Theorem ismxidl 33776

Description: The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mxidlval.1	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ismxidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑗   𝑗,𝑀

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem ismxidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mxidlval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
2	1	mxidlval 33775	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))})
3	2	eleq2d 2852	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))}))
4		neeq1 3023	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵))
5		sseq1 3965	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗))
6		eqeq2 2778	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀))
7	6	orbi1d 930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
9	8	ralbidv 3191	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
10	4, 9	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
11	10	elrab 3653	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
12		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
13	11, 12	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
14	3, 13	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2961  ∀wral 3082  {crab 3419   ⊆ wss 3908  ‘cfv 6543  Basecbs 17294  Ringcrg 20346  LIdealclidl 21367  MaxIdealcmxidl 33773

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-mxidl 33774

This theorem is used by:  mxidlidl  33777  mxidlnr  33778  mxidlmax  33779  crngmxidl  33783  mxidlirred  33786  ssmxidl  33788  drng0mxidl  33789  opprmxidlabs  33800  qsdrng  33810  dflringlem3  33817  dflring4  33819  zarclssn  34294