| Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > ismxidl | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Jan-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| mxidlval.1 | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ismxidl | ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mxidlval.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) | |
| 2 | 1 | mxidlval 33689 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))}) |
| 3 | 2 | eleq2d 2855 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))})) |
| 4 | neeq1 3026 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵)) | |
| 5 | sseq1 3970 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗)) | |
| 6 | eqeq2 2781 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀)) | |
| 7 | 6 | orbi1d 929 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | imbi12d 347 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 9 | 8 | ralbidv 3194 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 10 | 4, 9 | anbi12d 643 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 11 | 10 | elrab 3659 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| 12 | 3anass 1109 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) | |
| 13 | 11, 12 | bitr4i 281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵)))) |
| 14 | 3, 13 | bitrdi 290 | 1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdeal‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝐵))))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ∨ wo 860 ∧ w3a 1101 = wceq 1567 ∈ wcel 2149 ≠ wne 2964 ∀wral 3085 {crab 3423 ⊆ wss 3913 ‘cfv 6537 Basecbs 17269 Ringcrg 20315 LIdealclidl 21308 MaxIdealcmxidl 33687 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-10 2182 ax-11 2198 ax-12 2219 ax-ext 2741 ax-sep 5261 ax-nul 5271 ax-pr 5405 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1570 df-fal 1580 df-ex 1807 df-nf 1811 df-sb 2098 df-mo 2573 df-eu 2603 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-nfc 2918 df-ne 2965 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3096 df-rab 3424 df-v 3465 df-dif 3916 df-un 3918 df-in 3920 df-ss 3930 df-nul 4295 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4877 df-br 5114 df-opab 5178 df-mpt 5197 df-id 5557 df-xp 5668 df-rel 5669 df-cnv 5670 df-co 5671 df-dm 5672 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fv 6545 df-mxidl 33688 |
| This theorem is referenced by: mxidlidl 33691 mxidlnr 33692 mxidlmax 33693 crngmxidl 33697 mxidlirred 33700 ssmxidl 33702 drng0mxidl 33703 opprmxidlabs 33714 qsdrng 33724 dflringlem3 33731 dflring4 33733 zarclssn 34208 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |