Theorem ordelordALT 45266

Description: An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 6382 using the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 9585. dford2 is a weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the Axiom of Regularity. ordelordALT 45266 is ordelordALTVD 45595 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ordelordALTVD 45595 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordelordALT	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ordelordALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordtr 6374	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴)
2	1	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐴)
3		dford2 9585	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
4	3	simprbi 502	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
5	4	adantr 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
6		3orcomb 1110	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
7	6	2ralbii 3140	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
8	5, 7	sylib 221	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
9		simpr 489	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
10		tratrb 45265	. . 3 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
11	2, 8, 9, 10	syl3anc 1398	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
12		trss 5228	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
13	2, 9, 12	sylc 66	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
14		ssralv2 45260	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
15	14	ex 417	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))))
16	13, 13, 5, 15	syl3c 67	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
17		dford2 9585	. 2 ⊢ (Ord 𝐵 ↔ (Tr 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)))
18	11, 16, 17	sylanbrc 594	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ w3o 1102   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079   ⊆ wss 3905  Tr wtr 5218  Ord word 6359

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732  ax-reg 9550

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-tp 4594  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-tr 5219  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-ord 6363

This theorem is referenced by: (None)