MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fifo Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem fifo 9390
Description: Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
fifo.1 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fifo (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑉
Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem fifo
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eldifsni 4757 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
2 intex 5302 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ V)
31, 2sylib 218 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ∈ V)
43rgen 3047 . . . 4 𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V
5 fifo.1 . . . . 5 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
65fnmpt 6661 . . . 4 (∀𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V → 𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
74, 6mp1i 13 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
8 dffn4 6781 . . 3 (𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
97, 8sylib 218 . 2 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
10 elfi2 9372 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
115elrnmpt 5925 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
1211elv 3455 . . . . 5 (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦)
1310, 12bitr4di 289 . . . 4 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹))
1413eqrdv 2728 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹)
15 foeq3 6773 . . 3 ((fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
1614, 15syl 17 . 2 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
179, 16mpbird 257 1 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206   = wceq 1540  wcel 2109  wne 2926  wral 3045  wrex 3054  Vcvv 3450  cdif 3914  cin 3916  c0 4299  𝒫 cpw 4566  {csn 4592   cint 4913  cmpt 5191  ran crn 5642   Fn wfn 6509  ontowfo 6512  cfv 6514  Fincfn 8921  ficfi 9368
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5323  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-int 4914  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-fo 6520  df-fv 6522  df-fi 9369
This theorem is referenced by:  inffien  10023  fictb  10204
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator