| Mathbox for Eric Schmidt |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > brpermmodel | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The membership relation in a permutation model. We use a permutation 𝐹 of the universe to define a relation 𝑅 that serves as the membership relation in our model. The conclusion of this theorem is Definition II.9.1 of [Kunen2] p. 148. All the axioms of ZFC except for Regularity hold in permutation models, and Regularity will be false if 𝐹 is chosen appropriately. Thus, permutation models can be used to show that Regularity does not follow from the other axioms (with the usual proviso that the axioms are consistent). (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| permmodel.1 | ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V |
| permmodel.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E ) |
| brpermmodel.3 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
| brpermmodel.4 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brpermmodel | ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | epel 5527 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 E 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) | |
| 2 | vex 3444 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
| 3 | brpermmodel.4 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | brcnv 5831 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | anbi12i 628 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 6 | 5 | exbii 1849 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 7 | permmodel.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E ) | |
| 8 | 7 | breqi 5104 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(◡𝐹 ∘ E )𝐵) |
| 9 | brpermmodel.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
| 10 | 9, 3 | brco 5819 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴(◡𝐹 ∘ E )𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵)) |
| 12 | permmodel.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V | |
| 13 | f1ofn 6775 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V → 𝐹 Fn V) | |
| 14 | 12, 13 | ax-mp 5 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn V |
| 15 | fneu 6602 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥) | |
| 16 | 14, 3, 15 | mp2an 692 | . . 3 ⊢ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥 |
| 17 | eleq1 2824 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) | |
| 18 | 17 | anbi1d 631 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 19 | 18 | exbidv 1922 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 20 | 19 | anbi1d 631 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 21 | fv3 6852 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥)} | |
| 22 | 9, 20, 21 | elab2 3637 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 23 | 16, 22 | mpbiran2 710 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 24 | 6, 11, 23 | 3bitr4i 303 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∃wex 1780 ∈ wcel 2113 ∃!weu 2568 Vcvv 3440 class class class wbr 5098 E cep 5523 ◡ccnv 5623 ∘ ccom 5628 Fn wfn 6487 –1-1-onto→wf1o 6491 ‘cfv 6492 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2146 ax-11 2162 ax-12 2184 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5241 ax-nul 5251 ax-pr 5377 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2811 df-ne 2933 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rab 3400 df-v 3442 df-dif 3904 df-un 3906 df-ss 3918 df-nul 4286 df-if 4480 df-sn 4581 df-pr 4583 df-op 4587 df-uni 4864 df-br 5099 df-opab 5161 df-id 5519 df-eprel 5524 df-xp 5630 df-rel 5631 df-cnv 5632 df-co 5633 df-dm 5634 df-iota 6448 df-fun 6494 df-fn 6495 df-f 6496 df-f1 6497 df-f1o 6499 df-fv 6500 |
| This theorem is referenced by: brpermmodelcnv 45245 permaxext 45246 permaxrep 45247 permaxsep 45248 permaxpow 45250 permaxun 45252 permaxinf2lem 45253 permac8prim 45255 nregmodellem 45257 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |