Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elfvmptrab1w | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Version of elfvmptrab1 6787 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elfvmptrab1w.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) |
elfvmptrab1w.v | ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elfvmptrab1w | ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | elfvdm 6691 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹) | |
2 | elfvmptrab1w.f | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
3 | 2 | dmmptss 6071 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑉 |
4 | 3 | sseli 3889 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) |
5 | elfvmptrab1w.v | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) | |
6 | rabexg 5202 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3syl 18 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) |
8 | nfcv 2920 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋 | |
9 | nfsbc1v 3717 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
10 | nfcv 2920 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑀 | |
11 | 8, 10 | nfcsbw 3832 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 |
12 | 9, 11 | nfrabw 3304 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} |
13 | csbeq1 3809 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 = ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
14 | sbceq1a 3708 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | rabeqbidv 3399 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
16 | 8, 12, 15, 2 | fvmptf 6781 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
17 | 4, 7, 16 | syl2anc 588 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
18 | 17 | eleq2d 2838 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})) |
19 | elrabi 3597 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
20 | 4, 19 | anim12i 616 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
21 | 20 | ex 417 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
22 | 18, 21 | sylbid 243 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
23 | 1, 22 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2112 {crab 3075 Vcvv 3410 [wsbc 3697 ⦋csb 3806 ↦ cmpt 5113 dom cdm 5525 ‘cfv 6336 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2114 ax-9 2122 ax-10 2143 ax-11 2159 ax-12 2176 ax-ext 2730 ax-sep 5170 ax-nul 5177 ax-pr 5299 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 846 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2071 df-mo 2558 df-eu 2589 df-clab 2737 df-cleq 2751 df-clel 2831 df-nfc 2902 df-ne 2953 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3077 df-rab 3080 df-v 3412 df-sbc 3698 df-csb 3807 df-dif 3862 df-un 3864 df-in 3866 df-ss 3876 df-nul 4227 df-if 4422 df-sn 4524 df-pr 4526 df-op 4530 df-uni 4800 df-br 5034 df-opab 5096 df-mpt 5114 df-id 5431 df-xp 5531 df-rel 5532 df-cnv 5533 df-co 5534 df-dm 5535 df-rn 5536 df-res 5537 df-ima 5538 df-iota 6295 df-fun 6338 df-fv 6344 |
This theorem is referenced by: elfvmptrab 6788 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |