Theorem respreima 6937

Description: The preimage of a restricted function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
respreima	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem respreima

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfn 6460	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
2		elin 3907	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹))
3	2	biancomi 462	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1i 623	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5		fvres 6787	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	5	eleq1d 2824	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	pm5.32i 574	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9	4, 8	bitri 274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
11		an32 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
13		fnfun 6529	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun 𝐹)
14	13	funresd 6473	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))
15		dmres 5910	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)
16		df-fn 6433	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)))
17	14, 15, 16	sylanblrc 589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹))
18		elpreima 6929	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
19	17, 18	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elin 3907	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21		elpreima 6929	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
22	21	anbi1d 629	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
23	20, 22	syl5bb 282	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
24	12, 19, 23	3bitr4d 310	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
25	1, 24	sylbi 216	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
26	25	eqrdv 2737	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2109   ∩ cin 3890  ^◡ccnv 5587  dom cdm 5588   ↾ cres 5590   “ cima 5591  Fun wfun 6424   Fn wfn 6425  ‘cfv 6430

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2710  ax-sep 5226  ax-nul 5233  ax-pr 5355

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1786  df-nf 1790  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2541  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2890  df-ral 3070  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3074  df-v 3432  df-dif 3894  df-un 3896  df-in 3898  df-ss 3908  df-nul 4262  df-if 4465  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-uni 4845  df-br 5079  df-opab 5141  df-id 5488  df-xp 5594  df-rel 5595  df-cnv 5596  df-co 5597  df-dm 5598  df-rn 5599  df-res 5600  df-ima 5601  df-iota 6388  df-fun 6432  df-fn 6433  df-fv 6438

This theorem is referenced by:  paste  22426  restmetu  23707  eulerpartlemt  32317  smfres  44275