Theorem lnrot2 28379

Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
btwnlng1.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
btwnlng1.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
lnrot2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
lnrot2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lnrot2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Proof of Theorem lnrot2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lnrot2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
2		btwnlng1.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2726	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		btwnlng1.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		btwnlng1.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		btwnlng1.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
7		btwnlng1.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
8		btwnlng1.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	tgbtwncomb 28244	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
10		biidd 262	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
11	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 7	tgbtwncomb 28244	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12	9, 10, 11	3orbi123d 1431	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))))
13		3orrot 1089	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
14	12, 13	bitr4di 289	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
15		btwnlng1.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
16		lnrot2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)
17	2, 15, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 7	tgellng 28308	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋))))
18		btwnlng1.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
19	2, 15, 4, 5, 7, 6, 18, 8	tgellng 28308	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
20	14, 17, 19	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)))
21	1, 20	mpbid 231	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 1083   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2934  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7404  Basecbs 17151  distcds 17213  TarskiGcstrkg 28182  Itvcitv 28188  LineGclng 28189

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-iota 6488  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7407  df-oprab 7408  df-mpo 7409  df-trkgc 28203  df-trkgb 28204  df-trkgcb 28205  df-trkg 28208

This theorem is referenced by:  coltr  28402  mideulem2  28489