Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elfvmptrab1w | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Version of elfvmptrab1 6902 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elfvmptrab1w.f | ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) |
elfvmptrab1w.v | ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elfvmptrab1w | ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | elfvdm 6806 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹) | |
2 | elfvmptrab1w.f | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
3 | 2 | dmmptss 6144 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑉 |
4 | 3 | sseli 3917 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) |
5 | elfvmptrab1w.v | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) | |
6 | rabexg 5255 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3syl 18 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) |
8 | nfcv 2907 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋 | |
9 | nfsbc1v 3736 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
10 | nfcv 2907 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑀 | |
11 | 8, 10 | nfcsbw 3859 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 |
12 | 9, 11 | nfrabw 3318 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} |
13 | csbeq1 3835 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 = ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
14 | sbceq1a 3727 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | rabeqbidv 3420 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
16 | 8, 12, 15, 2 | fvmptf 6896 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
17 | 4, 7, 16 | syl2anc 584 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) |
18 | 17 | eleq2d 2824 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})) |
19 | elrabi 3618 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀) | |
20 | 4, 19 | anim12i 613 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
21 | 20 | ex 413 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
22 | 18, 21 | sylbid 239 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))) |
23 | 1, 22 | mpcom 38 | 1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 {crab 3068 Vcvv 3432 [wsbc 3716 ⦋csb 3832 ↦ cmpt 5157 dom cdm 5589 ‘cfv 6433 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pr 5352 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-id 5489 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fv 6441 |
This theorem is referenced by: elfvmptrab 6903 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |