Theorem istrnN 39539

Description: The predicate "is a translation". (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
trnset.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
trnset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
trnset.p	⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.o	⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
trnset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
trnset.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
trnset.t	⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
istrnN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑟,𝑞,𝐾   𝑊,𝑞,𝑟   𝐷,𝑞,𝑟   𝐹,𝑞,𝑟

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐵(𝑟,𝑞)   + (𝑟,𝑞)   𝑆(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑇(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐿(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑀(𝑟,𝑞)   ⊥ (𝑟,𝑞)

Proof of Theorem istrnN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trnset.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
2		trnset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
3		trnset.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
4		trnset.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
5		trnset.w	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
6		trnset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
7		trnset.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
8		trnset.t	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	trnsetN 39538	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑇‘𝐷) = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))})
10	9	eleq2d 2813	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))}))
11		fveq1 6883	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑞) = (𝐹‘𝑞))
12	11	oveq2d 7420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) = (𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)))
13	12	ineq1d 4206	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
14		fveq1 6883	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑟) = (𝐹‘𝑟))
15	14	oveq2d 7420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) = (𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)))
16	15	ineq1d 4206	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
17	13, 16	eqeq12d 2742	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
18	17	2ralbidv 3212	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
19	18	elrab 3678	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
20	10, 19	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3055  {crab 3426   ∩ cin 3942  {csn 4623  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7404  Atomscatm 38644  PSubSpcpsubsp 38878  +_𝑃cpadd 39177  ⊥_𝑃cpolN 39284  WAtomscwpointsN 39368  PAutcpautN 39369  DilcdilN 39484  TrnctrnN 39485

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-reu 3371  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3889  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-iun 4992  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5225  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-iota 6488  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7407  df-trnN 39489

This theorem is referenced by: (None)