P. 450 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

trintALT 44901*

The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 44901 is an alternate proof of trint 5277. trintALT 44901 is trintALTVD 44900 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 44900 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program "MM-PA> MINIMIZE_WITH *" command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)

Theorem

undif3VD 44902

The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual deduction proof of undif3 4300. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. undif3 4300 is undif3VD 44902 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from undif3VD 44902.

1::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
2::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3:2:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4:1,3:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
5::	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
7:5:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))   )
9:8:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ( ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
10::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐵   )
12:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶    )
13:11:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)   )
14:12:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
15:13,14:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))   )
16:15:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
17:9,16:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
18::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
20:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶    )
21:18:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
22:21:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
23::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
25:24:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
26:25:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
27:10:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
28:27:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
29::	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   )
30:29:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝐴   )
31:30:	⊢ (   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))   )
32:31:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
33:22,26:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
34:28,32:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
35:33,34:	⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
36::	⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
37:36,35:	⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
38:17,37:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
39::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
40:39:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
41::	⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
42:40,41:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
43::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ))
44:43,42:	⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
45::	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
46:45,44:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
47:4,38:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
48:46,47:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
49:48:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
qed:49:	⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Theorem

sbcssgVD 44903

Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4520. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcssg 4520 is sbcssgVD 44903 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcssgVD 44903.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ))   )
5:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )   )
11::	⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
110:11:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
12:1,110:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
13:10,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
14::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀ 𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

Theorem

csbingVD 44904

Virtual deduction proof of csbin 4442. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbin 4442 is csbingVD 44904 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbingVD 44904.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) }
20:2:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}
30:1,20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
3:1,30:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)}   )
6:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ))   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))   )
10:9,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}   )
13:5,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}   )
14::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = { 𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐵   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))

Theorem

onfrALTlem5VD 44905*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 44562. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem5 44562 is onfrALTlem5VD 44905 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 44905.

1::	⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
3:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
4:3:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
5::	⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) = ∅)
6:4,5:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
7:2:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
8::	⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
9:8:	⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
10:2,9:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
11:7,10:	⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
12:6,11:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
13:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
14:12,13:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
15:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
16:15,14:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
17:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ( ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
18:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
19:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
20:18,19:	⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
21:17,20:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
22:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌ ∅)
23:2:	⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
24:21,23:	⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
25:22,24:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
26:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
27:25,26:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
28:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
29:27,28:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
30:29:	⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
31:30:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
32::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ))
33:31,32:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
34:2:	⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ( 𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
35:33,34:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)
36::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
37:36:	⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
38:2,37:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
39:35,38:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
40:16,39:	⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
41:2:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
qed:40,41:	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 )((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

Theorem

onfrALTlem4VD 44906*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 44563. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem4 44563 is onfrALTlem4VD 44906 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 44906.

1::	⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
2:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋ 𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
3:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌ 𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
4:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
5:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
6:4,5:	⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
7:3,6:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
8:1:	⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
9:7,8:	⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌ ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
10:2,9:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
11:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
12:11,10:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
13:1:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
qed:13,12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))

Theorem

onfrALTlem3VD 44907*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 44564. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem3 44564 is onfrALTlem3VD 44907 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 44907.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   )
4:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ⊆ On   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ On   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Ord 𝑥   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E We 𝑥   )
8::	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
9:7,8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶    E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
12::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
13:12,8:	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
14:13,11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
15::	⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)( (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
16:14,15:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ( 𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
17::	⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
18:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅   )
20:17,19:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)   )
qed:16,20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

simplbi2comtVD 44908

Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 501. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. simplbi2comt 501 is simplbi2comtVD 44908 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 44908.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))   )
4:3:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))   ▶   (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))   )
qed:4:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

Theorem

onfrALTlem2VD 44909*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 44566. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem2 44566 is onfrALTlem2VD 44909 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 44909.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑎   )
4::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
5::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   )
7:4:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ⊆ On   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   𝑥 ∈ On   )
9:8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Ord 𝑥   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   Tr 𝑥   )
11:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑥   )
13:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
14:10,12,13:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑥   )
15:3,14:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
16:13,15:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦))   ▶   𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦))   )
18:17:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦))   )
19:18:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)   )
20::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
22:19,21:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
23:20:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝑎   )
25:22,24:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
26:25:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
28:27:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥 ) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))   )
29::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦 ) = ∅   )
30:29:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
31:28,30:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
qed:31:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

onfrALTlem1VD 44910*

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 44568. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem1 44568 is onfrALTlem1VD 44910 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 44910.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)    )
4::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5:4:	⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
6:5:	⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7:3,6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
8::	⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
qed:7,8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )

Theorem

onfrALTVD 44911

Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 44569. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALT 44569 is onfrALTVD 44911 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTVD 44911.

1::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
3:1:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
4:2:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
5::	⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
6:5,4,3:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝑎   ▶    ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
7:6:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
10::	⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
11:9,10:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)   )
12::	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   𝑎 ≠ ∅   )
14:13,11:	⊢ (   (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅)   ▶   ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅   )
15:14:	⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
16:15:	⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
qed:16:	⊢ E Fr On

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ E Fr On

Theorem

csbeq2gVD 44912

Virtual deduction proof of csbeq2 3904. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbeq2 3904 is csbeq2gVD 44912 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbeq2gVD 44912.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥] 𝐵 = 𝐶)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥 ⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:4:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbsngVD 44913

Virtual deduction proof of csbsng 4708. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbsng 4708 is csbsngVD 44913 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbsngVD 44913.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
8:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵} = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
10::	⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
11:10:	⊢ ∀𝑥{𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
12:1,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}   )
13:9,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { 𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
14::	⊢ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
15:13,14:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
qed:15:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})

Theorem

csbxpgVD 44914

Virtual deduction proof of csbxp 5785. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbxp 5785 is csbxpgVD 44914 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbxpgVD 44914.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 = 𝑤   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
9:6,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
10:5,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))   )
11:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))   )
12:10,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))   )
13:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩)   )
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
15:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
16:14,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
17:16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
18:17:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
19:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
20:18,19:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
22:21:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
23:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)))   )
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
25:24:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)))   )
26:25:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}    )
27:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥] ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}   )
28:26,27:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃ 𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦( 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}    )
29::	⊢ {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
30::	⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
31:29,30:	⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
32:31:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
33:1,32:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}   )
34:28,33:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}   )
35::	⊢ {⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
36::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = { ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)}
37:35,36:	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
38:34,37:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:38:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbresgVD 44915

Virtual deduction proof of csbres 6000. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbres 6000 is csbresgVD 44915 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbresgVD 44915.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V = V   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V)   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V))   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
9::	⊢ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
10:9:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
11:1,10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))   )
12:8,11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))   )
13::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)   )
qed:14:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))

Theorem

csbrngVD 44916

Virtual deduction proof of csbrn 6223. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbrn 6223 is csbrngVD 44916 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbrngVD 44916.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
8:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤   ,    𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨ 𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
12:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}   )
13:11,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤 ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
14::	⊢ ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
15:14:	⊢ ∀𝑥ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤   ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
16:1,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}   )
17:13,16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
18::	⊢ ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤    ,   𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
19:17,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵   )
qed:19:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

Theorem

csbima12gALTVD 44917

Virtual deduction proof of csbima12 6097. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbima12 6097 is csbima12gALTVD 44917 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbima12gALTVD 44917.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶    ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
6::	⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
7:6:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
8:1,7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)   )
9:5,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
10::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
11:9,10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ( ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
qed:11:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋ 𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

Theorem

csbunigVD 44918

Virtual deduction proof of csbuni 4936. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbuni 4936 is csbunigVD 44918 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbunigVD 44918.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
5:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
9:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
13:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}    )
14:12,13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
15::	⊢ ∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
16:15:	⊢ ∀𝑥∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
17:1,16:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   [𝐴 / 𝑥]∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}   )
18:1,17:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}   )
19:14,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}   )
20::	⊢ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}
21:19,20:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝑉   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵   )
qed:21:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)

Theorem

csbfv12gALTVD 44919

Virtual deduction proof of csbfv12 6954. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbfv12 6954 is csbfv12gALTVD 44919 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbfv12gALTVD 44919.

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} = { 𝑦}   )
3:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵})   )
4:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = { ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}   )
5:4:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})   )
6:3,5:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})   )
7:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦})   )
8:6,2:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ { 𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})    )
10:9:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})   )
11:10:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
12:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
13:11,12:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦 }}   )
14:13:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
15:1:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
16:14,15:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ ( 𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
17::	⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
18:17:	⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵 }) = {𝑦}}
19:1,18:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
20:16,19:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}   )
21::	⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
22:20,21:	⊢ (   𝐴 ∈ 𝐶   ▶   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)   )
qed:22:	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))

Theorem

con5VD 44920

Virtual deduction proof of con5 44542. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con5 44542 is con5VD 44920 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con5VD 44920.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
4::	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
5:3,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
qed:5:	⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Theorem

relopabVD 44921

Virtual deduction proof of relopab 5834. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. relopab 5834 is relopabVD 44921 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from relopabVD 44921.

1::	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
2:1:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑣 ⟩   )
3::	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑣⟩ = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩   )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝑣   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,    𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))   )
8:7:	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
9:8:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
90::	⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
91:90:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣)
92::	⊢ ∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦
10:91,92:	⊢ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣
11:9,10:	⊢ ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
12:11:	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
13::	⊢ (∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
14:12,13:	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
15:14:	⊢ (∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
150::	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑢)
151:150:	⊢ (∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢)
152::	⊢ ∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥
16:151,152:	⊢ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢
17:15,16:	⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
18:17:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨ 𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
19:18:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑦∃𝑢 ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
20::	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
21:19,20:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
22:21:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑥 ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
23::	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
24:22,23:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢 ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
25:24:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
26::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
27::	⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
28:26,27:	⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)
29:28:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦 ⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
30:29:	⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
31:30:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
32:31:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩} = { 𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))}
320:25,32:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
33::	⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
34::	⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
35:33,34:	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)
36:35:	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣 ⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
37:36:	⊢ (∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
38:37:	⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢 ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
39:38:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩} = { 𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
40:320,39:	⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
41::	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)) }
42::	⊢ {⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V )} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)) }
43:40,41,42:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} ⊆ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)}
44::	⊢ {⟨𝑢   ,   𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V )} = (V × V)
45:43,44:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V )} ⊆ (V × V)
46:28:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
47:46:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)}
48:45,47:	⊢ {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
qed:48:	⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥   ,   𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Theorem

19.41rgVD 44922

Virtual deduction proof of 19.41rg 44570. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 19.41rg 44570 is 19.41rgVD 44922 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 19.41rgVD 44922. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
2:1:	⊢ ((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
3:2:	⊢ ∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
4:3:	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
5::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
7::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    ∀𝑥𝜓   )
8:6,7:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
9:8:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ,   ∀𝑥𝜓   ▶    (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∀𝑥𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
11:5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥𝜓)   )
12:10,11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (𝜓 → ( ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   (∃𝑥𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
14:13:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   ▶   ((∃𝑥 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
qed:14:	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

2pm13.193VD 44923

Virtual deduction proof of 2pm13.193 44572. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 2pm13.193 44572 is 2pm13.193VD 44923 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2pm13.193VD 44923. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:1:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
7:6:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
8:2:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
9:7,8:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   𝜑   )
12:2,11:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
13:12:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
14::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:15:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
17:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜑    )
18:16,17:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
20:15:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
21:19:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
22:20,21:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
23:22:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ([ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢)   )
24:23:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
25:15,24:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
26:25:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
qed:13,26:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))

⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))

Theorem

hbimpgVD 44924

Virtual deduction proof of hbimpg 44574. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbimpg 44574 is hbimpgVD 44924 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbimpgVD 44924. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   )
2:1:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3::	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ 𝜑   )
4:2:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
5:4:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
6:3,5:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑   )
7::	⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
8:7:	⊢ (∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
9:6,8:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
11::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
12:11:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
13:1:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)   )
15:14,12:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
16:10,15:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
17::	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
18:16,17:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
19::	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥( 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
20::	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥( 𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
21:19,20:	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
22:21,18:	⊢ (   (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))   ▶   ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))   )
qed:22:	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Theorem

hbalgVD 44925

Virtual deduction proof of hbalg 44575. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbalg 44575 is hbalgVD 44925 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbalgVD 44925. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3::	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)
4:2,3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)   )
5::	⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦∀𝑦( 𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
6:5,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦(∀ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)   )
qed:6:	⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))

⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

hbexgVD 44926

Virtual deduction proof of hbexg 44576. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbexg 44576 is hbexgVD 44926 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from hbexgVD 44926. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
2:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
5::	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
6::	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦 ∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
7:5:	⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
8:5,6,7:	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
9:8,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
10:9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
11:10:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∀ 𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
14::	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥 ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
15:13,14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
16:15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 (¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
18::	⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
19:17,18:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∃ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)   )
20:18:	⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
21:19,20:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   (∃ 𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
22:8,21:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑦 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
23:14,22:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
qed:23:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)   ▶   ∀𝑥 ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )

⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

ax6e2eqVD 44927*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 44577 is ax6e2eqVD 44927 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2eqVD 44927. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
2::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
3:1:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
4:2,3:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑢   )
5:2,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ,   𝑥 = 𝑢   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
6:5:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
7:6:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
8:7:	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
9::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
10:8,9:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
11:1,10:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑥 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))   )
13::	⊢ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
14:13,12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢 )   )
140:14:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) )
141:140:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢))
15:1,141:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
16:1,15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
19::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 = 𝑣   )
20::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑢    )
22:19,21:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣    )
23:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢    )
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
25:24:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
26:25:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
28:27:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
29:28:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
30:29:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢 ) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
31:18,30:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
qed:31:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))

Theorem

ax6e2ndVD 44928*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2nd 44578 is ax6e2ndVD 44928 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndVD 44928. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣
2::	⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
3:1,2:	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣)
4:3:	⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
5::	⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢)
6:5:	⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
7:6:	⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑦 (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
8:4,7:	⊢ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
9::	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑧 = 𝑣)
10::	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑧𝑦 = 𝑣)
11::	⊢ (   𝑧 = 𝑦   ▶   𝑧 = 𝑦   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝑧 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
120:11:	⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
13:9,10,120:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
14::	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15:14,13:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:15:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
17:16:	⊢ (∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
18::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
19:17,18:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀ 𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
20:14,19:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
22:21:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
23:22:	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
24::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
25:23,24:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
26:14,25:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
27:26:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))   )
28:8,27:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
29:28:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
qed:29:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

ax6e2ndeqVD 44929*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 44577 is ax6e2ndeqVD 44929 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndeqVD 44929. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   )
2::	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   ( 𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑢   )
4:1,3:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 ≠ 𝑣   )
5:2:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑦 = 𝑣   )
6:4,5:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶   𝑥 ≠ 𝑦   )
7::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
8:7:	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
9::	⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
10:8,9:	⊢ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
11:6,10:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   ▶    ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
12:11:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
14:13:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
15::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
19:15:	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
20:14,19:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
21:20:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
22:21:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
23::	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃ 𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
24:22,23:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
25::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
26:25:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
260::	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
27:260:	⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
270:26,27:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
28::	⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
29:270,28:	⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
30:24,29:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)   )
31:30:	⊢ (   𝑢 ≠ 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))   )
32:31:	⊢ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
33::	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   𝑢 = 𝑣   )
34:33:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)   )
35:34:	⊢ (   𝑢 = 𝑣   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))   )
36:35:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
37::	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)
38:32,36,37:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
39::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
40::	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
41:40:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃ 𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
42::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
43:39,41,42:	⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 ))
44:40,43:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
qed:38,44:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

2sb5ndVD 44930*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2sb5nd 44580 is 2sb5ndVD 44930 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2sb5ndVD 44930. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
2:1:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
3::	⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
4:3:	⊢ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑢 / 𝑥] ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
6::	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
7::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
8:7:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
9:6,8:	⊢ (   ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   )
10:9:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
11:5,10:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
12:11:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
13::	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
14::	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   (∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][ 𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
16:13,15:	⊢ (   ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦 ]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)   )
17:16:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦] 𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
19:12,17:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
20:19:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
21:2,20:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
22:21:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
23:13:	⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
24:22,23:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
240:24:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
241::	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
242:241,240:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
243::	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ( [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) ↔ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))))
25:242,243:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ([ 𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
26::	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
qed:25,26:	⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

2uasbanhVD 44931*

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2uasbanh 44581 is 2uasbanhVD 44931 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2uasbanhVD 44931. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-May-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

h1::	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
100:1:	⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
2:100:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))   )
3:2:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )   )
5:4:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)    )
6:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))   )
7:3,6:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑   )
8:2:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)   )
9:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
102:101:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
103::	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦 ]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
104:102,103:	⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
11:7,10,104:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   )
110:5:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))   )
12:11,110:	⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
120:12:	⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣 ) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
13:1,120:	⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
14::	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))   )
15:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)   )
16:14:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   𝜑   )
18:15,17:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)   )
19:18:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 )) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
20:19:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
21:20:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
22:16:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   𝜓   )
23:15,22:	⊢ (   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ))   ▶   ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)   )
24:23:	⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 )) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
25:24:	⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
26:25:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
27:21,26:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦( (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
qed:13,27:	⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦( (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))

⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

e2ebindVD 44932

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the Metamath Proof Assistant. e2ebind 44583 is e2ebindVD 44932 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from e2ebindVD 44932.

1::	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
2:1:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
3:2:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑 ))
4::	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   )
5:3,4:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝜑)   )
6::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
7:5,6:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑)   )
9::	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)   )
11::	⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑦𝜑)
12:11:	⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)
13:10,12:	⊢ (   ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥   ▶   (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)   )
14:13:	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦𝜑))
15::	⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
qed:14,15:	⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑦𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))

21.41.8  Virtual Deduction transcriptions of textbook proofs

Theorem

sb5ALTVD 44933*

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20 Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2276, found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sb5ALT 44545 is sb5ALTVD 44933 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 44933.

1::	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2::	⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3:1,2:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   )
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
6::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
7::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝜑   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11:101,10:	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
12:5,11:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
qed:12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Theorem

vk15.4jVD 44934

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 15 Excercise 4.f. found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 442 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. vk15.4j 44548 is vk15.4jVD 44934 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from vk15.4jVD 44934. Step numbers greater than 25 are additional steps necessary for the sequent calculus proof not contained in the Fitch-style proof. Otherwise, step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

h1::	⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
h2::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ))
h3::	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
4::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   )
5:4:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∀𝑥𝜃   )
6:3:	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
7::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜏   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ 𝜑   )
10:5:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   𝜃   )
11:10,8:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
12:11:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
13:12:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)   )
14:2,13:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒   )
140::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 )
141:140:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
142::	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜒)
143:142:	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
144:6,14,141,143:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒    )
15:1:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
16:9:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑   )
161::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
162:6,16,141,161:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑    )
17:162:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑   )
18:15,17:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∃𝑥( 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)   )
19:18:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)   )
20:144:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜒    )
21::	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ¬ 𝜒   )
22:19:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   (𝜓 → 𝜒 )   )
23:21,22:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ¬ 𝜓   )
24:23:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ,   ¬ 𝜒   ▶   ∃ 𝑥¬ 𝜓   )
240::	⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 )
241:20,24,141,240:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ∃𝑥¬ 𝜓    )
25:241:	⊢ (   ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃   ▶   ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓    )
qed:25:	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

Theorem

notnotrALTVD 44935

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 130). The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 44549 is notnotrALTVD 44935 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from notnotrALTVD 44935. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3:1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4::	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5:3:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6:5,1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
qed:6:	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Theorem

con3ALTVD 44936

The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 (which is con3 153). The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 44550 is con3ALTVD 44936 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con3ALTVD 44936. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
3::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
4:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
5:1,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
6::	⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7:6,5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜓   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
9::	⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
10:8:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)   )
qed:10:	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

21.41.9  Theorems proved using conjunction-form Virtual Deduction

Theorem

elpwgdedVD 44937

Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. Derived from elpwg 4603. In form of VD deduction with 𝜑 and 𝜓 as variable virtual hypothesis collections based on Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. elpwgded 44584 is elpwgdedVD 44937 using conventional notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝐴 ∈ V   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   )   ▶   𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵   )

Theorem

sspwimp 44938

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. For the biconditional, see sspwb 5454. The proof sspwimp 44938, using conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form, sspwimpVD 44939, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpVD 44939

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimp 44938 is sspwimpVD 44939 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpVD 44939. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (   .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpcf 44940

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpcf 44940, using conventional notation, was translated from its virtual deduction form, sspwimpcfVD 44941, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

sspwimpcfVD 44941

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sspwimpcf 44940 is sspwimpcfVD 44941 without virtual deductions and was derived from sspwimpcfVD 44941. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   )
2::	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴    ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴   )
4:3,1:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵   )
5::	⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6:4,5:	⊢ (   (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ,   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵    )
7:6:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)    )
8:7:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)   )
9:8:	⊢ (   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵   ▶   𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵   )
qed:9:	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

suctrALTcf 44942

The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALTcf 44942, using conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form, suctrALTcfVD 44943, using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Theorem

suctrALTcfVD 44943

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44589) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 44942 is suctrALTcfVD 44943 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 44943. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

21.41.10  Theorems with a VD proof in conventional notation derived from a VD proof

Theorem

suctrALT3 44944

The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 44944 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html 44944. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 44589 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used jaoded 44586). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 5261) . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Theorem

sspwimpALT 44945

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. sspwimpALT 44945 is the completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html 44945. It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from the VD proof exists. See wvd1 44589 for a description of Virtual Deduction. Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used elpwgded 44584). Unification deductions employ Mario Carneiro's metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5 used elpwi 4607). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

unisnALT 44946

A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53. The User manually input on a mmj2 Proof Worksheet, without labels, all steps of unisnALT 44946 except 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30. With execution of the mmj2 unification command, mmj2 could find labels for all steps except for 2, 12, 16, 22, and 31 (and the then non-existing steps 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30). mmj2 could not find reference theorems for those five steps because the hypothesis field of each of these steps was empty and none of those steps unifies with a theorem in set.mm. Each of these five steps is a semantic variation of a theorem in set.mm and is 2-step provable. mmj2 does not have the ability to automatically generate the semantic variation in set.mm of a theorem in a mmj2 Proof Worksheet unless the theorem in the Proof Worksheet is labeled with a 1-hypothesis deduction whose hypothesis is a theorem in set.mm which unifies with the theorem in the Proof Worksheet. The stepprover.c program, which invokes mmj2, has this capability. stepprover.c automatically generated steps 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30, labeled all steps, and generated the RPN proof of unisnALT 44946. Roughly speaking, stepprover.c added to the Proof Worksheet a labeled duplicate step of each non-unifying theorem for each label in a text file, labels.txt, containing a list of labels provided by the User. Upon mmj2 unification, stepprover.c identified a label for each of the five theorems which 2-step proves it. For unisnALT 44946, the label list is a list of all 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deductions in set.mm. stepproverp.c is the same as stepprover.c except that it intermittently pauses during execution, allowing the User to observe the changes to a text file caused by the execution of particular statements of the program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ {𝐴} = 𝐴

21.41.11  Theorems with a proof in conventional notation derived from a VD proof

Theorems with a proof in conventional notation automatically derived by completeusersproof.c from a Virtual Deduction User's Proof.

Theorem

notnotrALT2 44947

Converse of double negation. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 102. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Theorem

sspwimpALT2 44948

If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)

Theorem

e2ebindALT 44949

Absorption of an existential quantifier of a double existential quantifier of non-distinct variables. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in e2ebindVD 44932. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑))

Theorem

ax6e2ndALT 44950*

If at least two sets exist (dtru 5441), then the same is true expressed in an alternate form similar to the form of ax6e 2388. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in ax6e2ndVD 44928. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

ax6e2ndeqALT 44951*

"At least two sets exist" expressed in the form of dtru 5441 is logically equivalent to the same expressed in a form similar to ax6e 2388 if dtru 5441 is false implies 𝑢 = 𝑣. Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in ax6e2ndeqVD 44929. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))

Theorem

2sb5ndALT 44952*

Equivalence for double substitution 2sb5 2278 without distinct 𝑥, 𝑦 requirement. 2sb5nd 44580 is derived from 2sb5ndVD 44930. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html format is displayed in 2sb5ndVD 44930. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

chordthmALT 44953*

The intersecting chords theorem. If points A, B, C, and D lie on a circle (with center Q, say), and the point P is on the interior of the segments AB and CD, then the two products of lengths PA · PB and PC · PD are equal. The Euclidean plane is identified with the complex plane, and the fact that P is on AB and on CD is expressed by the hypothesis that the angles APB and CPD are equal to π. The result is proven by using chordthmlem5 26879 twice to show that PA · PB and PC · PD both equal BQ ² − PQ ² . This is similar to the proof of the theorem given in Euclid's Elements, where it is Proposition III.35. Proven by David Moews on 28-Feb-2017 as chordthm 26880. https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/chordthmaltvd.html 26880 is a Virtual Deduction User's Proof transcription of chordthm 26880. That VD User's Proof was input into completeusersproof, automatically generating this chordthmALT 44953 Metamath proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Sep-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ (ℑ‘(log‘(𝑦 / 𝑥))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐵 − 𝑃)) = π)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 − 𝑃)𝐹(𝐷 − 𝑃)) = π)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝑄)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) = (abs‘(𝐷 − 𝑄)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐴)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐵))) = ((abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐶)) · (abs‘(𝑃 − 𝐷))))

Theorem

isosctrlem1ALT 44954

Lemma for isosctr 26864. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html 26864. As it is verified by the Metamath program, isosctrlem1ALT 44954 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/isosctrlem1altvd.html 44954. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ ¬ 1 = 𝐴) → (ℑ‘(log‘(1 − 𝐴))) ≠ π)

Theorem

iunconnlem2 44955*

The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnlem2 44955 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconlem2vd.html 44955. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑣 ∩ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) ∧ ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊆ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾_t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾_t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn)

Theorem

iunconnALT 44956*

The indexed union of connected overlapping subspaces sharing a common point is connected. This proof was automatically derived by completeusersproof from its Virtual Deduction proof counterpart https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html. As it is verified by the Metamath program, iunconnALT 44956 verifies https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/iunconaltvd.html 44956. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐽 ↾_t 𝐵) ∈ Conn)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ↾_t ∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ∈ Conn)

Theorem

sineq0ALT 44957

A complex number whose sine is zero is an integer multiple of π. The Virtual Deduction form of the proof is https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altvd.html. The Metamath form of the proof is sineq0ALT 44957. The Virtual Deduction proof is based on Mario Carneiro's revision of Norm Megill's proof of sineq0 26566. The Virtual Deduction proof is verified by automatically transforming it into the Metamath form of the proof using completeusersproof, which is verified by the Metamath program. The proof of https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sineq0altro.html 26566 is a form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction proof's step numbers and their ordering. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ((sin‘𝐴) = 0 ↔ (𝐴 / π) ∈ ℤ))

21.42  Mathbox for Eric Schmidt

21.42.1  Miscellany

Theorem

rspesbcd 44958*

Restricted quantifier version of spesbcd 3883. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Theorem

rext0 44959*

Nonempty existential quantification of a theorem is true. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)

21.42.2  Study of dfbi1ALT

Theorem

dfbi1ALTa 44960

Version of dfbi1ALT 214 using ⊤ for step 2 and shortened using a1i 11, a2i 14, and con4i 114. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

Theorem

simprimi 44961

Inference associated with simprim 166. Proved exactly as step 11 is obtained from step 4 in dfbi1ALTa 44960. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓

Theorem

dfbi1ALTb 44962

Further shorten dfbi1ALTa 44960 using simprimi 44961. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 22-Oct-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))

21.42.3  Relation-preserving functions

Syntax

wrelp 44963

Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation-preserving property. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

wff 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)

Definition

df-relp 44964*

Define the relation-preserving predicate. This is a viable notion of "homomorphism" corresponding to df-isom 6570. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))

Theorem

relpeq1 44965

Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐻 = 𝐺 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)))

Theorem

relpeq2 44966

Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑇, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)))

Theorem

relpeq3 44967

Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑇(𝐴, 𝐵)))

Theorem

relpeq4 44968

Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐶, 𝐵)))

Theorem

relpeq5 44969

Equality theorem for relation-preserving functions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐶)))

Theorem

nfrelp 44970

Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a relation-preserving function. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑆    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵)

Theorem

relpf 44971

A relation-preserving function is a function. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝐵)

Theorem

relprel 44972

A relation-preserving function preserves the relation. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷 → (𝐻‘𝐶)𝑆(𝐻‘𝐷)))

Theorem

relpmin 44973

A preimage of a minimal element under a relation-preserving function is minimal. Essentially one half of isomin 7357. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝐻 “ 𝐶) ∩ (^◡𝑆 “ {(𝐻‘𝐷)})) = ∅ → (𝐶 ∩ (^◡𝑅 “ {𝐷})) = ∅))

Theorem

relpfrlem 44974*

Lemma for relpfr 44975. Proved without using the Axiom of Replacement. This is isofrlem 7360 with weaker hypotheses. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 “ 𝑥) ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Theorem

relpfr 44975

If the image of a set under a relation-preserving function is well-founded, so is the set. See isofr 7362 for a bidirectional statement. A more general version of Lemma I.9.9 of [Kunen2] p. 47. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝐻 RelPres 𝑅, 𝑆(𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑆 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

21.42.4  Well-founded sets

Theorem

trwf 44976

The class of well-founded sets is transitive. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 9-Sep-2025.)

⊢ Tr ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On)

Theorem

rankrelp 44977

The rank function preserves ∈. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ rank RelPres E , E (∪ (𝑅₁ “ On), On)

Theorem

wffr 44978

The class of well-founded sets is well-founded. Lemma I.9.24(2) of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Oct-2025.)

⊢ E Fr ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On)

Theorem

trfr 44979

A transitive class well-founded by ∈ is a subclass of the class of well-founded sets. Part of Lemma I.9.21 of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Fr 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On))

Theorem

tcfr 44980

A set is well-founded if and only if its transitive closure is well-founded by ∈. This characterization of well-founded sets is that in Definition I.9.20 of [Kunen2] p. 53. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-Oct-2025.)

⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) ↔ E Fr (TC‘𝐴))

Theorem

xpwf 44981

The Cartesian product of two well-founded sets is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On)) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On))

Theorem

dmwf 44982

The domain of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) → dom 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On))

Theorem

rnwf 44983

The range of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 12-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) → ran 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On))

Theorem

relwf 44984

A relation is a well-founded set iff its domain and range are. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) ↔ (dom 𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On) ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ ∪ (𝑅₁ “ On))))

21.42.5  Absoluteness in transitive models

Theorem

ralabso 44985*

Simplification of restricted quantification in a transitive class. When 𝜑 is quantifier-free, this shows that the formula ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦𝜑 is absolute for transitive models, which is a particular case of Lemma I.16.2 of [Kunen2] p. 95. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)))

Theorem

rexabso 44986*

Simplification of restricted quantification in a transitive class. When 𝜑 is quantifier-free, this shows that the formula ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦𝜑 is absolute for transitive models, which is a particular case of Lemma I.16.2 of [Kunen2] p. 95. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

ralabsod 44987*

Deduction form of ralabso 44985. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)))

Theorem

rexabsod 44988*

Deduction form of rexabso 44986. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

ralabsobidv 44989*

Formula-building lemma for proving absoluteness results. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

rexabsobidv 44990*

Formula-building lemma for proving absoluteness results. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (𝜑 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))

Theorem

ssabso 44991*

The notion "𝑥 is a subset of 𝑦 " is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))

Theorem

disjabso 44992*

Disjointness is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))

Theorem

n0abso 44993*

Nonemptiness is absolute for transitive models. Compare Example I.16.3 of [Kunen2] p. 96 and the following discussion. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀) → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

21.42.6  Lemmas for showing axioms hold in models

Theorem

traxext 44994*

A transitive class models the Axiom of Extensionality ax-ext 2708. Lemma II.2.4(1) of [Kunen2] p. 111. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (Tr 𝑀 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Theorem

modelaxreplem1 44995*

Lemma for modelaxrep 44998. We show that 𝑀 is closed under taking subsets. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑀)

Theorem

modelaxreplem2 44996*

Lemma for modelaxrep 44998. We define a class 𝐹 and show that the antecedent of Replacement implies that 𝐹 is a function. We use Replacement (in the form of funex 7239) to show that 𝐹 exists. Then we show that, under our hypotheses, the range of 𝐹 is a member of 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑀)

Theorem

modelaxreplem3 44997*

Lemma for modelaxrep 44998. We show that the consequent of Replacement is satisfied with ran 𝐹 as the value of 𝑦. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐹    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Theorem

modelaxrep 44998*

Conditions which guarantee that a class models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5279. Similar to Lemma II.2.4(6) of [Kunen2] p. 111. The first two hypotheses are those in Kunen. The reason for the third hypothesis that our version of Replacement is different from Kunen's (which is zfrep6 7979). If we assumed Regularity, we could eliminate this extra hypothesis, since under Regularity, the empty set is a member of every non-empty transitive class.

Note that, to obtain the relativization of an instance of Replacement to 𝑀, the formula ∀𝑦𝜑 would need to be replaced with ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀𝜒, where 𝜒 is 𝜑 with all quantifiers relativized to 𝑀. However, we can obtain this by using 𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝜒 for 𝜑 in this theorem, so it does establish that all instances of Replacement hold in 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (𝜓 → Tr 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑀) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))

Theorem

ssclaxsep 44999*

A class that is closed under subsets models the Axiom of Separation ax-sep 5296. Lemma II.2.4(3) of [Kunen2] p. 111.

Note that, to obtain the relativization of an instance of Separation to 𝑀, the formula 𝜑 would need to be replaced with its relativization to 𝑀. However, this new formula is a valid substitution for 𝜑, so this theorem does establish that all instances of Separation hold in 𝑀. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑀 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

0elaxnul 45000*

A class that contains the empty set models the Null Set Axiom ax-nul 5306. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 19-Oct-2025.)

⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝑀 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)