| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lnrot1 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| btwnlng1.p | ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) |
| btwnlng1.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
| btwnlng1.l | ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) |
| btwnlng1.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| btwnlng1.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) |
| btwnlng1.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) |
| btwnlng1.z | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) |
| btwnlng1.d | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) |
| lnrot1.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋)) |
| lnrot1.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lnrot1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | lnrot1.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋)) | |
| 2 | btwnlng1.p | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) | |
| 3 | eqid 2764 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺) | |
| 4 | btwnlng1.i | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) | |
| 5 | btwnlng1.g | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) | |
| 6 | btwnlng1.y | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) | |
| 7 | btwnlng1.z | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) | |
| 8 | btwnlng1.x | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) | |
| 9 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 | tgbtwncomb 28660 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))) |
| 10 | biidd 264 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))) | |
| 11 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 6, 8 | tgbtwncomb 28660 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))) |
| 12 | 9, 10, 11 | 3orbi123d 1458 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) |
| 13 | 3orrot 1104 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a1i 11 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋)))) |
| 15 | btwnlng1.l | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) | |
| 16 | btwnlng1.d | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | |
| 17 | 2, 15, 4, 5, 8, 6, 16, 7 | tgellng 28724 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))) |
| 18 | 12, 14, 17 | 3bitr4rd 314 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))) |
| 19 | lnrot1.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋) | |
| 20 | 2, 15, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 6 | tgellng 28724 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ↔ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐼𝑋) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))) |
| 21 | 18, 20 | bitr4d 284 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋))) |
| 22 | 1, 21 | mpbird 259 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∨ w3o 1098 = wceq 1562 ∈ wcel 2144 ≠ wne 2959 ‘cfv 6523 (class class class)co 7398 Basecbs 17247 distcds 17297 TarskiGcstrkg 28598 Itvcitv 28604 LineGclng 28605 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1817 ax-4 1831 ax-5 1932 ax-6 1989 ax-7 2030 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2214 ax-ext 2736 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5258 ax-pr 5392 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3or 1100 df-3an 1101 df-tru 1565 df-fal 1575 df-ex 1802 df-nf 1806 df-sb 2093 df-mo 2568 df-eu 2598 df-clab 2743 df-cleq 2756 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rab 3417 df-v 3458 df-sbc 3747 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4288 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-br 5103 df-opab 5165 df-id 5544 df-xp 5655 df-rel 5656 df-cnv 5657 df-co 5658 df-dm 5659 df-iota 6479 df-fun 6525 df-fv 6531 df-ov 7401 df-oprab 7402 df-mpo 7403 df-trkgc 28619 df-trkgb 28620 df-trkgcb 28621 df-trkg 28624 |
| This theorem is referenced by: tglineelsb2 28803 tglineneq 28816 coltr3 28820 hlperpnel 28900 opphllem4 28925 lmieu 28959 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |