Theorem caragenval 46936

Description: The sigma-algebra generated by an outer measure. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caragenval	⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Distinct variable group:   𝑂,𝑎,𝑒

Proof of Theorem caragenval

Dummy variable 𝑜 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝑂 ∈ OutMeas)
2		dmexg 7841	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
3	2	uniexd 7685	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
4	3	pwexd 5308	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V)
5		rabexg 5265	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V)
7		dmeq 5845	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → dom 𝑜 = dom 𝑂)
8	7	unieqd 4851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ∪ dom 𝑜 = ∪ dom 𝑂)
9	8	pweqd 4546	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 = 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂)
10	9	raleqdv 3297	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)))
11		fveq1 6826	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)))
12		fveq1 6826	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)) = (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒)))
13	11, 12	oveq12d 7374	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → ((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))))
14		fveq1 6826	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (𝑜‘𝑎) = (𝑂‘𝑎))
15	13, 14	eqeq12d 2755	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
16	15	ralbidv 3162	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
17	10, 16	bitrd 280	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)))
18	9, 17	rabeqbidv 3409	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑜 = 𝑂 → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)} = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
19		df-caragen 46935	. . 3 ⊢ CaraGen = (𝑜 ∈ OutMeas ↦ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑜((𝑜‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑜‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑜‘𝑎)})
20	18, 19	fvmptg 6933	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑂 ∈ OutMeas ∧ {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)} ∈ V) → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})
21	1, 6, 20	syl2anc 590	1 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ OutMeas → (CaraGen‘𝑂) = {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂 ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ dom 𝑂((𝑂‘(𝑎 ∩ 𝑒)) +𝑒 (𝑂‘(𝑎 ∖ 𝑒))) = (𝑂‘𝑎)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3053  {crab 3391  Vcvv 3431   ∖ cdif 3880   ∩ cin 3882  𝒫 cpw 4529  ∪ cuni 4838  dom cdm 5618  ‘cfv 6485  (class class class)co 7356   +_𝑒 cxad 13052  OutMeascome 46932  CaraGenccaragen 46934

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pow 5294  ax-pr 5362  ax-un 7678

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-pw 4531  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5513  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625  df-cnv 5626  df-co 5627  df-dm 5628  df-rn 5629  df-iota 6441  df-fun 6487  df-fv 6493  df-ov 7359  df-caragen 46935

This theorem is referenced by:  caragenel  46938  caragenss  46947  caratheodory  46971