Theorem isarep2 6632

Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 6629. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isarep2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isarep2	⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resima 6008	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2		resopab 6027	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
3	2	imaeq1i 6049	. . . 4 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	eqtr3i 2756	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5		funopab 6576	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		isarep2.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
7	6	rspec 3241	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8		nfv 1909	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
9	8	mo3 2552	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
10	7, 9	sylibr 233	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11		moanimv 2609	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
12	10, 11	mpbir 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
13	5, 12	mpgbir 1793	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
14		isarep2.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
15	14	funimaex 6629	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
16	13, 15	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
17	4, 16	eqeltri 2823	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
18	17	isseti 3484	1 ⊢ ∃𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1531   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773  [wsb 2059   ∈ wcel 2098  ∃*wmo 2526  ∀wral 3055  Vcvv 3468  {copab 5203   ↾ cres 5671   “ cima 5672  Fun wfun 6530

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-fun 6538

This theorem is referenced by: (None)