Theorem ismxidl 31042

Description: The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mxidlval.1	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ismxidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑗   𝑗,𝑀

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐵(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem ismxidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mxidlval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
2	1	mxidlval 31041	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))})
3	2	eleq2d 2875	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))}))
4		neeq1 3049	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵))
5		sseq1 3940	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗))
6		eqeq2 2810	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀))
7	6	orbi1d 914	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 348	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
9	8	ralbidv 3162	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
10	4, 9	anbi12d 633	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
11	10	elrab 3628	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
12		3anass 1092	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))
13	11, 12	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))
14	3, 13	syl6bb 290	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  ∀wral 3106  {crab 3110   ⊆ wss 3881  ‘cfv 6324  Basecbs 16475  Ringcrg 19290  LIdealclidl 19935  MaxIdealcmxidl 31039

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-id 5425  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fv 6332  df-mxidl 31040

This theorem is referenced by:  mxidlidl  31043  mxidlnr  31044  mxidlmax  31045  ssmxidl  31050  zarclssn  31226