Theorem brtxp2 36408

Description: The binary relation over a tail cross when the second argument is not an ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brtxp2.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brtxp2	⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem brtxp2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		txpss3v 36405	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆) ⊆ (V × (V × V))
2	1	brel 5728	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V × V)))
3	2	simprd 501	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ (V × V))
4		elvv 5738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
5	3, 4	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
7		19.41vv 1983	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
8	6, 7	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵))
9		breq2 5115	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
10	9	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
11	10	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
12		brtxp2.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
13		vex 3461	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
14		vex 3461	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
15	12, 13, 14	brtxp 36407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
16	15	anbi2i 635	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
17		3anass 1111	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
18	16, 17	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ (𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
19	18	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))
20	8, 11, 19	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ⊗ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3457  ⟨cop 4597   class class class wbr 5111   × cxp 5661   ⊗ ctxp 36357

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fo 6546  df-fv 6548  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-txp 36381

This theorem is used by:  lemsuccf  36468  brrestrict  36478