Theorem elfvmptrab1 6884

Description: Implications for the value of a function defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the argument of the function. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker elfvmptrab1w 6883 when possible. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elfvmptrab1.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})
elfvmptrab1.v	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elfvmptrab1	⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑀,𝑦   𝑥,𝑉   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑦,𝑌   𝑦,𝑚

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑚)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦,𝑚)   𝑀(𝑚)   𝑉(𝑦,𝑚)   𝑋(𝑚)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑚)

Proof of Theorem elfvmptrab1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ne0i 4265	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ ∅)
2		ndmfv 6786	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = ∅)
3	2	necon1ai 2970	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ ∅ → 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹)
4		elfvmptrab1.f	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})
5	4	dmmptss 6133	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑉
6	5	sseli 3913	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)
7		elfvmptrab1.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)
8		rabexg 5250	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V)
9	6, 7, 8	3syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V)
10		nfcv 2906	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋
11		nfsbc1v 3731	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑
12		nfcv 2906	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑀
13	10, 12	nfcsb 3856	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀
14	11, 13	nfrab 3312	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}
15		csbeq1 3831	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 = ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)
16		sbceq1a 3722	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	15, 16	rabeqbidv 3410	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})
18	10, 14, 17, 4	fvmptf 6878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ V) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})
19	6, 9, 18	syl2anc 583	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑})
20	19	eleq2d 2824	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}))
21		elrabi 3611	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)
22	6, 21	anim12i 612	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑}) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
23	22	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ [𝑋 / 𝑥]𝜑} → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)))
24	20, 23	sylbid 239	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)))
25	1, 3, 24	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)))
26	25	pm2.43i 52	1 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942  {crab 3067  Vcvv 3422  [wsbc 3711  ⦋csb 3828  ∅c0 4253   ↦ cmpt 5153  dom cdm 5580  ‘cfv 6418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-13 2372  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426

This theorem is referenced by: (None)