Theorem 2idlval 14182

Description: Definition of a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2idlval.i	|- I = (LIdeal ` R )
2idlval.o	|- O = (oppr ` R )
2idlval.j	|- J = (LIdeal ` O )
2idlval.t	|- T = (2Ideal ` R )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2idlval	|- T = ( I i^i J )

Proof of Theorem 2idlval

Dummy variables x r are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2idlval.t	. . . 4 |- T = (2Ideal ` R )
2	1	2idlmex 14181	. . 3 |- ( x e. T -> R e. _V )
3		elinel1 3358	. . . 4 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> x e. I )
4		2idlval.i	. . . . 5 |- I = (LIdeal ` R )
5	4	lidlmex 14155	. . . 4 |- ( x e. I -> R e. _V )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> R e. _V )
7		lidlex 14153	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( R e. _V -> (LIdeal ` R ) e. _V )
8	4, 7	eqeltrid 2291	. . . . . . 7 |- ( R e. _V -> I e. _V )
9		inex1g 4179	. . . . . . 7 |- ( I e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
10	8, 9	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( R e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
11		fveq2 5570	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = (LIdeal ` R ) )
12	11, 4	eqtr4di 2255	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = I )
13		fveq2 5570	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = (oppr ` R ) )
14		2idlval.o	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- O = (oppr ` R )
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2255	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = O )
16	15	fveq2d 5574	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = (LIdeal ` O ) )
17		2idlval.j	. . . . . . . . 9 |- J = (LIdeal ` O )
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2255	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = J )
19	12, 18	ineq12d 3374	. . . . . . 7 |- ( r = R -> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) = ( I i^i J ) )
20		df-2idl 14180	. . . . . . 7 |- 2Ideal = ( r e. _V |-> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) )
21	19, 20	fvmptg 5649	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( R e. _V /\ ( I i^i J ) e. _V ) -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
22	10, 21	mpdan 421	. . . . 5 |- ( R e. _V -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2249	. . . 4 |- ( R e. _V -> T = ( I i^i J ) )
24	23	eleq2d 2274	. . 3 |- ( R e. _V -> ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) ) )
25	2, 6, 24	pm5.21nii 705	. 2 |- ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) )
26	25	eqriv 2201	1 |- T = ( I i^i J )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1372   e. wcel 2175   _Vcvv 2771   i^i cin 3164   ` cfv 5268  opp_rcoppr 13747  LIdealclidl 14147  2Idealc2idl 14179

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-13 2177  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-coll 4158  ax-sep 4161  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252  ax-un 4478  ax-setind 4583  ax-cnex 7998  ax-resscn 7999  ax-1re 8001  ax-addrcl 8004

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-fal 1378  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ne 2376  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-reu 2490  df-rab 2492  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-csb 3093  df-dif 3167  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-int 3885  df-iun 3928  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-mpt 4106  df-id 4338  df-xp 4679  df-rel 4680  df-cnv 4681  df-co 4682  df-dm 4683  df-rn 4684  df-res 4685  df-ima 4686  df-iota 5229  df-fun 5270  df-fn 5271  df-f 5272  df-f1 5273  df-fo 5274  df-f1o 5275  df-fv 5276  df-ov 5937  df-oprab 5938  df-mpo 5939  df-inn 9019  df-2 9077  df-3 9078  df-4 9079  df-5 9080  df-6 9081  df-7 9082  df-8 9083  df-ndx 12754  df-slot 12755  df-base 12757  df-sets 12758  df-iress 12759  df-mulr 12842  df-sca 12844  df-vsca 12845  df-ip 12846  df-lssm 14033  df-sra 14115  df-rgmod 14116  df-lidl 14149  df-2idl 14180

This theorem is referenced by: (None)