| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elfvmptrab1w | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Version of elfvmptrab1 7025 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2407. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) Avoid ax-13 2407. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elfvmptrab1w.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| elfvmptrab1w.v | ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elfvmptrab1w | ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | elfvdm 6922 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹) | |
| 2 | elfvmptrab1w.f | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 3 | 2 | dmmptss 6247 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑉 |
| 4 | 3 | sseli 3936 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) |
| 5 | elfvmptrab1w.v | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) | |
| 6 | rabexg 5313 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3syl 19 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) |
| 8 | nfcv 2928 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋 | |
| 9 | nfsbc1v 3767 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
| 10 | nfcv 2928 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑀 | |
| 11 | 8, 10 | nfcsbw 3882 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 |
| 12 | 9, 11 | nfrabw 3455 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} |
| 13 | csbeq1 3859 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 = ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
| 14 | sbceq1a 3758 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
| 15 | 13, 14 | rabeqbidv 3437 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
| 16 | 8, 12, 15, 2 | fvmptf 7018 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
| 17 | 4, 7, 16 | syl2anc 596 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
| 18 | 17 | eleq2d 2852 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})) |
| 19 | elrabi 3649 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
| 20 | 4, 19 | anim12i 625 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
| 21 | 20 | ex 418 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
| 22 | 18, 21 | sylbid 243 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
| 23 | 1, 22 | mpcom 39 | 1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 {crab 3419 Vcvv 3458 [wsbc 3747 ⦋csb 3856 ↦ cmpt 5197 dom cdm 5666 ‘cfv 6543 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2738 ax-sep 5262 ax-nul 5274 ax-pr 5409 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2570 df-eu 2600 df-clab 2745 df-cleq 2758 df-clel 2841 df-nfc 2915 df-ne 2962 df-ral 3083 df-rex 3093 df-rab 3420 df-v 3460 df-sbc 3748 df-csb 3857 df-dif 3911 df-un 3913 df-in 3915 df-ss 3925 df-nul 4290 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4878 df-br 5115 df-opab 5179 df-mpt 5198 df-id 5561 df-xp 5672 df-rel 5673 df-cnv 5674 df-co 5675 df-dm 5676 df-rn 5677 df-res 5678 df-ima 5679 df-iota 6499 df-fun 6545 df-fv 6551 |
| This theorem is used by: elfvmptrab 7026 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |