvv 3488  {copab 5228   ↾ cres 5702   “ cima 5703  Fun wfun 6567

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5303  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-fun 6575

This theorem is referenced by: (None)