Theorem of0r 32689

Description: Function operation with the empty function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-May-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
of0r	⊢ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅

Proof of Theorem of0r

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-of 7698	. . . 4 ⊢ ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ∘f 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
3		dmeq 5913	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
4		dmeq 5913	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = ∅ → dom 𝑔 = dom ∅)
5	3, 4	ineqan12d 4221	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅) → (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅))
6	5	mpteq1d 5236	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
8		dm0 5930	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ dom ∅ = ∅
9	8	ineq2i 4216	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ ∅)
10		in0 4394	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ ∅) = ∅
11	9, 10	eqtri 2764	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = ∅
12	11	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) = ∅)
13	12	mpteq1d 5236	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom ∅) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))))
14		mpt0 6709	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅
15	14	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅)
16	7, 13, 15	3eqtrd 2780	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = ∅)) → (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥))) = ∅)
17		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → 𝐹 ∈ V)
18		0ex 5306	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
19	18	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ∅ ∈ V)
20	2, 16, 17, 19, 19	ovmpod 7586	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅)
21	1	reldmmpo 7568	. . 3 ⊢ Rel dom ∘f 𝑅
22	21	ovprc1 7471	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐹 ∈ V → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅)
23	20, 22	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅∅) = ∅

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107  Vcvv 3479   ∩ cin 3949  ∅c0 4332   ↦ cmpt 5224  dom cdm 5684  ‘cfv 6560  (class class class)co 7432   ∈ cmpo 7434   ∘_f cof 7696

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5431

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2891  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-sbc 3788  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-op 4632  df-uni 4907  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5225  df-id 5577  df-xp 5690  df-rel 5691  df-cnv 5692  df-co 5693  df-dm 5694  df-iota 6513  df-fun 6562  df-fn 6563  df-fv 6568  df-ov 7435  df-oprab 7436  df-mpo 7437  df-of 7698

This theorem is referenced by:  1arithidom  33566