Theorem respreima 6943

Description: The preimage of a restricted function. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
respreima	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem respreima

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfn 6464	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ 𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹)
2		elin 3903	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹))
3	2	biancomi 463	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1i 624	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
5		fvres 6793	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
6	5	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	adantl 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	pm5.32i 575	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
9	4, 8	bitri 274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
11		an32 643	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
12	10, 11	bitrdi 287	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
13		fnfun 6533	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun 𝐹)
14	13	funresd 6477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵))
15		dmres 5913	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)
16		df-fn 6436	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ↔ (Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹)))
17	14, 15, 16	sylanblrc 590	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹))
18		elpreima 6935	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Fn (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
19	17, 18	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∧ ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elin 3903	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21		elpreima 6935	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)))
22	21	anbi1d 630	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → ((𝑥 ∈ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
23	20, 22	bitrid 282	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
24	12, 19, 23	3bitr4d 311	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn dom 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
25	1, 24	sylbi 216	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝑥 ∈ (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)))
26	25	eqrdv 2736	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) “ 𝐴) = ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106   ∩ cin 3886  ^◡ccnv 5588  dom cdm 5589   ↾ cres 5591   “ cima 5592  Fun wfun 6427   Fn wfn 6428  ‘cfv 6433

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pr 5352

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-fv 6441

This theorem is referenced by:  paste  22445  restmetu  23726  eulerpartlemt  32338  smfres  44324