| Mathbox for Eric Schmidt |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > brpermmodel | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The membership relation in a permutation model. We use a permutation 𝐹 of the universe to define a relation 𝑅 that serves as the membership relation in our model. The conclusion of this theorem is Definition II.9.1 of [Kunen2] p. 148. All the axioms of ZFC except for Regularity hold in permutation models, and Regularity will be false if 𝐹 is chosen appropriately. Thus, permutation models can be used to show that Regularity does not follow from the other axioms (with the usual proviso that the axioms are consistent). (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 6-Nov-2025.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| permmodel.1 | ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V |
| permmodel.2 | ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E ) |
| brpermmodel.3 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
| brpermmodel.4 | ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| brpermmodel | ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | epel 5564 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 E 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) | |
| 2 | vex 3459 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
| 3 | brpermmodel.4 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | brcnv 5868 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝐹𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | anbi12i 639 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 6 | 5 | exbii 1878 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 7 | permmodel.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E ) | |
| 8 | 7 | breqi 5115 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(◡𝐹 ∘ E )𝐵) |
| 9 | brpermmodel.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
| 10 | 9, 3 | brco 5856 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴(◡𝐹 ∘ E )𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵)) |
| 11 | 8, 10 | bitri 278 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 E 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥◡𝐹𝐵)) |
| 12 | permmodel.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V | |
| 13 | f1ofn 6821 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:V–1-1-onto→V → 𝐹 Fn V) | |
| 14 | 12, 13 | ax-mp 5 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 Fn V |
| 15 | fneu 6645 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥) | |
| 16 | 14, 3, 15 | mp2an 704 | . . 3 ⊢ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥 |
| 17 | eleq1 2851 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) | |
| 18 | 17 | anbi1d 642 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 19 | 18 | exbidv 1951 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 20 | 19 | anbi1d 642 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥))) |
| 21 | fv3 6899 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ (∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥)} | |
| 22 | 9, 20, 21 | elab2 3641 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ (∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥) ∧ ∃!𝑥 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 23 | 16, 22 | mpbiran2 722 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝐹𝑥)) |
| 24 | 6, 11, 23 | 3bitr4i 306 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1570 ∃wex 1809 ∈ wcel 2143 ∃!weu 2596 Vcvv 3455 class class class wbr 5109 E cep 5560 ◡ccnv 5660 ∘ ccom 5665 Fn wfn 6531 –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535 ‘cfv 6536 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5257 ax-pr 5404 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-id 5556 df-eprel 5561 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-f1 6541 df-f1o 6543 df-fv 6544 |
| This theorem is referenced by: brpermmodelcnv 45713 permaxext 45714 permaxrep 45715 permaxsep 45716 permaxpow 45718 permaxun 45720 permaxinf2lem 45721 permac8prim 45723 nregmodellem 45725 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |