MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fifo Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem fifo 9347
Description: Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
fifo.1 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fifo (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑉
Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem fifo
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eldifsni 4748 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
2 intex 5291 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ V)
31, 2sylib 218 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ∈ V)
43rgen 3054 . . . 4 𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V
5 fifo.1 . . . . 5 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
65fnmpt 6640 . . . 4 (∀𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V → 𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
74, 6mp1i 13 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
8 dffn4 6760 . . 3 (𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
97, 8sylib 218 . 2 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
10 elfi2 9329 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
115elrnmpt 5915 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
1211elv 3447 . . . . 5 (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦)
1310, 12bitr4di 289 . . . 4 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹))
1413eqrdv 2735 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹)
15 foeq3 6752 . . 3 ((fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
1614, 15syl 17 . 2 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
179, 16mpbird 257 1 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206   = wceq 1542  wcel 2114  wne 2933  wral 3052  wrex 3062  Vcvv 3442  cdif 3900  cin 3902  c0 4287  𝒫 cpw 4556  {csn 4582   cint 4904  cmpt 5181  ran crn 5633   Fn wfn 6495  ontowfo 6498  cfv 6500  Fincfn 8895  ficfi 9325
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-pow 5312  ax-pr 5379  ax-un 7690
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-int 4905  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fn 6503  df-fo 6506  df-fv 6508  df-fi 9326
This theorem is referenced by:  inffien  9985  fictb  10166
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator