Theorem istrnN 40204

Description: The predicate "is a translation". (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
trnset.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
trnset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
trnset.p	⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.o	⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
trnset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
trnset.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
trnset.t	⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
istrnN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑟,𝑞,𝐾   𝑊,𝑞,𝑟   𝐷,𝑞,𝑟   𝐹,𝑞,𝑟

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐵(𝑟,𝑞)   + (𝑟,𝑞)   𝑆(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑇(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐿(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑀(𝑟,𝑞)   ⊥ (𝑟,𝑞)

Proof of Theorem istrnN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trnset.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
2		trnset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
3		trnset.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
4		trnset.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
5		trnset.w	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
6		trnset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
7		trnset.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
8		trnset.t	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	trnsetN 40203	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑇‘𝐷) = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))})
10	9	eleq2d 2817	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))}))
11		fveq1 6821	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑞) = (𝐹‘𝑞))
12	11	oveq2d 7362	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) = (𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)))
13	12	ineq1d 4166	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
14		fveq1 6821	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑟) = (𝐹‘𝑟))
15	14	oveq2d 7362	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) = (𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)))
16	15	ineq1d 4166	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
17	13, 16	eqeq12d 2747	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
18	17	2ralbidv 3196	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
19	18	elrab 3642	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
20	10, 19	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  ∀wral 3047  {crab 3395   ∩ cin 3896  {csn 4573  ‘cfv 6481  (class class class)co 7346  Atomscatm 39310  PSubSpcpsubsp 39543  +_𝑃cpadd 39842  ⊥_𝑃cpolN 39949  WAtomscwpointsN 40033  PAutcpautN 40034  DilcdilN 40149  TrnctrnN 40150

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5215  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3347  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3737  df-csb 3846  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-in 3904  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-pw 4549  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-uni 4857  df-iun 4941  df-br 5090  df-opab 5152  df-mpt 5171  df-id 5509  df-xp 5620  df-rel 5621  df-cnv 5622  df-co 5623  df-dm 5624  df-rn 5625  df-res 5626  df-ima 5627  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fn 6484  df-f 6485  df-f1 6486  df-fo 6487  df-f1o 6488  df-fv 6489  df-ov 7349  df-trnN 40154

This theorem is referenced by: (None)