Theorem respreima 7063

Description: The preimage of a restricted function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
respreima	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem respreima

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfn 6568	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
2		elin 3922	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹))
3	2	biancomi 467	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1i 635	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5		fvres 6902	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	5	eleq1d 2848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	adantl 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	pm5.32i 584	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9	4, 8	bitri 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
11		an32 658	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 290	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
13		fnfun 6637	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun 𝐹)
14	13	funresd 6581	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))
15		dmres 6013	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)
16		df-fn 6541	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)))
17	14, 15, 16	sylanblrc 601	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹))
18		elpreima 7055	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
19	17, 18	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elin 3922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21		elpreima 7055	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
22	21	anbi1d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
23	20, 22	bitrid 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
24	12, 19, 23	3bitr4d 314	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
25	1, 24	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
26	25	eqrdv 2761	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ∩ cin 3905  ^◡ccnv 5662  dom cdm 5663   ↾ cres 5665   “ cima 5666  Fun wfun 6532   Fn wfn 6533  ‘cfv 6538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pr 5406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-fv 6546

This theorem is referenced by:  paste  23432  restmetu  24708  eulerpartlemt  34739  smfres  47484