Theorem limuni3 7788

Description: The union of a nonempty class of limit ordinals is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limuni3	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem limuni3

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limeq 6329	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (Lim 𝑥 ↔ Lim 𝑧))
2	1	rspcv 3577	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Lim 𝑧))
3		vex 3449	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4		limelon 6381	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ On)
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ On)
6	2, 5	syl6com 37	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ On))
7	6	ssrdv 3950	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ On)
8		ssorduni 7713	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
10	9	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
11		n0 4306	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
12		0ellim 6380	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ 𝑧)
13		elunii 4870	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
14	13	expcom 414	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
15	12, 14	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
16	2, 15	syld 47	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
17	16	exlimiv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
18	11, 17	sylbi 216	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
19	18	imp 407	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
20		eluni2 4869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
21	1	rspccv 3578	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → Lim 𝑧))
22		limsuc 7785	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
23	22	anbi1d 630	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))
24		elunii 4870	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
25	23, 24	syl6bi 252	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
26	25	expd 416	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
27	26	com3r 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
28	21, 27	sylcom 30	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
29	28	rexlimdv 3150	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
30	20, 29	biimtrid 241	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
31	30	ralrimiv 3142	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
32	31	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
33		dflim4 7784	. 2 ⊢ (Lim ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (Ord ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
34	10, 19, 32, 33	syl3anbrc 1343	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2943  ∀wral 3064  ∃wrex 3073  Vcvv 3445   ⊆ wss 3910  ∅c0 4282  ∪ cuni 4865  Ord word 6316  Oncon0 6317  Lim wlim 6318  suc csuc 6319

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5384  ax-un 7672

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3065  df-rex 3074  df-rab 3408  df-v 3447  df-dif 3913  df-un 3915  df-in 3917  df-ss 3927  df-pss 3929  df-nul 4283  df-if 4487  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4587  df-pr 4589  df-op 4593  df-uni 4866  df-br 5106  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5223  df-eprel 5537  df-po 5545  df-so 5546  df-fr 5588  df-we 5590  df-ord 6320  df-on 6321  df-lim 6322  df-suc 6323

This theorem is referenced by: (None)