Theorem dvdsrpropdg 14454

Description: The divisibility relation depends only on the ring's base set and multiplication operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dvdsrpropdg.1	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
dvdsrpropdg.2	|- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
dvdsrpropdg.3	|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) )
dvdsrpropdg.k	|- ( ph -> K e. SRing )
dvdsrpropdg.l	|- ( ph -> L e. SRing )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvdsrpropdg	|- ( ph -> ( ||r ` K ) = ( ||r ` L ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, B   x, K, y   x, L, y   ph, x, y

Proof of Theorem dvdsrpropdg

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dvdsrpropdg.3	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) ) -> ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) )
2	1	anassrs 404	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) /\ y e. B ) -> ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) )
3	2	eqeq1d 2247	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) /\ y e. B ) -> ( ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z <-> ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) )
4	3	an32s 574	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) /\ x e. B ) -> ( ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z <-> ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) )
5	4	rexbidva 2547	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ y e. B ) -> ( E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z <-> E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) )
6	5	pm5.32da 456	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( ( y e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) <-> ( y e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) ) )
7		dvdsrpropdg.1	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` K ) )
8	7	eleq2d 2308	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( y e. B <-> y e. ( Base ` K ) ) )
9	7	rexeqdv 2756	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z <-> E. x e. ( Base ` K ) ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) )
10	8, 9	anbi12d 477	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( ( y e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) <-> ( y e. ( Base ` K ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` K ) ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) ) )
11		dvdsrpropdg.2	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B = ( Base ` L ) )
12	11	eleq2d 2308	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( y e. B <-> y e. ( Base ` L ) ) )
13	11	rexeqdv 2756	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z <-> E. x e. ( Base ` L ) ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) )
14	12, 13	anbi12d 477	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( ( y e. B /\ E. x e. B ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) <-> ( y e. ( Base ` L ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` L ) ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) ) )
15	6, 10, 14	3bitr3d 218	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ( y e. ( Base ` K ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` K ) ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) <-> ( y e. ( Base ` L ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` L ) ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) ) )
16	15	opabbidv 4197	. 2 |- ( ph -> { <. y , z >. | ( y e. ( Base ` K ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` K ) ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) } = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. ( Base ` L ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` L ) ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) } )
17		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Base ` K ) = ( Base ` K ) )
18		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ||r ` K ) = ( ||r ` K ) )
19		dvdsrpropdg.k	. . 3 |- ( ph -> K e. SRing )
20		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( .r ` K ) = ( .r ` K ) )
21	17, 18, 19, 20	dvdsrvald 14400	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ||r ` K ) = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. ( Base ` K ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` K ) ( x ( .r ` K ) y ) = z ) } )
22		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( Base ` L ) = ( Base ` L ) )
23		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( ||r ` L ) = ( ||r ` L ) )
24		dvdsrpropdg.l	. . 3 |- ( ph -> L e. SRing )
25		eqidd 2239	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( .r ` L ) = ( .r ` L ) )
26	22, 23, 24, 25	dvdsrvald 14400	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ||r ` L ) = { <. y , z >. | ( y e. ( Base ` L ) /\ E. x e. ( Base ` L ) ( x ( .r ` L ) y ) = z ) } )
27	16, 21, 26	3eqtr4d 2281	1 |- ( ph -> ( ||r ` K ) = ( ||r ` L ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   {copab 4191   ` cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   Basecbs 13352   .rcmulr 13432  SRingcsrg 14267   ||_rcdsr 14392

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-addass 8281  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltadd 8295

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-ltxr 8365  df-inn 9305  df-2 9363  df-3 9364  df-ndx 13355  df-slot 13356  df-base 13358  df-sets 13359  df-plusg 13444  df-mulr 13445  df-0g 13612  df-mgm 13676  df-sgrp 13717  df-mnd 13730  df-mgp 14218  df-srg 14268  df-dvdsr 14395

This theorem is used by:  unitpropdg  14455