Theorem tgellng 26818

Description: Property of lying on the line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. We choose the notation 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋(LineG‘𝐺)𝑌) instead of "colinear" because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
tgellng.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgellng	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgellng

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tgellng.z	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
2		tglngval.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		tglngval.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
4		tglngval.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		tglngval.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
7		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
8		tglngval.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
9	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	tglngval 26816	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))})
10	9	eleq2d 2824	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))}))
11		eleq1 2826	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12		oveq1 7262	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧𝐼𝑌) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
13	12	eleq2d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
14		oveq2 7263	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋𝐼𝑧) = (𝑋𝐼𝑍))
15	14	eleq2d 2824	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	11, 13, 15	3orbi123d 1433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17	16	elrab 3617	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))} ↔ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
18	10, 17	bitrdi 286	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))))
19	1, 18	mpbirand 703	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∨ w3o 1084   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942  {crab 3067  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  Basecbs 16840  TarskiGcstrkg 26693  Itvcitv 26699  LineGclng 26700

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-trkg 26718

This theorem is referenced by:  tgcolg  26819  hlln  26872  lnhl  26880  btwnlng1  26884  btwnlng2  26885  btwnlng3  26886  lncom  26887  lnrot1  26888  lnrot2  26889  tglineeltr  26896  colmid  26953  cgracol  27093