Theorem limuni3 7837

Description: The union of a nonempty class of limit ordinals is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limuni3	⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem limuni3

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limeq 6373	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (Lim 𝑥 ↔ Lim 𝑧))
2	1	rspcv 3608	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Lim 𝑧))
3		vex 3478	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
4		limelon 6425	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ On)
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ On)
6	2, 5	syl6com 37	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ On))
7	6	ssrdv 3987	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → 𝐴 ⊆ On)
8		ssorduni 7762	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
9	7, 8	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
10	9	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
11		n0 4345	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
12		0ellim 6424	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ 𝑧)
13		elunii 4912	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
14	13	expcom 414	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
15	12, 14	syl5 34	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
16	2, 15	syld 47	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
17	16	exlimiv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
18	11, 17	sylbi 216	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
19	18	imp 407	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
20		eluni2 4911	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
21	1	rspccv 3609	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → Lim 𝑧))
22		limsuc 7834	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
23	22	anbi1d 630	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)))
24		elunii 4912	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
25	23, 24	syl6bi 252	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
26	25	expd 416	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
27	26	com3r 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (Lim 𝑧 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
28	21, 27	sylcom 30	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)))
29	28	rexlimdv 3153	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
30	20, 29	biimtrid 241	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
31	30	ralrimiv 3145	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
32	31	adantl 482	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴)
33		dflim4 7833	. 2 ⊢ (Lim ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (Ord ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 suc 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴))
34	10, 19, 32, 33	syl3anbrc 1343	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  Vcvv 3474   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4321  ∪ cuni 4907  Ord word 6360  Oncon0 6361  Lim wlim 6362  suc csuc 6363

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7721

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-pss 3966  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-tr 5265  df-eprel 5579  df-po 5587  df-so 5588  df-fr 5630  df-we 5632  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367

This theorem is referenced by: (None)