Theorem limuni3 7872

Description: The union of a nonempty class of limit ordinals is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limuni3	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem limuni3

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limeq 6397	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (Lim 𝑥 ↔ Lim 𝑧))
2	1	rspcv 3617	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Lim 𝑧))
3		vex 3481	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4		limelon 6449	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ On)
5	3, 4	mpan 690	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ On)
6	2, 5	syl6com 37	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ On))
7	6	ssrdv 4000	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ On)
8		ssorduni 7797	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
10	9	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
11		n0 4358	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
12		0ellim 6448	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ 𝑧)
13		elunii 4916	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
14	13	expcom 413	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
15	12, 14	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
16	2, 15	syld 47	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
17	16	exlimiv 1927	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
18	11, 17	sylbi 217	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
19	18	imp 406	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
20		eluni2 4915	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
21	1	rspccv 3618	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → Lim 𝑧))
22		limsuc 7869	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
23	22	anbi1d 631	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))
24		elunii 4916	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
25	23, 24	biimtrdi 253	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
26	25	expd 415	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
27	26	com3r 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
28	21, 27	sylcom 30	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
29	28	rexlimdv 3150	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
30	20, 29	biimtrid 242	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
31	30	ralrimiv 3142	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
32	31	adantl 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
33		dflim4 7868	. 2 ⊢ (Lim ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (Ord ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
34	10, 19, 32, 33	syl3anbrc 1342	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∃wex 1775   ∈ wcel 2105   ≠ wne 2937  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067  Vcvv 3477   ⊆ wss 3962  ∅c0 4338  ∪ cuni 4911  Ord word 6384  Oncon0 6385  Lim wlim 6386  suc csuc 6387

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2705  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pr 5437  ax-un 7753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-sb 2062  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-pss 3982  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-tr 5265  df-eprel 5588  df-po 5596  df-so 5597  df-fr 5640  df-we 5642  df-ord 6388  df-on 6389  df-lim 6390  df-suc 6391

This theorem is referenced by: (None)