![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lnrot1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
btwnlng1.p | ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) |
btwnlng1.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
btwnlng1.l | ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) |
btwnlng1.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
btwnlng1.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) |
btwnlng1.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) |
btwnlng1.z | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) |
btwnlng1.d | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) |
lnrot1.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋)) |
lnrot1.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
lnrot1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | lnrot1.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋)) | |
2 | btwnlng1.p | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) | |
3 | eqid 2736 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺) | |
4 | btwnlng1.i | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) | |
5 | btwnlng1.g | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) | |
6 | btwnlng1.y | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) | |
7 | btwnlng1.z | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) | |
8 | btwnlng1.x | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) | |
9 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 | tgbtwncomb 27431 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))) |
10 | biidd 261 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))) | |
11 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8 | tgbtwncomb 27431 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))) |
12 | 9, 10, 11 | 3orbi123d 1435 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) |
13 | 3orrot 1092 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))) | |
14 | 13 | a1i 11 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋)))) |
15 | btwnlng1.l | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) | |
16 | btwnlng1.d | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | |
17 | 2, 15, 4, 5, 8, 6, 16, 7 | tgellng 27495 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) |
18 | 12, 14, 17 | 3bitr4rd 311 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))) |
19 | lnrot1.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋) | |
20 | 2, 15, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 6 | tgellng 27495 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))) |
21 | 18, 20 | bitr4d 281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋))) |
22 | 1, 21 | mpbird 256 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∨ w3o 1086 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2106 ≠ wne 2943 ‘cfv 6496 (class class class)co 7357 Basecbs 17083 distcds 17142 TarskiGcstrkg 27369 Itvcitv 27375 LineGclng 27376 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5256 ax-nul 5263 ax-pr 5384 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 846 df-3or 1088 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2567 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-ral 3065 df-rex 3074 df-rab 3408 df-v 3447 df-sbc 3740 df-dif 3913 df-un 3915 df-in 3917 df-ss 3927 df-nul 4283 df-if 4487 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4587 df-pr 4589 df-op 4593 df-uni 4866 df-br 5106 df-opab 5168 df-id 5531 df-xp 5639 df-rel 5640 df-cnv 5641 df-co 5642 df-dm 5643 df-iota 6448 df-fun 6498 df-fv 6504 df-ov 7360 df-oprab 7361 df-mpo 7362 df-trkgc 27390 df-trkgb 27391 df-trkgcb 27392 df-trkg 27395 |
This theorem is referenced by: tglineelsb2 27574 tglineneq 27586 coltr3 27590 hlperpnel 27667 opphllem4 27692 lmieu 27726 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |