Theorem strfvi 17348

Description: Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfvi.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
strfvi.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfvi	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfvi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfvi.x	. 2 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)
2		fvi 6953	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = 𝑆)
3	2	eqcomd 2767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → 𝑆 = ( I ‘𝑆))
4	3	fveq2d 6881	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
5		strfvi.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
6	5	str0 17347	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (𝐸‘∅)
7		fvprc 6869	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = ∅)
8		fvprc 6869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = ∅)
9	8	fveq2d 6881	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)) = (𝐸‘∅))
10	6, 7, 9	3eqtr4a 2822	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
11	4, 10	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
12	1, 11	eqtri 2784	1 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3451  ∅c0 4279   I cid 5545  ‘cfv 6531  Slot cslot 17339

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fv 6539  df-slot 17340

This theorem is used by:  rlmscaf  21462  islidl  21474  lidlrsppropd  21512  rspsn  21637  ply1tmcl  22571  ply1scltm  22580  ply1sclf  22584  nrgtrg  24989