Theorem of0r 32768

Description: Function operation with the empty function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
of0r	⊢ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅

Proof of Theorem of0r

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-of 7632	. . . 4 ⊢ ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
3		dmeq 5860	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
4		dmeq 5860	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = ∅ → dom 𝑔 = dom ∅)
5	3, 4	ineqan12d 4176	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅) → (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅))
6	5	mpteq1d 5190	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
8		dm0 5877	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
9	8	ineq2i 4171	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ ∅)
10		in0 4349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ ∅) = ∅
11	9, 10	eqtri 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = ∅
12	11	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = ∅)
13	12	mpteq1d 5190	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
14		mpt0 6642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅
15	14	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅)
16	7, 13, 15	3eqtrd 2776	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅)
17		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → 𝐹 ∈ V)
18		0ex 5254	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ∅ ∈ V)
20	2, 16, 17, 19, 19	ovmpod 7520	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅)
21	1	reldmmpo 7502	. . 3 ⊢ Rel dom ∘f 𝑅
22	21	ovprc1 7407	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐹 ∈ V → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅)
23	20, 22	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3442   ∩ cin 3902  ∅c0 4287   ↦ cmpt 5181  dom cdm 5632  ‘cfv 6500  (class class class)co 7368   ∈ cmpo 7370   ∘_f cof 7630

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-fv 6508  df-ov 7371  df-oprab 7372  df-mpo 7373  df-of 7632

This theorem is referenced by:  1arithidom  33629