MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  fifo Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem fifo 9345
Description: Describe a surjection from nonempty finite sets to finite intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
fifo.1 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
Assertion
Ref Expression
fifo (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑉
Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem fifo
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eldifsni 4735 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ≠ ∅)
2 intex 5285 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ V)
31, 2sylib 218 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) → 𝑦 ∈ V)
43rgen 3053 . . . 4 𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V
5 fifo.1 . . . . 5 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↦ 𝑦)
65fnmpt 6638 . . . 4 (∀𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) 𝑦 ∈ V → 𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
74, 6mp1i 13 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}))
8 dffn4 6758 . . 3 (𝐹 Fn ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅}) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
97, 8sylib 218 . 2 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹)
10 elfi2 9327 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
115elrnmpt 5913 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦))
1211elv 3434 . . . . 5 (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})𝑥 = 𝑦)
1310, 12bitr4di 289 . . . 4 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ (fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹))
1413eqrdv 2734 . . 3 (𝐴𝑉 → (fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹)
15 foeq3 6750 . . 3 ((fi‘𝐴) = ran 𝐹 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
1614, 15syl 17 . 2 (𝐴𝑉 → (𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→ran 𝐹))
179, 16mpbird 257 1 (𝐴𝑉𝐹:((𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})–onto→(fi‘𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 206   = wceq 1542  wcel 2114  wne 2932  wral 3051  wrex 3061  Vcvv 3429  cdif 3886  cin 3888  c0 4273  𝒫 cpw 4541  {csn 4567   cint 4889  cmpt 5166  ran crn 5632   Fn wfn 6493  ontowfo 6496  cfv 6498  Fincfn 8893  ficfi 9323
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-int 4890  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-fo 6504  df-fv 6506  df-fi 9324
This theorem is referenced by:  inffien  9985  fictb  10166
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator