Theorem respreima 7041

Description: The preimage of a restricted function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
respreima	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem respreima

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfn 6549	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
2		elin 3933	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹))
3	2	biancomi 462	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1i 624	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5		fvres 6880	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	5	eleq1d 2814	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	adantl 481	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	pm5.32i 574	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9	4, 8	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
11		an32 646	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
13		fnfun 6621	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun 𝐹)
14	13	funresd 6562	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))
15		dmres 5986	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)
16		df-fn 6517	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)))
17	14, 15, 16	sylanblrc 590	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹))
18		elpreima 7033	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
19	17, 18	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elin 3933	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21		elpreima 7033	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
22	21	anbi1d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
23	20, 22	bitrid 283	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
24	12, 19, 23	3bitr4d 311	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
25	1, 24	sylbi 217	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
26	25	eqrdv 2728	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ∩ cin 3916  ^◡ccnv 5640  dom cdm 5641   ↾ cres 5643   “ cima 5644  Fun wfun 6508   Fn wfn 6509  ‘cfv 6514

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-fv 6522

This theorem is referenced by:  paste  23188  restmetu  24465  eulerpartlemt  34369  smfres  46795