Theorem cfilss 25603

Description: A filter finer than a Cauchy filter is Cauchy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cfilss	⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷))

Proof of Theorem cfilss

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 783	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋))
2		simprr 785	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)
3		iscfil 25598	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))))
4	3	simplbda 505	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))
5	4	adantr 486	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))
6		ssrexv 3982	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥)))
7	6	ralimdv 3179	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥)))
8	2, 5, 7	sylc 66	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))
9		iscfil 25598	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) → (𝐺 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))))
10	9	ad2antrr 739	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → (𝐺 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐷 “ (𝑦 × 𝑦)) ⊆ (0[,)𝑥))))
11	1, 8, 10	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺)) → 𝐺 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   ⊆ wss 3899   × cxp 5652   “ cima 5657  ‘cfv 6546  (class class class)co 7427  0cc0 11210  ℝ⁺crp 13130  [,)cico 13488  ∞Metcxmet 21675  Filcfil 24176  CauFilccfil 25585

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5262  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5394  ax-un 7758  ax-cnex 11266  ax-resscn 11267

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3742  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5549  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fn 6549  df-f 6550  df-fv 6554  df-ov 7430  df-oprab 7431  df-mpo 7432  df-map 8860  df-xr 11357  df-xmet 21683  df-cfil 25588

This theorem is used by: (None)