Theorem tgellng 28526

Description: Property of lying on the line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. We choose the notation 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋(LineG‘𝐺)𝑌) instead of "colinear" because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
tgellng.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgellng	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgellng

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tgellng.z	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
2		tglngval.p	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
3		tglngval.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
4		tglngval.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.g	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
6		tglngval.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
7		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
8		tglngval.z	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
9	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	tglngval 28524	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))})
10	9	eleq2d 2817	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))}))
11		eleq1 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)))
12		oveq1 7348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑧𝐼𝑌) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
13	12	eleq2d 2817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌)))
14		oveq2 7349	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑋𝐼𝑧) = (𝑋𝐼𝑍))
15	14	eleq2d 2817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	11, 13, 15	3orbi123d 1437	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑍 → ((𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17	16	elrab 3642	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))} ↔ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
18	10, 17	bitrdi 287	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))))
19	1, 18	mpbirand 707	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∨ w3o 1085   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2928  {crab 3395  ‘cfv 6476  (class class class)co 7341  Basecbs 17115  TarskiGcstrkg 28400  Itvcitv 28406  LineGclng 28407

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5229  ax-nul 5239  ax-pr 5365

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4279  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4572  df-pr 4574  df-op 4578  df-uni 4855  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-id 5506  df-xp 5617  df-rel 5618  df-cnv 5619  df-co 5620  df-dm 5621  df-iota 6432  df-fun 6478  df-fv 6484  df-ov 7344  df-oprab 7345  df-mpo 7346  df-trkg 28426

This theorem is referenced by:  tgcolg  28527  hlln  28580  lnhl  28588  btwnlng1  28592  btwnlng2  28593  btwnlng3  28594  lncom  28595  lnrot1  28596  lnrot2  28597  tglineeltr  28604  colmid  28661  cgracol  28801