Theorem strfvi 17275

Description: Structure slot extractors cannot distinguish between proper classes and ∅, so they can be protected using the identity function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfvi.e	⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
strfvi.x	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strfvi	⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strfvi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strfvi.x	. 2 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘𝑆)
2		fvi 6964	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = 𝑆)
3	2	eqcomd 2772	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → 𝑆 = ( I ‘𝑆))
4	3	fveq2d 6892	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
5		strfvi.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁
6	5	str0 17274	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ = (𝐸‘∅)
7		fvprc 6880	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = ∅)
8		fvprc 6880	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝑆) = ∅)
9	8	fveq2d 6892	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)) = (𝐸‘∅))
10	6, 7, 9	3eqtr4a 2827	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ V → (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆)))
11	4, 10	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸‘𝑆) = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))
12	1, 11	eqtri 2789	1 ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐸‘( I ‘𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3458  ∅c0 4289   I cid 5560  ‘cfv 6543  Slot cslot 17266

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fv 6551  df-slot 17267

This theorem is used by:  rlmscaf  21365  islidl  21377  lidlrsppropd  21415  rspsn  21538  ply1tmcl  22470  ply1scltm  22479  ply1sclf  22483  nrgtrg  24884