Theorem permaxsep 45774

Description: The Axiom of Separation ax-sep 5259 holds in permutation models. Part of Exercise II.9.2 of [Kunen2] p. 148.

Note that, to prove that an instance of Separation holds in the model, 𝜑 would need have all instances of ∈ replaced with 𝑅. But this still results in an instance of this theorem, so we do establish that Separation holds. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
permmodel.1	⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V
permmodel.2	⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
permaxsep	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑦,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem permaxsep

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvex 6898	. 2 ⊢ (◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ∈ V
2		nfcv 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥◡𝐹
3		nfrab1 3438	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}
4	2, 3	nffv 6895	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑})
5	4	nfeq2 2944	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = (◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑})
6		breq2 5115	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = (◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑})))
7	6	bibi1d 346	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = (◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
8	5, 7	albid 2261	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = (◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) → (∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
9		permmodel.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V
10		permmodel.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )
11		vex 3461	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
12		fvex 6898	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V
13	12	rabex 5311	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V
14	9, 10, 11, 13	brpermmodelcnv 45771	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑})
15		rabid 3439	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∧ 𝜑))
16		vex 3461	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
17	9, 10, 11, 16	brpermmodel 45770	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧))
18	17	bicomi 227	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
19	15, 18	bianbi 639	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
20	14, 19	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
21	20	ax-gen 1828	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅(◡𝐹‘{𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑧) ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
22	1, 8, 21	ceqsexv2d 3506	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3418  Vcvv 3457   class class class wbr 5111   E cep 5562  ^◡ccnv 5662   ∘ ccom 5667  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  ‘cfv 6540

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-eprel 5563  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548

This theorem is used by: (None)