Theorem dmcuts 28182

Description: The domain of the surreal cut operation is all separated surreal sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcuts	⊢ dom |s = <<s

Proof of Theorem dmcuts

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmoprab 7523	. 2 ⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))} = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
2		df-cuts 28151	. . . 4 ⊢ |s = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No, 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
3		df-mpo 7425	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No, 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
4	2, 3	eqtri 2783	. . 3 ⊢ |s = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
5	4	dmeqi 5885	. 2 ⊢ dom |s = dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
6		df-slts 28149	. . . . 5 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ No ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥 <s 𝑦)}
7	6	relopabiv 5797	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel <<s
8		19.42v 1985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
9		sltsss1 28156	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ⊆ No)
10		velpw 4561	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ No)
11	9, 10	sylibr 237	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No)
12	11	pm4.71ri 570	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
13		vex 3454	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
14		vex 3454	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑏 ∈ V
15	13, 14	elimasn 6087	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
16		df-br 5103	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
17	15, 16	bitr4i 281	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏)
18	17	anbi2i 635	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
19		riotaex 7381	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) ∈ V
20	19	isseti 3468	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))
21	20	biantru 539	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
22	12, 18, 21	3bitr2i 302	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
23	8, 22, 16	3bitr2ri 303	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
24	23	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))))
25	7, 24	opabbi2dv 5826	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))})
26	25	mptru 1576	. 2 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
27	1, 5, 26	3eqtr4i 2793	1 ⊢ dom |s = <<s

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569  ⊤wtru 1570  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  {crab 3412   ⊆ wss 3895  𝒫 cpw 4556  {csn 4584  ⟨cop 4834  ∩ cint 4906   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166  dom cdm 5650   “ cima 5653  ‘cfv 6538  ℩crio 7376  {coprab 7421   ∈ cmpo 7422  Nocsur 28002   <s clts 28003  bdaycbday 28004   <<s cslts 28148   |s ccuts 28150

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-dm 5660  df-rn 5661  df-res 5662  df-ima 5663  df-iota 6494  df-riota 7377  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-slts 28149  df-cuts 28151

This theorem is used by:  cutsf  28183  madeval2  28224