Theorem 2idlval 14581

Description: Definition of a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2idlval.i	|- I = (LIdeal ` R )
2idlval.o	|- O = (oppr ` R )
2idlval.j	|- J = (LIdeal ` O )
2idlval.t	|- T = (2Ideal ` R )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2idlval	|- T = ( I i^i J )

Proof of Theorem 2idlval

Dummy variables x r are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2idlval.t	. . . 4 |- T = (2Ideal ` R )
2	1	2idlmex 14580	. . 3 |- ( x e. T -> R e. _V )
3		elinel1 3395	. . . 4 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> x e. I )
4		2idlval.i	. . . . 5 |- I = (LIdeal ` R )
5	4	lidlmex 14554	. . . 4 |- ( x e. I -> R e. _V )
6	3, 5	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( x e. ( I i^i J ) -> R e. _V )
7		lidlex 14552	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( R e. _V -> (LIdeal ` R ) e. _V )
8	4, 7	eqeltrid 2318	. . . . . . 7 |- ( R e. _V -> I e. _V )
9		inex1g 4230	. . . . . . 7 |- ( I e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
10	8, 9	syl 14	. . . . . 6 |- ( R e. _V -> ( I i^i J ) e. _V )
11		fveq2 5648	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = (LIdeal ` R ) )
12	11, 4	eqtr4di 2282	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` r ) = I )
13		fveq2 5648	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = (oppr ` R ) )
14		2idlval.o	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- O = (oppr ` R )
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2282	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( r = R -> (oppr ` r ) = O )
16	15	fveq2d 5652	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = (LIdeal ` O ) )
17		2idlval.j	. . . . . . . . 9 |- J = (LIdeal ` O )
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2282	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( r = R -> (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) = J )
19	12, 18	ineq12d 3411	. . . . . . 7 |- ( r = R -> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) = ( I i^i J ) )
20		df-2idl 14579	. . . . . . 7 |- 2Ideal = ( r e. _V |-> ( (LIdeal ` r ) i^i (LIdeal ` (oppr ` r ) ) ) )
21	19, 20	fvmptg 5731	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( R e. _V /\ ( I i^i J ) e. _V ) -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
22	10, 21	mpdan 421	. . . . 5 |- ( R e. _V -> (2Ideal ` R ) = ( I i^i J ) )
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2276	. . . 4 |- ( R e. _V -> T = ( I i^i J ) )
24	23	eleq2d 2301	. . 3 |- ( R e. _V -> ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) ) )
25	2, 6, 24	pm5.21nii 712	. 2 |- ( x e. T <-> x e. ( I i^i J ) )
26	25	eqriv 2228	1 |- T = ( I i^i J )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1398   e. wcel 2202   _Vcvv 2803   i^i cin 3200   ` cfv 5333  opp_rcoppr 14144  LIdealclidl 14546  2Idealc2idl 14578

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-coll 4209  ax-sep 4212  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-setind 4641  ax-cnex 8166  ax-resscn 8167  ax-1re 8169  ax-addrcl 8172

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ne 2404  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-reu 2518  df-rab 2520  df-v 2805  df-sbc 3033  df-csb 3129  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-uni 3899  df-int 3934  df-iun 3977  df-br 4094  df-opab 4156  df-mpt 4157  df-id 4396  df-xp 4737  df-rel 4738  df-cnv 4739  df-co 4740  df-dm 4741  df-rn 4742  df-res 4743  df-ima 4744  df-iota 5293  df-fun 5335  df-fn 5336  df-f 5337  df-f1 5338  df-fo 5339  df-f1o 5340  df-fv 5341  df-ov 6031  df-oprab 6032  df-mpo 6033  df-inn 9186  df-2 9244  df-3 9245  df-4 9246  df-5 9247  df-6 9248  df-7 9249  df-8 9250  df-ndx 13148  df-slot 13149  df-base 13151  df-sets 13152  df-iress 13153  df-mulr 13237  df-sca 13239  df-vsca 13240  df-ip 13241  df-lssm 14432  df-sra 14514  df-rgmod 14515  df-lidl 14548  df-2idl 14579

This theorem is referenced by: (None)