Theorem brpprod3a 36564

Description: Condition for parallel product when the last argument is not an ordered pair. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brpprod3.1	⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V
brpprod3.2	⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V
brpprod3.3	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brpprod3a	⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑧,𝑤,𝑅   𝑤,𝑆,𝑧   𝑤,𝑋,𝑧   𝑤,𝑌,𝑧   𝑤,𝑍,𝑧

Proof of Theorem brpprod3a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pprodss4v 36562	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ pprod(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((V × V) × (V × V))
2	1	brel 5713	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (V × V)))
3	2	simprd 501	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ (V × V))
4		elvv 5723	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤 𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)
5	3, 4	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 → ∃𝑧∃𝑤 𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩)
6	5	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 ↔ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍))
7		19.41vv 1983	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍) ↔ (∃𝑧∃𝑤 𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍))
8	6, 7	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍))
9		breq2 5107	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 ↔ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩))
10	9	pm5.32i 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍) ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩))
11	10	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩))
12		brpprod3.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V
13		brpprod3.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V
14		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
15		vex 3454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
16	12, 13, 14, 15	brpprod 36563	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ↔ (𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤))
17	16	anbi2i 635	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ (𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤)))
18		3anass 1111	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤) ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ (𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤)))
19	17, 18	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ↔ (𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤))
20	19	2exbii 1882	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤))
21	8, 11, 20	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)𝑍 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤(𝑍 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑋𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑌𝑆𝑤))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  Vcvv 3450  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103   × cxp 5646  pprodcpprod 36509

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5543  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-rn 5659  df-res 5660  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6530  df-fn 6531  df-f 6532  df-fo 6534  df-fv 6536  df-1st 7985  df-2nd 7986  df-txp 36532  df-pprod 36533

This theorem is used by:  brpprod3b  36565  brapply  36616  dfrdg4  36631