Theorem marypha2lem4 9476

Description: Lemma for marypha2 9477. Properties of the used relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
marypha2lem4	⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐹   𝑥,𝑋

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑇(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem marypha2lem4

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		marypha2lem.t	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × (𝐹‘𝑥))
2	1	marypha2lem2 9474	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
3	2	imaeq1i 6077	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋)
4		df-ima 5702	. . . 4 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
5	3, 4	eqtri 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋)
6		resopab2 6056	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
8	7	rneqd 5952	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))})
9		rnopab 5968	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))}
10		df-rex 3069	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
11	10	bicomi 224	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
12	11	abbii 2807	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
13		df-iun 4998	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
14	12, 13	eqtr4i 2766	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥)
15	14	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
16	9, 15	eqtrid 2787	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
17	8, 16	eqtrd 2775	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ran ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))} ↾ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
18	5, 17	eqtrid 2787	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥))
19		fnfun 6669	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
20	19	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → Fun 𝐹)
21		funiunfv 7268	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
22	20, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝐹‘𝑥) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))
23	18, 22	eqtrd 2775	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑇 “ 𝑋) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑋))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2106  {cab 2712  ∃wrex 3068   ⊆ wss 3963  {csn 4631  ∪ cuni 4912  ∪ ciun 4996  {copab 5210   × cxp 5687  ran crn 5690   ↾ cres 5691   “ cima 5692  Fun wfun 6557   Fn wfn 6558  ‘cfv 6563

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-fv 6571

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2  9477