Theorem dmcuts 28207

Description: The domain of the surreal cut operation is all separated surreal sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmcuts	⊢ dom |s = <<s

Proof of Theorem dmcuts

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmoprab 7546	. 2 ⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))} = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
2		df-cuts 28176	. . . 4 ⊢ |s = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No, 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
3		df-mpo 7448	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No, 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
4	2, 3	eqtri 2786	. . 3 ⊢ |s = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
5	4	dmeqi 5893	. 2 ⊢ dom |s = dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
6		df-slts 28174	. . . . 5 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ No ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥 <s 𝑦)}
7	6	relopabi 5805	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel <<s
8		19.42v 1988	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
9		sltsss1 28181	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ⊆ No)
10		velpw 4565	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ No)
11	9, 10	sylibr 237	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No)
12	11	pm4.71ri 570	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
13		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
14		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑏 ∈ V
15	13, 14	elimasn 6100	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
16		df-br 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
17	15, 16	bitr4i 281	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏)
18	17	anbi2i 635	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
19		riotaex 7404	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) ∈ V
20	19	isseti 3472	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))
21	20	biantru 539	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
22	12, 18, 21	3bitr2i 302	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
23	8, 22, 16	3bitr2ri 303	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
24	23	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))))
25	7, 24	opabbi2dv 5833	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))})
26	25	mptru 1577	. 2 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} (bday‘𝑥) = ∩ (bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
27	1, 5, 26	3eqtr4i 2796	1 ⊢ dom |s = <<s

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ⊤wtru 1571  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  𝒫 cpw 4560  {csn 4588  ⟨cop 4838  ∩ cint 4910   class class class wbr 5106  {copab 5170  dom cdm 5655   “ cima 5658  ‘cfv 6558  ℩crio 7399  {coprab 7444   ∈ cmpo 7445  Nocsur 28027   <s clts 28028  bdaycbday 28029   <<s cslts 28173   |s ccuts 28175

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-riota 7400  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-slts 28174  df-cuts 28176

This theorem is used by:  cutsf  28208  madeval2  28249