Theorem 2idlval 14776

Description: Definition of a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2idlval.i	|- I = (LIdeal ` R )
2idlval.o	|- O = (oppr ` R )
2idlval.j	|- J = (LIdeal ` O )
2idlval.t	|- T = (2Ideal ` R )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2idlval	|- T = ( I i^i J )

Proof of Theorem 2idlval

Dummy variables x r are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2idlval.t	. . . 4 |- T = (2Ideal ` R )
2	1	2idlmex 14775	. . 3 |- ( x e. T -> R e. _V )
3		elinel1 3409	. . . 4 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> x e. I )
4		2idlval.i	. . . . 5 |- I = (LIdeal ` R )
5	4	lidlmex 14749	. . . 4 |- ( x e. I -> R e. _V )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> R e. _V )
7		lidlex 14747	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( R e. _V -> (LIdeal ` R ) e. _V )
8	4, 7	eqeltrid 2321	. . . . . . 7 |- ( R e. _V -> I e. _V )
9		inex1g 4251	. . . . . . 7 |- ( I e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
10	8, 9	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( R e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
11		fveq2 5675	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = (LIdeal ` R ) )
12	11, 4	eqtr4di 2285	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = I )
13		fveq2 5675	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = (oppr ` R ) )
14		2idlval.o	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- O = (oppr ` R )
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2285	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = O )
16	15	fveq2d 5679	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = (LIdeal ` O ) )
17		2idlval.j	. . . . . . . . 9 |- J = (LIdeal ` O )
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2285	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = J )
19	12, 18	ineq12d 3427	. . . . . . 7 |- ( r = R -> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) = ( I i^i J ) )
20		df-2idl 14774	. . . . . . 7 |- 2Ideal = ( r e. _V |-> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) )
21	19, 20	fvmptg 5758	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( R e. _V /\ ( I i^i J ) e. _V ) -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
22	10, 21	mpdan 421	. . . . 5 |- ( R e. _V -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2279	. . . 4 |- ( R e. _V -> T = ( I i^i J ) )
24	23	eleq2d 2304	. . 3 |- ( R e. _V -> ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) ) )
25	2, 6, 24	pm5.21nii 712	. 2 |- ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) )
26	25	eqriv 2231	1 |- T = ( I i^i J )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2205   _Vcvv 2815   i^i cin 3213   ` cfv 5357  opp_rcoppr 14310  LIdealclidl 14741  2Idealc2idl 14773

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-coll 4230  ax-sep 4233  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664  ax-cnex 8234  ax-resscn 8235  ax-1re 8237  ax-addrcl 8240

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-csb 3142  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-int 3955  df-iun 3998  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-id 4419  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-res 4766  df-ima 4767  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-f1 5362  df-fo 5363  df-f1o 5364  df-fv 5365  df-ov 6061  df-oprab 6062  df-mpo 6063  df-inn 9255  df-2 9313  df-3 9314  df-4 9315  df-5 9316  df-6 9317  df-7 9318  df-8 9319  df-ndx 13299  df-slot 13300  df-base 13302  df-sets 13303  df-iress 13304  df-mulr 13388  df-sca 13390  df-vsca 13391  df-ip 13392  df-lssm 14627  df-sra 14709  df-rgmod 14710  df-lidl 14743  df-2idl 14774

This theorem is referenced by: (None)