Theorem strfvi 17374

Description: Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfvi.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
strfvi.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfvi	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfvi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfvi.x	. 2 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)
2		fvi 6962	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = 𝑆)
3	2	eqcomd 2766	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → 𝑆 = ( I ‘𝑆))
4	3	fveq2d 6890	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
5		strfvi.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
6	5	str0 17373	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (𝐸‘∅)
7		fvprc 6878	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = ∅)
8		fvprc 6878	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = ∅)
9	8	fveq2d 6890	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)) = (𝐸‘∅))
10	6, 7, 9	3eqtr4a 2821	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
11	4, 10	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
12	1, 11	eqtri 2783	1 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4278   I cid 5544  ‘cfv 6539  Slot cslot 17365

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fv 6547  df-slot 17366

This theorem is used by:  rlmscaf  21488  islidl  21500  lidlrsppropd  21538  rspsn  21663  ply1tmcl  22597  ply1scltm  22606  ply1sclf  22610  nrgtrg  25015