| Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > ismxidl | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| mxidlval.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ismxidl | ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mxidlval.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) | |
| 2 | 1 | mxidlval 34070 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))}) |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2d 2850 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))})) |
| 4 | neeq1 3021 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | sseq1 3938 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗)) | |
| 6 | eqeq2 2775 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀)) | |
| 7 | 6 | orbi1d 930 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | imbi12d 347 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 9 | 8 | ralbidv 3189 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 10 | 4, 9 | anbi12d 644 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 11 | 10 | elrab 3648 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 12 | 3anass 1111 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) | |
| 13 | 11, 12 | bitr4i 281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | bitrdi 290 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∨ wo 861 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2147 ≠ wne 2959 ∀wral 3080 {crab 3416 ⊆ wss 3900 ‘cfv 6561 Basecbs 17419 Ringcrg 20492 LIdealclidl 21517 MaxIdealcmxidl 34068 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5253 ax-nul 5264 ax-pr 5396 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-id 5551 df-xp 5662 df-rel 5663 df-cnv 5664 df-co 5665 df-dm 5666 df-iota 6515 df-fun 6563 df-fv 6569 df-mxidl 34069 |
| This theorem is used by: mxidlidl 34072 mxidlnr 34073 mxidlmax 34074 crngmxidl 34078 mxidlirred 34081 ssmxidl 34083 drng0mxidl 34084 opprmxidlabs 34095 qsdrng 34105 dflringlem3 34112 dflring4 34114 zarclssn 34588 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |