Theorem isf32lem1 10390

Description: Lemma for isfin3-2 10404. Derive weak ordering property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Nov-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isf32lem.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶𝒫 𝐺)
isf32lem.b	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
isf32lem.c	⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∩ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isf32lem1	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐺(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem isf32lem1

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐵))
2	1	sseq1d 4026	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
3	2	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
4		fveq2 6906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
5	4	sseq1d 4026	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
6	5	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
7		fveq2 6906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
8	7	sseq1d 4026	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
9	8	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = suc 𝑏 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
10		fveq2 6906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
11	10	sseq1d 4026	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
12	11	imbi2d 340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑎) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
13		ssid 4017	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)
14	13	2a1i 12	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
15		isf32lem.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))
16		suceq 6451	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑏)
17	16	fveq2d 6910	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑏))
18		fveq2 6906	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑏))
19	17, 18	sseq12d 4028	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑏 → ((𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
20	19	rspcv 3617	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
21	15, 20	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
22	21	ad2antrr 726	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏)))
23		sstr2 4001	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑏) → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
24	22, 23	syl6 35	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
25	24	a2d 29	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑏 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑏) → ((𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑏) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))))
26	3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 25	findsg 7919	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)))
27	26	impr 454	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3058   ⊆ wss 3962  𝒫 cpw 4604  ∩ cint 4950  ran crn 5689  suc csuc 6387  ⟶wf 6558  ‘cfv 6562  ωcom 7886

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pr 5437  ax-un 7753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-sb 2062  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-pss 3982  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-tr 5265  df-eprel 5588  df-po 5596  df-so 5597  df-fr 5640  df-we 5642  df-ord 6388  df-on 6389  df-lim 6390  df-suc 6391  df-iota 6515  df-fv 6570  df-om 7887

This theorem is referenced by:  isf32lem2  10391  isf32lem3  10392