Theorem leisorel 10750

Description: Version of isorel 5776 for strictly increasing functions on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
leisorel	⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem leisorel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simp1 987	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵))
2		simp3r 1016	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)
3		simp3l 1015	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
4		isorel 5776	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
5	4	notbid 657	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
6	1, 2, 3, 5	syl12anc 1226	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
7		simp2l 1013	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ*)
8	7, 3	sseldd 3143	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*)
9	7, 2	sseldd 3143	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*)
10		xrlenlt 7963	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ ¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶))
11	8, 9, 10	syl2anc 409	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ ¬ 𝐷 < 𝐶))
12		simp2r 1014	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*)
13		isof1o 5775	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
14		f1of 5432	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
15	1, 13, 14	3syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
16	15, 3	ffvelrnd 5621	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
17	12, 16	sseldd 3143	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ ℝ*)
18	15, 2	ffvelrnd 5621	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ 𝐵)
19	12, 18	sseldd 3143	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ*)
20		xrlenlt 7963	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ ℝ* ∧ (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
21	17, 19, 20	syl2anc 409	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝐷) < (𝐹‘𝐶)))
22	6, 11, 21	3bitr4d 219	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom < , < (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ (𝐹‘𝐷)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∧ w3a 968   ∈ wcel 2136   ⊆ wss 3116   class class class wbr 3982  ⟶wf 5184  –1-1-onto→wf1o 5187  ‘cfv 5188   Isom wiso 5189  ℝ^*cxr 7932   < clt 7933   ≤ cle 7934

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-14 2139  ax-ext 2147  ax-sep 4100  ax-pow 4153  ax-pr 4187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-eu 2017  df-mo 2018  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-ral 2449  df-rex 2450  df-v 2728  df-sbc 2952  df-dif 3118  df-un 3120  df-in 3122  df-ss 3129  df-pw 3561  df-sn 3582  df-pr 3583  df-op 3585  df-uni 3790  df-br 3983  df-opab 4044  df-id 4271  df-xp 4610  df-rel 4611  df-cnv 4612  df-co 4613  df-dm 4614  df-rn 4615  df-iota 5153  df-fun 5190  df-fn 5191  df-f 5192  df-f1 5193  df-f1o 5195  df-fv 5196  df-isom 5197  df-le 7939

This theorem is referenced by:  seq3coll  10755  summodclem2a  11322  prodmodclem2a  11517