Theorem lnrot2 26985

Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
btwnlng1.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
btwnlng1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
btwnlng1.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
btwnlng1.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
lnrot2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
lnrot2.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lnrot2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Proof of Theorem lnrot2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lnrot2.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))
2		btwnlng1.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2738	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
4		btwnlng1.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		btwnlng1.g	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		btwnlng1.y	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
7		btwnlng1.x	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
8		btwnlng1.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	tgbtwncomb 26850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
10		biidd 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
11	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 7	tgbtwncomb 26850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12	9, 10, 11	3orbi123d 1434	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))))
13		3orrot 1091	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
14	12, 13	bitr4di 289	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
15		btwnlng1.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
16		lnrot2.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)
17	2, 15, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, 7	tgellng 26914	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋))))
18		btwnlng1.d	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
19	2, 15, 4, 5, 7, 6, 18, 8	tgellng 26914	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
20	14, 17, 19	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)))
21	1, 20	mpbid 231	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2943  ‘cfv 6433  (class class class)co 7275  Basecbs 16912  distcds 16971  TarskiGcstrkg 26788  Itvcitv 26794  LineGclng 26795

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-trkgc 26809  df-trkgb 26810  df-trkgcb 26811  df-trkg 26814

This theorem is referenced by:  coltr  27008  mideulem2  27095