P. 71 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7001-7100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	f1imaeq 7001	Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves equality. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) = (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	f1imapss 7002	Taking images under a one-to-one function preserves proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 “ 𝐶) ⊊ (𝐹 “ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐷))
Theorem	fpropnf1 7003	A function, given by an unordered pair of ordered pairs, which is not injective/one-to-one. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑋, 𝑍⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ ¬ Fun ◡𝐹))
Theorem	f1dom3fv3dif 7004	The function values for a 1-1 function from a set with three different elements are different. (Contributed by AV, 20-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) ≠ (𝐹‘𝐶)))
Theorem	f1dom3el3dif 7005*	The range of a 1-1 function from a set with three different elements has (at least) three different elements. (Contributed by AV, 20-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:{𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}–1-1→𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑅 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑧))
Theorem	dff14a 7006*	A one-to-one function in terms of different function values for different arguments. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dff14b 7007*	A one-to-one function in terms of different function values for different arguments. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥})(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
Theorem	f12dfv 7008	A one-to-one function with a domain with at least two different elements in terms of function values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑋, 𝑌}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑌))))
Theorem	f13dfv 7009	A one-to-one function with a domain with at least three different elements in terms of function values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑌) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑌) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑍)))))
Theorem	dff1o6 7010*	A one-to-one onto function in terms of function values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2008.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	f1ocnvfv1 7011	The converse value of the value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (◡𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	f1ocnvfv2 7012	The value of the converse value of a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝐶)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	f1ocnvfv 7013	Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 → (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
Theorem	f1ocnvfvb 7014	Relationship between the value of a one-to-one onto function and the value of its converse. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷 ↔ (◡𝐹‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
Theorem	nvof1o 7015	An involution is a bijection. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	nvocnv 7016*	The converse of an involution is the function itself. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-May-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) → ◡𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	fsnex 7017*	Relate a function with a singleton as domain and one variable. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑓(𝑓:{𝐴}⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 𝜓))
Theorem	f1prex 7018*	Relate a one-to-one function with a pair as domain and two different variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝐵) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (∃𝑓(𝑓:{𝐴, 𝐵}–1-1→𝐷 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	f1ocnvdm 7019	The value of the converse of a one-to-one onto function belongs to its domain. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (◡𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	f1ocnvfvrneq 7020	If the values of a one-to-one function for two arguments from the range of the function are equal, the arguments themselves must be equal. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐹)) → ((◡𝐹‘𝐶) = (◡𝐹‘𝐷) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	fcof1 7021	An application is injective if a retraction exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 11-Nov-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ (𝑅 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	fcofo 7022	An application is surjective if a section exists. Proposition 8 of [BourbakiEns] p. E.II.18. (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 27-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑆:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑆) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)) → 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	cbvfo 7023*	Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	cbvexfo 7024*	Change bound variable between domain and range of function. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	cocan1 7025	An injection is left-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵–1-1→𝐶 ∧ 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐾:𝐴⟶𝐵) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐾) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))
Theorem	cocan2 7026	A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))
Theorem	fcof1oinvd 7027	Show that a function is the inverse of a bijective function if their composition is the identity function. Formerly part of proof of fcof1o 7030. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	fcof1od 7028	A function is bijective if a "retraction" and a "section" exist, see comments for fcof1 7021 and fcofo 7022. Formerly part of proof of fcof1o 7030. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	2fcoidinvd 7029	Show that a function is the inverse of a function if their compositions are the identity functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	fcof1o 7030	Show that two functions are inverse to each other by computing their compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴) ∧ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐺))
Theorem	2fvcoidd 7031*	Show that the composition of two functions is the identity function by applying both functions to each value of the domain of the first function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	2fvidf1od 7032*	A function is bijective if it has an inverse function. (Contributed by AV, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑏)) = 𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	2fvidinvd 7033*	Show that two functions are inverse to each other by applying them twice to each value of their domains. (Contributed by AV, 13-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑏)) = 𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	foeqcnvco 7034	Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the converse. EDITORIAL: Is there a relation-algebraic proof of this? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐵)))
Theorem	f1eqcocnv 7035	Condition for function equality in terms of vanishing of the composition with the inverse. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	f1eqcocnvOLD 7036	Obsolete version of f1eqcocnv 7035 as of 29-May-2024. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	fveqf1o 7037	Given a bijection 𝐹, produce another bijection 𝐺 which additionally maps two specified points. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ∘ (( I ↾ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐶, (◡𝐹‘𝐷)})) ∪ {⟨𝐶, (◡𝐹‘𝐷)⟩, ⟨(◡𝐹‘𝐷), 𝐶⟩}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝐶) = 𝐷))
Theorem	nf1const 7038	A constant function from at least two elements is not one-to-one. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶{𝐵} ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐶)
Theorem	nf1oconst 7039	A constant function from at least two elements is not bijective. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶{𝐵} ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶)
Theorem	fliftrel 7040*	𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆))
Theorem	fliftel 7041*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	fliftel1 7042*	Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴𝐹𝐵)
Theorem	fliftcnv 7043*	Converse of the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	fliftfun 7044*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	fliftfund 7045*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
Theorem	fliftfuns 7046*	The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘𝐴 = 𝐵, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐴 → ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝑧 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)))
Theorem	fliftf 7047*	The domain and range of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹:ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴)⟶𝑆))
Theorem	fliftval 7048*	The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑌 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝐶) = 𝐷)
Theorem	isoeq1 7049	Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝐻 = 𝐺 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	isoeq2 7050	Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑇, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	isoeq3 7051	Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐵)))
Theorem	isoeq4 7052	Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐵)))
Theorem	isoeq5 7053	Equality theorem for isomorphisms. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐶)))
Theorem	nfiso 7054	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an isomorphism. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Theorem	isof1o 7055	An isomorphism is a one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	isof1oidb 7056	A function is a bijection iff it is an isomorphism regarding the identity relation. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ 𝐻 Isom I , I (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isof1oopb 7057	A function is a bijection iff it is an isomorphism regarding the universal class of ordered pairs as relations. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ 𝐻 Isom (V × V), (V × V)(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isorel 7058	An isomorphism connects binary relations via its function values. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 ↔ (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷)))
Theorem	soisores 7059*	Express the condition of isomorphism on two strict orders for a function's restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Or 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, (𝐹 “ 𝐴)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦))))
Theorem	soisoi 7060*	Infer isomorphism from one direction of an order proof for isomorphisms between strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) ∧ (𝐻:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦)))) → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isoid 7061	Identity law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)
Theorem	isocnv 7062	Converse law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐻 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴))
Theorem	isocnv2 7063	Converse law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom ◡𝑅, ◡𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isocnv3 7064	Complementation law for isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) ∖ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∖ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝐶, 𝐷 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores2 7065	An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, (𝑆 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵))(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores1 7066	An isomorphism from one well-order to another can be restricted on either well-order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 Isom (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)), 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	isores3 7067	Induced isomorphism on a subset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐻 “ 𝐾)) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐾) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐾, 𝑋))
Theorem	isotr 7068	Composition (transitive) law for isomorphism. Proposition 6.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑆, 𝑇 (𝐵, 𝐶)) → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐻) Isom 𝑅, 𝑇 (𝐴, 𝐶))
Theorem	isomin 7069	Isomorphisms preserve minimal elements. Note that (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}) is Takeuti and Zaring's idiom for the initial segment {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝐷}. Proposition 6.31(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐶 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷})) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐻 “ 𝐶) ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})) = ∅))
Theorem	isoini 7070	Isomorphisms preserve initial segments. Proposition 6.31(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 “ (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝐷}))) = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})))
Theorem	isoini2 7071	Isomorphisms are isomorphisms on their initial segments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∩ (◡𝑅 “ {𝑋}))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 ∩ (◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝑋)}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐻 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷))
Theorem	isofrlem 7072*	Lemma for isofr 7074. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
Theorem	isoselem 7073*	Lemma for isose 7075. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
Theorem	isofr 7074	An isomorphism preserves well-foundedness. Proposition 6.32(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵))
Theorem	isose 7075	An isomorphism preserves set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Se 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Se 𝐵))
Theorem	isofr2 7076	A weak form of isofr 7074 that does not need Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
Theorem	isopolem 7077	Lemma for isopo 7078. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Po 𝐵 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	isopo 7078	An isomorphism preserves partial ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Po 𝐵))
Theorem	isosolem 7079	Lemma for isoso 7080. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Or 𝐵 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴))
Theorem	isoso 7080	An isomorphism preserves strict ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
Theorem	isowe 7081	An isomorphism preserves well-ordering. Proposition 6.32(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
Theorem	isowe2 7082*	A weak form of isowe 7081 that does not need Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V) → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	f1oiso 7083*	Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. Proposition 6.33 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 = (𝐻‘𝑥) ∧ 𝑤 = (𝐻‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}) → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	f1oiso2 7084*	Any one-to-one onto function determines an isomorphism with an induced relation 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (◡𝐻‘𝑥)𝑅(◡𝐻‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	f1owe 7085*	Well-ordering of isomorphic relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	weniso 7086	A set-like well-ordering has no nontrivial automorphisms. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → 𝐹 = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	weisoeq 7087	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two set-like well-ordered classes. Class version of wemoiso 7656. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	weisoeq2 7088	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two set-like well-ordered classes. Class version of wemoiso2 7657. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑆 We 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 Se 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	knatar 7089*	The Knaster-Tarski theorem says that every monotone function over a complete lattice has a (least) fixpoint. Here we specialize this theorem to the case when the lattice is the powerset lattice 𝒫 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∩ {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
2.3.16  Cantor's Theorem
Theorem	canth 7090	No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e. no function can map 𝐴 it onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 8654. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 7091 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1802 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	ncanth 7091	Cantor's theorem fails for the universal class (which is not a set but a proper class by vprc 5183). Specifically, the identity function maps the universe onto its power class. Compare canth 7090 that works for sets. This failure comes from a limitation of the collection principle (which is necessary to avoid Russell's paradox ru 3719): 𝒫 V, being a class, cannot contain proper classes, so it is no larger than V, which is why the identity function "succeeds" in being surjective onto 𝒫 V (see pwv 4797). See also the remark in ru 3719 about NF, in which Cantor's theorem fails for sets that are "too large". This theorem gives some intuition behind that failure: in NF the universal class is a set, and it equals its own power set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Dec-2023.)
⊢ I :V–onto→𝒫 V
2.3.17  Restricted iota (description binder)
Syntax	crio 7092	Extend class notation with restricted description binder.
class (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Definition	df-riota 7093	Define restricted description binder. In case there is no unique 𝑥 such that (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) holds, it evaluates to the empty set. See also comments for df-iota 6283. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by NM, 2-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	riotaeqdv 7094*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	riotabidv 7095*	Formula-building deduction for restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	riotaeqbidv 7096*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	riotaex 7097	Restricted iota is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) ∈ V
Theorem	riotav 7098	An iota restricted to the universe is unrestricted. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ V 𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	riotauni 7099	Restricted iota in terms of class union. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	nfriota1 7100*	The abstraction variable in a restricted iota descriptor isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)