Theorem marypha2lem4 9389

Description: Lemma for marypha2 9390. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem4	⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑇(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem marypha2lem4

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		marypha2lem.t	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))
2	1	marypha2lem2 9387	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
3	2	imaeq1i 6028	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋)
4		df-ima 5651	. . . 4 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
5	3, 4	eqtri 2752	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
6		resopab2 6007	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
8	7	rneqd 5902	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
9		rnopab 5918	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		df-rex 3054	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	10	bicomi 224	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	abbii 2796	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
13		df-iun 4957	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
14	12, 13	eqtr4i 2755	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥)
15	14	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
16	9, 15	eqtrid 2776	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
17	8, 16	eqtrd 2764	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
18	5, 17	eqtrid 2776	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
19		fnfun 6618	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
20	19	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → Fun 𝐹)
21		funiunfv 7222	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
22	20, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
23	18, 22	eqtrd 2764	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707  ∃wrex 3053   ⊆ wss 3914  {csn 4589  ∪ cuni 4871  ∪ ciun 4955  {copab 5169   × cxp 5636  ran crn 5639   ↾ cres 5640   “ cima 5641  Fun wfun 6505   Fn wfn 6506  ‘cfv 6511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2  9390