Theorem caragenval 46909

Description: The sigma-algebra generated by an outer measure. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caragenval	⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Distinct variable group:   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒

Proof of Theorem caragenval

Dummy variable 𝑜 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝑂 ∈ OutMeas)
2		dmexg 7841	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
3	2	uniexd 7685	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
4	3	pwexd 5310	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
5		rabexg 5267	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
7		dmeq 5847	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → dom 𝑜 = dom 𝑂)
8	7	unieqd 4853	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ∪ dom 𝑜 = ∪ dom 𝑂)
9	8	pweqd 4548	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 = 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂)
10	9	raleqdv 3293	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)))
11		fveq1 6828	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)))
12		fveq1 6828	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)))
13	11, 12	oveq12d 7374	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))))
14		fveq1 6828	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘𝑎) = (𝑂‘𝑎))
15	13, 14	eqeq12d 2751	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
16	15	ralbidv 3158	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
17	10, 16	bitrd 279	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
18	9, 17	rabeqbidv 3405	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)} = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
19		df-caragen 46908	. . 3 ⊢ CaraGen = (𝑜 ∈ OutMeas ↦ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)})
20	18, 19	fvmptg 6934	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ OutMeas ∧ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V) → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
21	1, 6, 20	syl2anc 585	1 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3049  {crab 3387  Vcvv 3427   ∖ cdif 3882   ∩ cin 3884  𝒫 cpw 4531  ∪ cuni 4840  dom cdm 5620  ‘cfv 6487  (class class class)co 7356   +_𝑒 cxad 13050  OutMeascome 46905  CaraGenccaragen 46907

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5220  ax-pow 5296  ax-pr 5364  ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3388  df-v 3429  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-nul 4264  df-if 4457  df-pw 4533  df-sn 4558  df-pr 4560  df-op 4564  df-uni 4841  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5156  df-id 5515  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627  df-cnv 5628  df-co 5629  df-dm 5630  df-rn 5631  df-iota 6443  df-fun 6489  df-fv 6495  df-ov 7359  df-caragen 46908

This theorem is referenced by:  caragenel  46911  caragenss  46920  caratheodory  46944