Theorem frpoinsg 6344

Description: Well-Founded Induction Schema (variant). If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded set-like partial order class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2022.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frpoinsg.1	⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frpoinsg	⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝑦,𝑅,𝑧

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem frpoinsg

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfss3 3925	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
2		nfcv 2924	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3	2	elrabsf 3788	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑))
4	3	simprbi 502	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
5	4	ralimi 3101	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)𝑧 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → ∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
6	1, 5	sylbi 220	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → ∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑)
7		nfv 1943	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
8		nfcv 2924	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)
9		nfsbc1v 3763	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑
10	8, 9	nfralw 3311	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑
11		nfsbc1v 3763	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑
12	10, 11	nfim 1925	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
13	7, 12	nfim 1925	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
14		eleq1w 2845	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴))
15	14	anbi2d 641	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)))
16		predeq3 6306	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) = Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))
17	16	raleqdv 3322	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑))
18		sbceq1a 3754	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
19	17, 18	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ((∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)))
20	15, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ((((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))))
21		frpoinsg.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))
22	13, 20, 21	chvarfv 2275	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
23	6, 22	syl5 35	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
24		simpr 489	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
25	23, 24	jctild 534	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)))
26	2	elrabsf 3788	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑))
27	25, 26	imbitrrdi 255	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑤 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}))
28	27	ralrimiva 3156	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑤 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}))
29		ssrab2 4033	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
30	28, 29	jctil 528	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ({𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑤 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})))
31		frpoind 6343	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ ({𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑤 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}))) → 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
32	30, 31	mpdan 699	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
33		rabid2 3448	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
34	32, 33	sylib 221	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078  {crab 3415  [wsbc 3743   ⊆ wss 3904   Po wpo 5566   Fr wfr 5610   Se wse 5611  Predcpred 6301

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-po 5568  df-fr 5613  df-se 5614  df-xp 5666  df-cnv 5668  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-pred 6302

This theorem is used by:  frpoins2fg  6345  wfisg  6352