Theorem brtxp2 36858

Description: The binary relation over a tail cross when the second argument is not an ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brtxp2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brtxp2	⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem brtxp2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		txpss3v 36855	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆) ⊆ (V × (V × V))
2	1	brel 5723	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V × V)))
3	2	simprd 501	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ (V × V))
4		elvv 5733	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
5	3, 4	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
7		19.41vv 1985	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
8	6, 7	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
9		breq2 5112	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
10	9	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
11	10	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
12		brtxp2.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
13		vex 3458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
14		vex 3458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
15	12, 13, 14	brtxp 36857	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
16	15	anbi2i 635	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
17		3anass 1111	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
18	16, 17	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
19	18	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
20	8, 11, 19	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454  ⟨cop 4840   class class class wbr 5108   × cxp 5656   ⊗ ctxp 36807

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-fo 6572  df-fv 6574  df-1st 8035  df-2nd 8036  df-txp 36831

This theorem is used by:  lemsuccf  36918  brrestrict  36928