Theorem marypha2lem4 9394

Description: Lemma for marypha2 9395. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem4	⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑇(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem marypha2lem4

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		marypha2lem.t	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))
2	1	marypha2lem2 9392	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
3	2	imaeq1i 6059	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋)
4		df-ima 5674	. . . 4 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
5	3, 4	eqtri 2786	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
6		resopab2 6038	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
7	6	adantl 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
8	7	rneqd 5928	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
9		rnopab 5944	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		df-rex 3090	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	10	bicomi 227	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	abbii 2830	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
13		df-iun 4958	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
14	12, 13	eqtr4i 2789	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥)
15	14	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
16	9, 15	eqtrid 2810	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
17	8, 16	eqtrd 2798	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
18	5, 17	eqtrid 2810	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
19		fnfun 6635	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
20	19	adantr 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → Fun 𝐹)
21		funiunfv 7246	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
22	20, 21	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
23	18, 22	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143  {cab 2741  ∃wrex 3089   ⊆ wss 3905  {csn 4589  ∪ cuni 4872  ∪ ciun 4956  {copab 5173   × cxp 5659  ran crn 5662   ↾ cres 5663   “ cima 5664  Fun wfun 6530   Fn wfn 6531  ‘cfv 6536

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-fv 6544

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2  9395