P. 426 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 42501-42600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	jm3.1lem3 42501	Lemma for jm3.1 42502. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	jm3.1 42502	Diophantine expression for exponentiation. Lemma 3.1 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 698. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐾↑𝑁) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) mod ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1)))
Theorem	expdiophlem1 42503*	Lemma for expdioph 42505. Fully expanded expression for exponential. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝐴↑𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑑 = (𝐴 Yrm (𝐵 + 1))) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑑 Yrm 𝐵)) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑓 = (𝑑 Xrm 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐶 < ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∧ ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∥ ((𝑓 − ((𝑑 − 𝐴) · 𝑒)) − 𝐶))))))))
Theorem	expdiophlem2 42504	Lemma for expdioph 42505. Exponentiation on a restricted domain is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘2) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
Theorem	expdioph 42505	The exponential function is Diophantine. This result completes and encapsulates our development using Pell equation solution sequences and is sometimes regarded as Matiyasevich's theorem properly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
21.31.35  Uncategorized stuff not associated with a major project
Theorem	setindtr 42506*	Set induction for sets contained in a transitive set. If we are allowed to assume Infinity, then all sets have a transitive closure and this reduces to setind 9752; however, this version is useful without Infinity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦(Tr 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	setindtrs 42507*	Set induction scheme without Infinity. See comments at setindtr 42506. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑧(Tr 𝑧 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝜒)
Theorem	dford3lem1 42508*	Lemma for dford3 42510. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑦) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 (Tr 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 Tr 𝑦))
Theorem	dford3lem2 42509*	Lemma for dford3 42510. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ On)
Theorem	dford3 42510*	Ordinals are precisely the hereditarily transitive classes. Definition 1.2 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ (Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑥))
Theorem	dford4 42511*	dford3 42510 expressed in primitives to demonstrate shortness. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏∀𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑎) → (𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎))))
Theorem	wopprc 42512	Unrelated: Wiener pairs treat proper classes symmetrically. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ ¬ 1o ∈ {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}})
Theorem	rpnnen3lem 42513*	Lemma for rpnnen3 42514. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑎 < 𝑏) → {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑎} ≠ {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑏})
Theorem	rpnnen3 42514	Dedekind cut injection of ℝ into 𝒫 ℚ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ℝ ≼ 𝒫 ℚ
21.31.36  More equivalents of the Axiom of Choice
Theorem	axac10 42515	Characterization of choice similar to dffin1-5 10406. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ( ≈ “ On) = V
Theorem	harinf 42516	The Hartogs number of an infinite set is at least ω. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ω ⊆ (har‘𝑆))
Theorem	wdom2d2 42517*	Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	ttac 42518	Tarski's theorem about choice: infxpidm 10580 is equivalent to ax-ac 10477. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑐(ω ≼ 𝑐 → (𝑐 × 𝑐) ≈ 𝑐))
Theorem	pw2f1ocnv 42519*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 9097, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦, 1o, ∅)))))
Theorem	pw2f1o2 42520*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 9097, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2f1o2val 42521*	Function value of the pw2f1o2 42520 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (◡𝑋 “ {1o}))
Theorem	pw2f1o2val2 42522*	Membership in a mapped set under the pw2f1o2 42520 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑋‘𝑌) = 1o))
Theorem	soeq12d 42523	Equality deduction for total orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
Theorem	freq12d 42524	Equality deduction for founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵))
Theorem	weeq12d 42525	Equality deduction for well-orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
Theorem	limsuc2 42526	Limit ordinals in the sense inclusive of zero contain all successors of their members. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwsolem 42527*	Transfer an ordering on characteristic functions by isomorphism to the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐹 Isom 𝑈, 𝑇 ((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwso 42528*	A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch1 42529*	Define an enumeration of a set from a choice function; second part, it restricts to a bijection. EDITORIAL: overlaps dfac8a 10048. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch2 42530*	Define an enumeration (weak dominance version) of a set from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dnnumch3lem 42531*	Value of the ordinal injection function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}))‘𝑤) = ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤}))
Theorem	dnnumch3 42532*	Define an injection from a set into the ordinals using a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥})):𝐴–1-1→On)
Theorem	dnwech 42533*	Define a well-ordering from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑣}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤})}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 We 𝐴)
Theorem	fnwe2val 42534*	Lemma for fnwe2 42538. Substitute variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑏) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆𝑏)))
Theorem	fnwe2lem1 42535*	Lemma for fnwe2 42538. Substitution in well-ordering hypothesis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑎)})
Theorem	fnwe2lem2 42536*	Lemma for fnwe2 42538. An element which is in a minimal fiber and minimal within its fiber is minimal globally; thus 𝑇 is well-founded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑇𝑏)
Theorem	fnwe2lem3 42537*	Lemma for fnwe2 42538. Trichotomy. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏 ∨ 𝑏𝑇𝑎))
Theorem	fnwe2 42538*	A well-ordering can be constructed on a partitioned set by patching together well-orderings on each partition using a well-ordering on the partitions themselves. Similar to fnwe 8130 but does not require the within-partition ordering to be globally well. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴)
Theorem	aomclem1 42539*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. This is the beginning of the proof that multiple choice is equivalent to choice. Our goal is to construct, by transfinite recursion, a well-ordering of (𝑅1‘𝐴). In what follows, 𝐴 is the index of the rank we wish to well-order, 𝑧 is the collection of well-orderings constructed so far, dom 𝑧 is the set of ordinal indices of constructed ranks i.e. the next rank to construct, and 𝑦 is a postulated multiple-choice function. Successor case 1, define a simple ordering from the well-ordered predecessor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 Or (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem2 42540*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Successor case 2, a choice function for subsets of (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑎))
Theorem	aomclem3 42541*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Successor case 3, our required well-ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem4 42542*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Limit case. Patch together well-orderings constructed so far using fnwe2 42538 to cover the limit rank. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem5 42543*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Combine the successor case with the limit case. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem6 42544*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Transfinite induction, close over 𝑧. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝐴) We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem7 42545*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. (𝑅1‘𝐴) is well-orderable. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem8 42546*	Lemma for dfac11 42547. Perform variable substitutions. This is the most we can say without invoking regularity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	dfac11 42547*	The right-hand side of this theorem (compare with ac4 10493), sometimes known as the "axiom of multiple choice", is a choice equivalent. Curiously, this statement cannot be proved without ax-reg 9610, despite not mentioning the cumulative hierarchy in any way as most consequences of regularity do. This is definition (MC) of [Schechter] p. 141. EDITORIAL: the proof is not original with me of course but I lost my reference sometime after writing it. A multiple choice function allows any total order to be extended to a choice function, which in turn defines a well-ordering. Since a well-ordering on a set defines a simple ordering of the power set, this allows the trivial well-ordering of the empty set to be transfinitely bootstrapped up the cumulative hierarchy to any desired level. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑧 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))
Theorem	kelac1 42548*	Kelley's choice, basic form: if a collection of sets can be cast as closed sets in the factors of a topology, and there is a definable element in each topology (which need not be in the closed set - if it were this would be trivial), then compactness (via finite intersection) guarantees that the final product is nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑈 ∈ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽)) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	kelac2lem 42549	Lemma for kelac2 42550 and dfac21 42551: knob topologies are compact. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}) ∈ Comp)
Theorem	kelac2 42550*	Kelley's choice, most common form: compactness of a product of knob topologies recovers choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}))) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dfac21 42551	Tychonoff's theorem is a choice equivalent. Definition AC21 of Schechter p. 461. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑓⟶Comp → (∏t‘𝑓) ∈ Comp))
21.31.37  Finitely generated left modules
Syntax	clfig 42552	Extend class notation with the class of finitely generated left modules.
class LFinGen
Definition	df-lfig 42553	Define the class of finitely generated left modules. Finite generation of subspaces can be intepreted using ↾s. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ LFinGen = {𝑤 ∈ LMod ∣ (Base‘𝑤) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝑤) “ (𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∩ Fin))}
Theorem	islmodfg 42554*	Property of a finitely generated left module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → (𝑊 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵(𝑏 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	islssfg 42555*	Property of a finitely generated left (sub)module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈(𝑏 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝑈)))
Theorem	islssfg2 42556*	Property of a finitely generated left (sub)module, with a relaxed constraint on the spanning vectors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)(𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝑈))
Theorem	islssfgi 42557	Finitely spanned subspaces are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s (𝑁‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → 𝑋 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	fglmod 42558	Finitely generated left modules are left modules. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LFinGen → 𝑀 ∈ LMod)
Theorem	lsmfgcl 42559	The sum of two finitely generated submodules is finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑊 ↾s (𝐴 ⊕ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ LFinGen)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LFinGen)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ LFinGen)
21.31.38  Noetherian left modules I
Syntax	clnm 42560	Extend class notation with the class of Noetherian left modules.
class LNoeM
Definition	df-lnm 42561*	A left-module is Noetherian iff it is hereditarily finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Dec-2014.)
⊢ LNoeM = {𝑤 ∈ LMod ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)(𝑤 ↾s 𝑖) ∈ LFinGen}
Theorem	islnm 42562*	Property of being a Noetherian left module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LNoeM ↔ (𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑀 ↾s 𝑖) ∈ LFinGen))
Theorem	islnm2 42563*	Property of being a Noetherian left module with finite generation expanded in terms of spans. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LNoeM ↔ (𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝑖 = (𝑁‘𝑔)))
Theorem	lnmlmod 42564	A Noetherian left module is a left module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LNoeM → 𝑀 ∈ LMod)
Theorem	lnmlssfg 42565	A submodule of Noetherian module is finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑀 ↾s 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LNoeM ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	lnmlsslnm 42566	All submodules of a Noetherian module are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑀 ↾s 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LNoeM ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	lnmfg 42567	A Noetherian left module is finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LNoeM → 𝑀 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	kercvrlsm 42568	The domain of a linear function is the subspace sum of the kernel and any subspace which covers the range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (LSubSp‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐷) = ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ⊕ 𝐷) = 𝐵)
Theorem	lmhmfgima 42569	A homomorphism maps finitely generated submodules to finitely generated submodules. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑇 ↾s (𝐹 “ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (LSubSp‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ LFinGen)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	lnmepi 42570	Epimorphic images of Noetherian modules are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LNoeM ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵) → 𝑇 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	lmhmfgsplit 42571	If the kernel and range of a homomorphism of left modules are finitely generated, then so is the domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑇 ↾s ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ LFinGen ∧ 𝑉 ∈ LFinGen) → 𝑆 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	lmhmlnmsplit 42572	If the kernel and range of a homomorphism of left modules are Noetherian, then so is the domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (◡𝐹 “ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝑇 ↾s ran 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 LMHom 𝑇) ∧ 𝑈 ∈ LNoeM ∧ 𝑉 ∈ LNoeM) → 𝑆 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	lnmlmic 42573	Noetherian is an invariant property of modules. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ≃𝑚 𝑆 → (𝑅 ∈ LNoeM ↔ 𝑆 ∈ LNoeM))
21.31.39  Addenda for structure powers
Theorem	pwssplit4 42574*	Splitting for structure powers 4: maps isomorphically onto the other half. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑅 ↑s (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (Base‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 ∣ (𝑦 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 × { 0 })}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ (𝑥 ↾ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑅 ↑s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑅 ↑s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐸 ↾s 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐿 LMIso 𝐷))
Theorem	filnm 42575	Finite left modules are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → 𝑊 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	pwslnmlem0 42576	Zeroeth powers are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑊 ↑s ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑌 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	pwslnmlem1 42577*	First powers are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑊 ↑s {𝑖})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LNoeM → 𝑌 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	pwslnmlem2 42578	A sum of powers is Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↑s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑊 ↑s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑊 ↑s (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ LNoeM)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ LNoeM)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	pwslnm 42579	Finite powers of Noetherian modules are Noetherian. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑊 ↑s 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LNoeM ∧ 𝐼 ∈ Fin) → 𝑌 ∈ LNoeM)
21.31.40  Every set admits a group structure iff choice
Theorem	unxpwdom3 42580*	Weaker version of unxpwdom 9607 where a function is required only to be cancellative, not an injection. 𝐷 and 𝐵 are to be thought of as "large" "horizonal" sets, the others as "small". Because the operator is row-wise injective, but the whole row cannot inject into 𝐴, each row must hit an element of 𝐵; by column injectivity, each row can be identified in at least one way by the 𝐵 element that it hits and the column in which it is hit. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jul-2015.) MOVABLE
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑎 + 𝑏) ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐷)) → ((𝑎 + 𝑏) = (𝑎 + 𝑐) ↔ 𝑏 = 𝑐))    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑐 + 𝑑) = (𝑎 + 𝑑) ↔ 𝑐 = 𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐷 ≼ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≼* (𝐷 × 𝐵))
Theorem	pwfi2f1o 42581*	The pw2f1o 9095 bijection relates finitely supported indicator functions on a two-element set to finite subsets. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑦 finSupp ∅}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:𝑆–1-1-onto→(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	pwfi2en 42582*	Finitely supported indicator functions are equinumerous to finite subsets. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑦 finSupp ∅}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ≈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	frlmpwfi 42583	Formal linear combinations over Z/2Z are equivalent to finite subsets. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Jun-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℤ/nℤ‘2)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑅 freeLMod 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 ≈ (𝒫 𝐼 ∩ Fin))
Theorem	gicabl 42584	Being Abelian is a group invariant. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝐺 ≃𝑔 𝐻 → (𝐺 ∈ Abel ↔ 𝐻 ∈ Abel))
Theorem	imasgim 42585	A relabeling of the elements of a group induces an isomorphism to the relabeled group. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 GrpIso 𝑈))
Theorem	isnumbasgrplem1 42586	A set which is equipollent to the base set of a definable Abelian group is the base set of some (relabeled) Abelian group. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ (Base “ Abel))
Theorem	harn0 42587	The Hartogs number of a set is never zero. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (har‘𝑆) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	numinfctb 42588	A numerable infinite set contains a countable subset. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom card ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ω ≼ 𝑆)
Theorem	isnumbasgrplem2 42589	If the (to be thought of as disjoint, although the proof does not require this) union of a set and its Hartogs number supports a group structure (more generally, a cancellative magma), then the set must be numerable. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∪ (har‘𝑆)) ∈ (Base “ Grp) → 𝑆 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	isnumbasgrplem3 42590	Every nonempty numerable set can be given the structure of an Abelian group, either a finite cyclic group or a vector space over Z/2Z. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → 𝑆 ∈ (Base “ Abel))
Theorem	isnumbasabl 42591	A set is numerable iff it and its Hartogs number can be jointly given the structure of an Abelian group. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ dom card ↔ (𝑆 ∪ (har‘𝑆)) ∈ (Base “ Abel))
Theorem	isnumbasgrp 42592	A set is numerable iff it and its Hartogs number can be jointly given the structure of a group. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ dom card ↔ (𝑆 ∪ (har‘𝑆)) ∈ (Base “ Grp))
Theorem	dfacbasgrp 42593	A choice equivalent in abstract algebra: All nonempty sets admit a group structure. From http://mathoverflow.net/a/12988. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ (Base “ Grp) = (V ∖ {∅}))
21.31.41  Noetherian rings and left modules II
Syntax	clnr 42594	Extend class notation with the class of left Noetherian rings.
class LNoeR
Definition	df-lnr 42595	A ring is left-Noetherian iff it is Noetherian as a left module over itself. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ LNoeR = {𝑎 ∈ Ring ∣ (ringLMod‘𝑎) ∈ LNoeM}
Theorem	islnr 42596	Property of a left-Noetherian ring. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LNoeR ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Ring ∧ (ringLMod‘𝐴) ∈ LNoeM))
Theorem	lnrring 42597	Left-Noetherian rings are rings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LNoeR → 𝐴 ∈ Ring)
Theorem	lnrlnm 42598	Left-Noetherian rings have Noetherian associated modules. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ LNoeR → (ringLMod‘𝐴) ∈ LNoeM)
Theorem	islnr2 42599*	Property of being a left-Noetherian ring in terms of finite generation of ideals (the usual "pure ring theory" definition). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (RSpan‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ LNoeR ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑈 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)𝑖 = (𝑁‘𝑔)))
Theorem	islnr3 42600	Relate left-Noetherian rings to Noetherian-type closure property of the left ideal system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ LNoeR ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝐵)))