Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44901-45000 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|
| Statement |
|---|
| |
| Theorem | uun132 44901 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun132p1 44902 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | anabss7p1 44903 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
This would have been named uun221 if the zeroth permutation did not
exist in set.mm as anabss7 673. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | un10 44904 |
A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , ⊤ ) ▶ 𝜓 )
⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) |
| |
| Theorem | un01 44905 |
A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜑 ) ▶ 𝜓 )
⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) |
| |
| Theorem | un2122 44906 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2131 44907 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2131p1 44908 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1 44909 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1p1 44910 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunTT1p2 44911 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ ⊤)
→ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11 44912 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11p1 44913 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT11p2 44914 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12 44915 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p1 44916 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((⊤
∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p2 44917 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p3 44918 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p4 44919 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uunT12p5 44920 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun111 44921 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | 3anidm12p1 44922 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
3anidm12 1421 denotes the deduction which would have been
named uun112 if
it did not pre-exist in set.mm. This second permutation's name is based
on this pre-existing name. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | 3anidm12p2 44923 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123 44924 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p1 44925 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p2 44926 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p3 44927 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun123p4 44928 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221 44929 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Dec-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221p1 44930 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | uun2221p2 44931 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impdirp1 44932 |
A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses.
Commuted version of 3impdir 1352. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
4-Feb-2017.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impcombi 44933 |
A 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deduction. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Sep-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| |
| 21.41.6 Theorems proved using Virtual
Deduction
|
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT 44934 |
Virtual deduction proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 5206. A
transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof corresponds
to the virtual deduction proof of dftr4 5206 without accumulating results.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT2 44935 |
Virtual deduction proof of trsspwALT 44934. This proof is the same as the
proof of trsspwALT 44934 except each virtual deduction symbol is
replaced by
its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A transitive class is a
subset of its power class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trsspwALT3 44936 |
Short predicate calculus proof of the left-to-right implication of
dftr4 5206. A transitive class is a subset of its power
class. This
proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the
proof of trsspwALT2 44935, which is the virtual deduction proof trsspwALT 44934
without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtr 44937 |
Virtual deduction proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 5206. A
class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof
corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 44937 without
accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtrALT 44938 |
Virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 44937. This proof is the same as the
proof of sspwtr 44937 except each virtual deduction symbol is
replaced by
its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A class which is a
subclass of its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwtrALT2 44939 |
Short predicate calculus proof of the right-to-left implication of
dftr4 5206. A class which is a subclass of its power
class is transitive.
This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to
the proof of sspwtrALT 44938, which is the virtual deduction proof sspwtr 44937
without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | pwtrVD 44940 |
Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5395; see pwtrrVD 44941 for the converse.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | pwtrrVD 44941 |
Virtual deduction proof of pwtr 5395; see pwtrVD 44940 for the converse.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (Tr 𝒫 𝐴 → Tr 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT 44942 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrvd.html
is a
Virtual Deduction proof verified by automatically transforming it into
the Metamath proof of suctrALT 44942 using completeusersproof, which is
verified by the Metamath program. The proof of
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctrro.html 44942 is a
form of the completed proof which preserves the Virtual Deduction
proof's step numbers and their ordering. See suctr 6399 for the original
proof. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare,
12-Jun-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALTVD 44943 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 44944. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssiALT 44944 |
If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a
subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 4759. This
theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 44943 using a
translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snsslVD 44945 |
Virtual deduction proof of snssl 44946. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snssl 44946 |
If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's
element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the
right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 4736.
The proof of
this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 44945 using a tools
command file, translateMWO.cmd, by translating the proof into its
non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snelpwrVD 44947 |
Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 5387. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unipwrVD 44948 |
Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 44949. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | unipwr 44949 |
A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is
the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 5393. The proof of this theorem
was automatically generated from unipwrVD 44948 using a tools command file ,
translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual
deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2VD 44950 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 44951. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2 44951 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3939, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem
6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was
automatically generated from
sstrALT2VD 44950 using the command file
translate_without_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the
automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof
which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly
contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof
contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the
minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2VD 44952 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 44953. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2 44953 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctr 6399. The successor of a transitive
class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the
virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 44952 using the tools command file
translate_without_overwriting_minimize_excluding_duplicates.cmd .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elex2VD 44954* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2810. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elex22VD 44955* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex22 3462. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqsbc2VD 44956* |
Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc2 3801. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | zfregs2VD 44957* |
Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 9630. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | tpid3gVD 44958 |
Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 4724. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem1VD 44959* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 9509. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem2VD 44960* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 9510. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lpVD 44961 |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 9511. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| 21.41.7 Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction
with mmj2 assistance
|
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2VD 44962 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 500. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
| | qed:3,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))
|
The proof of simplbi2 500 was automatically derived from it.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | 3ornot23VD 44963 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 44626. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑
∧ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 5:3,4,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:2,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:5,6,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi1rVD 44964 |
Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 44627. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 8:7,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 9:1,8,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)) )
| | 12:6,11,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | bitr3VD 44965 |
Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 352. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑
↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜓
↔ 𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 4:3,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜑
↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
→ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3orbi123VD 44966 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 44628. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧
(𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 5:2,3,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:5,4,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 7:?: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))
| | 8:6,7,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) ↔
(𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒
↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨
𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃
∨ 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbc3orgVD 44967 |
Virtual deduction proof of the analogue of sbcor 3788 with three disjuncts.
The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 32:3: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)
↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 33:1,32,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1,33,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:5,7,?: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 19.21a3con13vVD 44968* |
Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 44650. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑
∧ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:2,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:2,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 6:1,4,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜑 )
| | 7:3,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:5,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 9:7,6,8,?: e222 44753 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 11:10:in2 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:11:in1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbirVD 44969 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbir 44596. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:1,2,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e32 44874 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbiriVD 44970 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 810. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:2,1,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e21 44846 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 7:4,6,?: e32 44874 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | rspsbc2VD 44971* |
Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 44651. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 4:1,3,?: e13 44864 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4,?: e13 44864 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 6:2,5,?: e23 44871 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpVD 44972 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1359. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 5:4,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 8:7,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 10:2,9,?: e01 44808 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
| | qed:6,11,?: e00 44884 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomVD 44973 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 44597. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜏
↔ 𝜃))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 8:7,2,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)))
| | qed:5,9,?: e00 44884 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomiVD 44974 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 44598. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcoreleleqVD 44975* |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 44652. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈
𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 =
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) )
| | 5:2,3,4,?: e111 44791 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 7:5,6: e11 44805 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbra2VD 44976* |
Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 3343. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 3:1,2,?: e00 44884 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 5:4,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | qed:3,5,?: e00 44884 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | tratrbVD 44977* |
Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 44653. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 7:5,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 8:2,7,4,?: e121 44773 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:2,6,8,?: e122 44770 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 11:6,7,10,?: e223 44752 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 14:12,13,?: e20 44843 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 16:7,15,?: e23 44871 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 17:6,16,?: e23 44871 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 20:18,19,?: e20 44843 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 21:3,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21,9,4,?: e121 44773 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝑥 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:22,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 24:4,23,?: e12 44840 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) )
| | 25:14,20,24,?: e222 44753 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 27:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨
𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 28:27,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
→ ∀𝑦(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 29:28,26: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 30:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 31:30,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥(Tr 𝐴
∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 32:31,29: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 33:32,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | qed:33: | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | al2imVD 44978 |
Virtual deduction proof of al2im 1815. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜒))
| | 4:2,3,?: e10 44811 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
→ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | syl5impVD 44979 |
Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 44629. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44744 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓
→ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜓) )
| | 4:3,2,?: e21 44846 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 44748 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | idiVD 44980 |
Virtual deduction proof of idiALT 44595. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝜑
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ 𝜑
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 |
| |
| Theorem | ancomstVD 44981 |
Closed form of ancoms 458. The following user's proof is completed by
invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all
remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44888 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))
|
The proof of ancomst 464 is derived automatically from it.
(Contributed by
Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssralv2VD 44982* |
Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3999
for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 44648 is ssralv2VD 44982 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 44982.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 4:3,2: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
| | 14:12,13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | qed:16: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ordelordALTVD 44983 |
An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 6333 using
the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 9517. dford2 is a
weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it
need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the
Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 44654 is ordelordALTVD 44983
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
ordelordALTVD 44983 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program "MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (Ord 𝐴
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐴 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 6:4,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 7:6,6,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 15:14,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 16:4,15,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | 17:16,7: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐵 )
| | qed:17: | ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomVD 44984 |
If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union
of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 4108 is equncomVD 44984 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 44984.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomiVD 44985 |
Inference form of equncom 4108. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4109 is equncomiVD 44985 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 44985.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
| | qed:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALTVD 44986 |
A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 6395.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof
completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 44987 is sucidALTVD 44986
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
sucidALTVD 44986. This proof illustrates that
completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any
User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step
is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification
theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm.
completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a
conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each
step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction.
The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or
deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and
deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in
set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction
of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem
or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has
not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or
deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction,
then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or
deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a
semantic variation of the definition (axiom)
suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 6317, a
reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or
deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another
theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection
that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter
theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴
infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a
semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with
the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 9517.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALT 44987 |
A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived
from sucidALTVD 44986 using translate_without_overwriting.cmd and
minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidVD 44988 |
A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools
program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sucid 6395 is sucidVD 44988 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sucidVD 44988.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | imbi12VD 44989 |
Implication form of imbi12i 350. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 346 is imbi12VD 44989 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 44989.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜃) )
| | 9:2,8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | imbi13VD 44990 |
Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The
following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 44637
is imbi13VD 44990 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from imbi13VD 44990.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂)))) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcim2gVD 44991 |
Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication.
Similar to sbcimg 3786.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcim2g 44655 is sbcim2gVD 44991 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcim2gVD 44991.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)
↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒))) )
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcbiVD 44992 |
Implication form of sbcbii 3794.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcbi 44656 is sbcbiVD 44992 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcbiVD 44992.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | trsbcVD 44993* |
Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a
class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trsbc 44657 is trsbcVD 44993 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from trsbcVD 44993.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 5:1,2,3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 →
([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) )
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 20:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 22:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | 24:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 26:1,25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 27:23,26: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | qed:27: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | truniALTVD 44994* |
The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
truniALT 44658 is truniALTVD 44994 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from truniALTVD 44994.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 8:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:1,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:3,7,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 16:5,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥
▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∪ 𝐴 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ee33VD 44995 |
Non-virtual deduction form of e33 44850.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
ee33 44638 is ee33VD 44995 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from ee33VD 44995.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
| | h3:: | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | 6:2,5: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓
→ (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜂)))))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALTVD 44996* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual
deduction proof of trintALT 44997.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trintALT 44997 is trintALTVD 44996 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 44996.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 9:7,1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:7,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:10,3,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∩ 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALT 44997* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise
5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 44997 is an alternate proof of trint 5217.
trintALT 44997 is trintALTVD 44996 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 44996 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program
"MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | undif3VD 44998 |
The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual
deduction proof of undif3 4249.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
undif3 4249 is undif3VD 44998 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from undif3VD 44998.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥
∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 7:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧
(¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 12:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 13:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 14:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 17:9,16: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
→ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 18:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 21:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 23:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 27:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 33:22,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 34:28,32: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
→ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 36:: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 37:36,35: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 38:17,37: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐴))
| | 40:39: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 41:: | ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥
∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 42:40,41: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴))
| | 43:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
))
| | 44:43,42: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)
) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 45:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 46:45,44: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 47:4,38: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 48:46,47: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴
∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 49:48: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈
((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | qed:49: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶
∖ 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcssgVD 44999 |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4469.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcssg 4469 is sbcssgVD 44999 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcssgVD 44999.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
| | 110:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈
𝐷))
| | 12:1,110: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀
𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbingVD 45000 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbin 4391.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbin 4391 is csbingVD 45000 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbingVD 45000.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)
}
| | 20:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝐷)}
| | 30:1,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 3:1,30: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 13:5,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = {
𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
Home
Hilbert Space Explorer
Users' Mathboxes