Theorem marypha2lem4 9507

Description: Lemma for marypha2 9508. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem4	⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑇(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem marypha2lem4

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		marypha2lem.t	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))
2	1	marypha2lem2 9505	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
3	2	imaeq1i 6086	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋)
4		df-ima 5713	. . . 4 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
5	3, 4	eqtri 2768	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
6		resopab2 6065	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
8	7	rneqd 5963	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
9		rnopab 5979	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		df-rex 3077	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	10	bicomi 224	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	abbii 2812	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
13		df-iun 5017	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
14	12, 13	eqtr4i 2771	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥)
15	14	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
16	9, 15	eqtrid 2792	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
17	8, 16	eqtrd 2780	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
18	5, 17	eqtrid 2792	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
19		fnfun 6679	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
20	19	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → Fun 𝐹)
21		funiunfv 7285	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
22	20, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
23	18, 22	eqtrd 2780	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  {cab 2717  ∃wrex 3076   ⊆ wss 3976  {csn 4648  ∪ cuni 4931  ∪ ciun 5015  {copab 5228   × cxp 5698  ran crn 5701   ↾ cres 5702   “ cima 5703  Fun wfun 6567   Fn wfn 6568  ‘cfv 6573

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-fv 6581

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2  9508