Theorem fcoinver 30847

Description: Build an equivalence relation from a function. Two values are equivalent if they have the same image by the function. See also fcoinvbr 30848. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
fcoinver	⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) Er 𝑋)

Proof of Theorem fcoinver

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relco 6137	. . 3 ⊢ Rel (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)
2	1	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → Rel (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
3		dmco 6147	. . 3 ⊢ dom (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) = (◡𝐹 “ dom ◡𝐹)
4		df-rn 5591	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran 𝐹 = dom ◡𝐹
5	4	imaeq2i 5956	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡𝐹 “ ran 𝐹) = (◡𝐹 “ dom ◡𝐹)
6		cnvimarndm 5979	. . . . 5 ⊢ (◡𝐹 “ ran 𝐹) = dom 𝐹
7		fndm 6520	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → dom 𝐹 = 𝑋)
8	6, 7	syl5eq 2791	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡𝐹 “ ran 𝐹) = 𝑋)
9	5, 8	eqtr3id 2793	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡𝐹 “ dom ◡𝐹) = 𝑋)
10	3, 9	syl5eq 2791	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → dom (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) = 𝑋)
11		cnvco 5783	. . . . 5 ⊢ ◡(◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) = (◡𝐹 ∘ ◡◡𝐹)
12		cnvcnvss 6086	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ◡◡𝐹 ⊆ 𝐹
13		coss2 5754	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (◡◡𝐹 ⊆ 𝐹 → (◡𝐹 ∘ ◡◡𝐹) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (◡𝐹 ∘ ◡◡𝐹) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)
15	11, 14	eqsstri 3951	. . . 4 ⊢ ◡(◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)
16	15	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → ◡(◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
17		coass 6158	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)) = (◡𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)))
18		coass 6158	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐹) ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐹 ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
19		fnfun 6517	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → Fun 𝐹)
20		funcocnv2 6724	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐹) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐹))
21	19, 20	syl 17	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐹) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐹))
22	21	coeq1d 5759	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → ((𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐹) ∘ 𝐹) = (( I ↾ ran 𝐹) ∘ 𝐹))
23		dffn3 6597	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 ↔ 𝐹:𝑋⟶ran 𝐹)
24		fcoi2 6633	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑋⟶ran 𝐹 → (( I ↾ ran 𝐹) ∘ 𝐹) = 𝐹)
25	23, 24	sylbi 216	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (( I ↾ ran 𝐹) ∘ 𝐹) = 𝐹)
26	22, 25	eqtrd 2778	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → ((𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐹) ∘ 𝐹) = 𝐹)
27	18, 26	eqtr3id 2793	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (𝐹 ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)) = 𝐹)
28	27	coeq2d 5760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) = (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
29	17, 28	syl5eq 2791	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)) = (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
30		ssid 3939	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)
31	29, 30	eqsstrdi 3971	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
32	16, 31	unssd 4116	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡(◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∪ ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
33		df-er 8456	. 2 ⊢ ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) Er 𝑋 ↔ (Rel (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∧ dom (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) = 𝑋 ∧ (◡(◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∪ ((◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) ∘ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) ⊆ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)))
34	2, 10, 32, 33	syl3anbrc 1341	1 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝑋 → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐹) Er 𝑋)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∪ cun 3881   ⊆ wss 3883   I cid 5479  ^◡ccnv 5579  dom cdm 5580  ran crn 5581   ↾ cres 5582   “ cima 5583   ∘ ccom 5584  Rel wrel 5585  Fun wfun 6412   Fn wfn 6413  ⟶wf 6414   Er wer 8453

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-er 8456

This theorem is referenced by:  qtophaus  31688