Theorem isf32lem1 10313

Description: Lemma for isfin3-2 10327. Derive weak ordering property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isf32lem.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)
isf32lem.b	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
isf32lem.c	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isf32lem1	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐺(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem isf32lem1

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6861	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐵))
2	1	sseq1d 3981	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
3	2	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
4		fveq2 6861	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
5	4	sseq1d 3981	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
6	5	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
7		fveq2 6861	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
8	7	sseq1d 3981	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
9	8	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
10		fveq2 6861	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
11	10	sseq1d 3981	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
12	11	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
13		ssid 3972	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)
14	13	2a1i 12	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
15		isf32lem.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
16		suceq 6403	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑏)
17	16	fveq2d 6865	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
18		fveq2 6861	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
19	17, 18	sseq12d 3983	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
20	19	rspcv 3587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
21	15, 20	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
22	21	ad2antrr 726	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
23		sstr2 3956	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏) → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
24	22, 23	syl6 35	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
25	24	a2d 29	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
26	3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 25	findsg 7876	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
27	26	impr 454	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3045   ⊆ wss 3917  𝒫 cpw 4566  ∩ cint 4913  ran crn 5642  suc csuc 6337  ⟶wf 6510  ‘cfv 6514  ωcom 7845

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-pss 3937  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-tr 5218  df-eprel 5541  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-fr 5594  df-we 5596  df-ord 6338  df-on 6339  df-lim 6340  df-suc 6341  df-iota 6467  df-fv 6522  df-om 7846

This theorem is referenced by:  isf32lem2  10314  isf32lem3  10315