Theorem 2idlval 14339

Description: Definition of a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2idlval.i	|- I = (LIdeal ` R )
2idlval.o	|- O = (oppr ` R )
2idlval.j	|- J = (LIdeal ` O )
2idlval.t	|- T = (2Ideal ` R )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2idlval	|- T = ( I i^i J )

Proof of Theorem 2idlval

Dummy variables x r are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2idlval.t	. . . 4 |- T = (2Ideal ` R )
2	1	2idlmex 14338	. . 3 |- ( x e. T -> R e. _V )
3		elinel1 3363	. . . 4 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> x e. I )
4		2idlval.i	. . . . 5 |- I = (LIdeal ` R )
5	4	lidlmex 14312	. . . 4 |- ( x e. I -> R e. _V )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> R e. _V )
7		lidlex 14310	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( R e. _V -> (LIdeal ` R ) e. _V )
8	4, 7	eqeltrid 2293	. . . . . . 7 |- ( R e. _V -> I e. _V )
9		inex1g 4188	. . . . . . 7 |- ( I e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
10	8, 9	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( R e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
11		fveq2 5589	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = (LIdeal ` R ) )
12	11, 4	eqtr4di 2257	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = I )
13		fveq2 5589	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = (oppr ` R ) )
14		2idlval.o	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- O = (oppr ` R )
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2257	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = O )
16	15	fveq2d 5593	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = (LIdeal ` O ) )
17		2idlval.j	. . . . . . . . 9 |- J = (LIdeal ` O )
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2257	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = J )
19	12, 18	ineq12d 3379	. . . . . . 7 |- ( r = R -> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) = ( I i^i J ) )
20		df-2idl 14337	. . . . . . 7 |- 2Ideal = ( r e. _V |-> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) )
21	19, 20	fvmptg 5668	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( R e. _V /\ ( I i^i J ) e. _V ) -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
22	10, 21	mpdan 421	. . . . 5 |- ( R e. _V -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2251	. . . 4 |- ( R e. _V -> T = ( I i^i J ) )
24	23	eleq2d 2276	. . 3 |- ( R e. _V -> ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) ) )
25	2, 6, 24	pm5.21nii 706	. 2 |- ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) )
26	25	eqriv 2203	1 |- T = ( I i^i J )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2177   _Vcvv 2773   i^i cin 3169   ` cfv 5280  opp_rcoppr 13904  LIdealclidl 14304  2Idealc2idl 14336

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2179  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-coll 4167  ax-sep 4170  ax-pow 4226  ax-pr 4261  ax-un 4488  ax-setind 4593  ax-cnex 8036  ax-resscn 8037  ax-1re 8039  ax-addrcl 8042

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ne 2378  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-reu 2492  df-rab 2494  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3003  df-csb 3098  df-dif 3172  df-un 3174  df-in 3176  df-ss 3183  df-pw 3623  df-sn 3644  df-pr 3645  df-op 3647  df-uni 3857  df-int 3892  df-iun 3935  df-br 4052  df-opab 4114  df-mpt 4115  df-id 4348  df-xp 4689  df-rel 4690  df-cnv 4691  df-co 4692  df-dm 4693  df-rn 4694  df-res 4695  df-ima 4696  df-iota 5241  df-fun 5282  df-fn 5283  df-f 5284  df-f1 5285  df-fo 5286  df-f1o 5287  df-fv 5288  df-ov 5960  df-oprab 5961  df-mpo 5962  df-inn 9057  df-2 9115  df-3 9116  df-4 9117  df-5 9118  df-6 9119  df-7 9120  df-8 9121  df-ndx 12910  df-slot 12911  df-base 12913  df-sets 12914  df-iress 12915  df-mulr 12998  df-sca 13000  df-vsca 13001  df-ip 13002  df-lssm 14190  df-sra 14272  df-rgmod 14273  df-lidl 14306  df-2idl 14337

This theorem is referenced by: (None)