Theorem 2idlval 14506

Description: Definition of a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2idlval.i	|- I = (LIdeal ` R )
2idlval.o	|- O = (oppr ` R )
2idlval.j	|- J = (LIdeal ` O )
2idlval.t	|- T = (2Ideal ` R )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2idlval	|- T = ( I i^i J )

Proof of Theorem 2idlval

Dummy variables x r are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2idlval.t	. . . 4 |- T = (2Ideal ` R )
2	1	2idlmex 14505	. . 3 |- ( x e. T -> R e. _V )
3		elinel1 3391	. . . 4 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> x e. I )
4		2idlval.i	. . . . 5 |- I = (LIdeal ` R )
5	4	lidlmex 14479	. . . 4 |- ( x e. I -> R e. _V )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> R e. _V )
7		lidlex 14477	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( R e. _V -> (LIdeal ` R ) e. _V )
8	4, 7	eqeltrid 2316	. . . . . . 7 |- ( R e. _V -> I e. _V )
9		inex1g 4223	. . . . . . 7 |- ( I e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
10	8, 9	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( R e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
11		fveq2 5635	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = (LIdeal ` R ) )
12	11, 4	eqtr4di 2280	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = I )
13		fveq2 5635	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = (oppr ` R ) )
14		2idlval.o	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- O = (oppr ` R )
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2280	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = O )
16	15	fveq2d 5639	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = (LIdeal ` O ) )
17		2idlval.j	. . . . . . . . 9 |- J = (LIdeal ` O )
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2280	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = J )
19	12, 18	ineq12d 3407	. . . . . . 7 |- ( r = R -> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) = ( I i^i J ) )
20		df-2idl 14504	. . . . . . 7 |- 2Ideal = ( r e. _V |-> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) )
21	19, 20	fvmptg 5718	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( R e. _V /\ ( I i^i J ) e. _V ) -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
22	10, 21	mpdan 421	. . . . 5 |- ( R e. _V -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2274	. . . 4 |- ( R e. _V -> T = ( I i^i J ) )
24	23	eleq2d 2299	. . 3 |- ( R e. _V -> ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) ) )
25	2, 6, 24	pm5.21nii 709	. 2 |- ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) )
26	25	eqriv 2226	1 |- T = ( I i^i J )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   _Vcvv 2800   i^i cin 3197   ` cfv 5324  opp_rcoppr 14070  LIdealclidl 14471  2Idealc2idl 14503

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-coll 4202  ax-sep 4205  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633  ax-cnex 8113  ax-resscn 8114  ax-1re 8116  ax-addrcl 8119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-reu 2515  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-sbc 3030  df-csb 3126  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-int 3927  df-iun 3970  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-mpt 4150  df-id 4388  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-rn 4734  df-res 4735  df-ima 4736  df-iota 5284  df-fun 5326  df-fn 5327  df-f 5328  df-f1 5329  df-fo 5330  df-f1o 5331  df-fv 5332  df-ov 6016  df-oprab 6017  df-mpo 6018  df-inn 9134  df-2 9192  df-3 9193  df-4 9194  df-5 9195  df-6 9196  df-7 9197  df-8 9198  df-ndx 13075  df-slot 13076  df-base 13078  df-sets 13079  df-iress 13080  df-mulr 13164  df-sca 13166  df-vsca 13167  df-ip 13168  df-lssm 14357  df-sra 14439  df-rgmod 14440  df-lidl 14473  df-2idl 14504

This theorem is referenced by: (None)