Theorem f1omvdmvd 19666

Description: A permutation of any class moves a point which is moved to a different point which is moved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1omvdmvd	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem f1omvdmvd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
2		f1ofn 6830	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3		difss 4071	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹
4		dmss 5885	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹
6		f1odm 6833	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sseqtrid 3951	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐴)
8	7	sselda 3909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
9		fnelnfp 7186	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
10	2, 8, 9	syl2an2r 698	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
11	1, 10	mpbid 235	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋)
12		f1of1 6828	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
13	12	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
14		f1of 6829	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
15	14	adantr 486	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
16	15, 8	ffvelcdmd 7090	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
17		f1fveq 7270	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
18	13, 16, 8, 17	syl12anc 850	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
19	18	necon3bid 2999	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
20	11, 19	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋))
21		fnelnfp 7186	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
22	2, 16, 21	syl2an2r 698	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
23	20, 22	mpbird 260	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
24		eldifsn 4744	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
25	23, 11, 24	sylanbrc 595	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2955   ⊆ wss 3896   ∖ cdif 4044  {csn 4584   I cid 5545  dom cdm 5651   Fn wfn 6538  ⟶wf 6539  –1-1→wf1 6540  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6542  ‘cfv 6543

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-iota 6497  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551

This theorem is used by:  f1otrspeq  19670  symggen  19693  pmtrcnel  33700  pmtrcnelor  33702