| Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > ismxidl | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| mxidlval.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ismxidl | ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mxidlval.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) | |
| 2 | 1 | mxidlval 33968 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))}) |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2d 2847 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))})) |
| 4 | neeq1 3018 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | sseq1 3956 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗)) | |
| 6 | eqeq2 2773 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀)) | |
| 7 | 6 | orbi1d 930 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | imbi12d 347 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 9 | 8 | ralbidv 3186 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 10 | 4, 9 | anbi12d 644 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 11 | 10 | elrab 3645 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 12 | 3anass 1111 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) | |
| 13 | 11, 12 | bitr4i 281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | bitrdi 290 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∨ wo 861 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2956 ∀wral 3077 {crab 3413 ⊆ wss 3899 ‘cfv 6531 Basecbs 17367 Ringcrg 20439 LIdealclidl 21464 MaxIdealcmxidl 33966 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5249 ax-nul 5260 ax-pr 5391 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3078 df-rex 3088 df-rab 3414 df-v 3453 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-id 5546 df-xp 5657 df-rel 5658 df-cnv 5659 df-co 5660 df-dm 5661 df-iota 6487 df-fun 6533 df-fv 6539 df-mxidl 33967 |
| This theorem is used by: mxidlidl 33970 mxidlnr 33971 mxidlmax 33972 crngmxidl 33976 mxidlirred 33979 ssmxidl 33981 drng0mxidl 33982 opprmxidlabs 33993 qsdrng 34003 dflringlem3 34010 dflring4 34012 zarclssn 34487 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |