Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  tgellng Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem tgellng 26361
 Description: Property of lying on the line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. We choose the notation 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋(LineG‘𝐺)𝑌) instead of "colinear" because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
tglngval.p 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g (𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x (𝜑𝑋𝑃)
tglngval.y (𝜑𝑌𝑃)
tglngval.z (𝜑𝑋𝑌)
tgellng.z (𝜑𝑍𝑃)
Assertion
Ref Expression
tgellng (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgellng
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 tgellng.z . 2 (𝜑𝑍𝑃)
2 tglngval.p . . . . 5 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3 tglngval.l . . . . 5 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
4 tglngval.i . . . . 5 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5 tglngval.g . . . . 5 (𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6 tglngval.x . . . . 5 (𝜑𝑋𝑃)
7 tglngval.y . . . . 5 (𝜑𝑌𝑃)
8 tglngval.z . . . . 5 (𝜑𝑋𝑌)
92, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8tglngval 26359 . . . 4 (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑧𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))})
109eleq2d 2875 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {𝑧𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))}))
11 eleq1 2877 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12 oveq1 7147 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧𝐼𝑌) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
1312eleq2d 2875 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
14 oveq2 7148 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋𝐼𝑧) = (𝑋𝐼𝑍))
1514eleq2d 2875 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
1611, 13, 153orbi123d 1432 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
1716elrab 3628 . . 3 (𝑍 ∈ {𝑧𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))} ↔ (𝑍𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
1810, 17syl6bb 290 . 2 (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))))
191, 18mpbirand 706 1 (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∨ w3o 1083   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  {crab 3110  ‘cfv 6327  (class class class)co 7140  Basecbs 16482  TarskiGcstrkg 26238  Itvcitv 26244  LineGclng 26245 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5168  ax-nul 5175  ax-pr 5296 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4802  df-br 5032  df-opab 5094  df-id 5426  df-xp 5526  df-rel 5527  df-cnv 5528  df-co 5529  df-dm 5530  df-iota 6286  df-fun 6329  df-fv 6335  df-ov 7143  df-oprab 7144  df-mpo 7145  df-trkg 26261 This theorem is referenced by:  tgcolg  26362  hlln  26415  lnhl  26423  btwnlng1  26427  btwnlng2  26428  btwnlng3  26429  lncom  26430  lnrot1  26431  lnrot2  26432  tglineeltr  26439  colmid  26496  cgracol  26636
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator