Theorem leisorel 10580

Description: Version of isorel 5709 for strictly increasing functions on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
leisorel	⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem leisorel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp1 981	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵))
2		simp3r 1010	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)
3		simp3l 1009	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
4		isorel 5709	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
5	4	notbid 656	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
6	1, 2, 3, 5	syl12anc 1214	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
7		simp2l 1007	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ*)
8	7, 3	sseldd 3098	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*)
9	7, 2	sseldd 3098	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*)
10		xrlenlt 7829	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ ¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶))
11	8, 9, 10	syl2anc 408	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ ¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶))
12		simp2r 1008	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*)
13		isof1o 5708	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
14		f1of 5367	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
15	1, 13, 14	3syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
16	15, 3	ffvelrnd 5556	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
17	12, 16	sseldd 3098	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ ℝ*)
18	15, 2	ffvelrnd 5556	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ 𝐵)
19	12, 18	sseldd 3098	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ*)
20		xrlenlt 7829	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ ℝ* ∧ (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
21	17, 19, 20	syl2anc 408	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
22	6, 11, 21	3bitr4d 219	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∧ w3a 962   ∈ wcel 1480   ⊆ wss 3071   class class class wbr 3929  ⟶wf 5119  –1-1-onto→wf1o 5122  ‘cfv 5123   Isom wiso 5124  ℝ^*cxr 7799   < clt 7800   ≤ cle 7801

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-v 2688  df-sbc 2910  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-id 4215  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-iota 5088  df-fun 5125  df-fn 5126  df-f 5127  df-f1 5128  df-f1o 5130  df-fv 5131  df-isom 5132  df-le 7806

This theorem is referenced by:  seq3coll  10585  summodclem2a  11150  prodmodclem2a  11345