Theorem strfvi 17288

Description: Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfvi.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
strfvi.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfvi	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfvi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfvi.x	. 2 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)
2		fvi 6958	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = 𝑆)
3	2	eqcomd 2768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → 𝑆 = ( I ‘𝑆))
4	3	fveq2d 6886	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
5		strfvi.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
6	5	str0 17287	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (𝐸‘∅)
7		fvprc 6874	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = ∅)
8		fvprc 6874	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = ∅)
9	8	fveq2d 6886	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)) = (𝐸‘∅))
10	6, 7, 9	3eqtr4a 2823	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
11	4, 10	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
12	1, 11	eqtri 2785	1 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3453  ∅c0 4282   I cid 5553  ‘cfv 6537  Slot cslot 17279

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-slot 17280

This theorem is used by:  rlmscaf  21397  islidl  21409  lidlrsppropd  21447  rspsn  21570  ply1tmcl  22504  ply1scltm  22513  ply1sclf  22517  nrgtrg  24922