Theorem istrnN 40136

Description: The predicate "is a translation". (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
trnset.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
trnset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
trnset.p	⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.o	⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
trnset.w	⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
trnset.m	⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
trnset.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
trnset.t	⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
istrnN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑟,𝑞,𝐾   𝑊,𝑞,𝑟   𝐷,𝑞,𝑟   𝐹,𝑞,𝑟

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐵(𝑟,𝑞)   + (𝑟,𝑞)   𝑆(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑇(𝑟,𝑞)   𝐿(𝑟,𝑞)   𝑀(𝑟,𝑞)   ⊥ (𝑟,𝑞)

Proof of Theorem istrnN

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trnset.a	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
2		trnset.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)
3		trnset.p	. . . 4 ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)
4		trnset.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⊥ = (⊥𝑃‘𝐾)
5		trnset.w	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑊 = (WAtoms‘𝐾)
6		trnset.m	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑀 = (PAut‘𝐾)
7		trnset.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Dil‘𝐾)
8		trnset.t	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑇 = (Trn‘𝐾)
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8	trnsetN 40135	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑇‘𝐷) = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))})
10	9	eleq2d 2814	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))}))
11		fveq1 6821	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑞) = (𝐹‘𝑞))
12	11	oveq2d 7365	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) = (𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)))
13	12	ineq1d 4170	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
14		fveq1 6821	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑟) = (𝐹‘𝑟))
15	14	oveq2d 7365	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) = (𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)))
16	15	ineq1d 4170	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))
17	13, 16	eqeq12d 2745	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
18	17	2ralbidv 3193	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
19	18	elrab 3648	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑓 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∣ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝑓‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝑓‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷}))))
20	10, 19	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑇‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐿‘𝐷) ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝑊‘𝐷)((𝑞 + (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})) = ((𝑟 + (𝐹‘𝑟)) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘{𝐷})))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044  {crab 3394   ∩ cin 3902  {csn 4577  ‘cfv 6482  (class class class)co 7349  Atomscatm 39242  PSubSpcpsubsp 39475  +_𝑃cpadd 39774  ⊥_𝑃cpolN 39881  WAtomscwpointsN 39965  PAutcpautN 39966  DilcdilN 40081  TrnctrnN 40082

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5218  ax-sep 5235  ax-nul 5245  ax-pr 5371

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3395  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4285  df-if 4477  df-pw 4553  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-op 4584  df-uni 4859  df-iun 4943  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-mpt 5174  df-id 5514  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-rn 5630  df-res 5631  df-ima 5632  df-iota 6438  df-fun 6484  df-fn 6485  df-f 6486  df-f1 6487  df-fo 6488  df-f1o 6489  df-fv 6490  df-ov 7352  df-trnN 40086

This theorem is referenced by: (None)