Theorem upgrop 29021

Description: A pseudograph represented by an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 12-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrop	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph)

Proof of Theorem upgrop

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2729	. . 3 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
2		eqid 2729	. . 3 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	1, 2	upgrf 29013	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
4		fvex 6871	. . . 4 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V
5		fvex 6871	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V
6	4, 5	pm3.2i 470	. . 3 ⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
7		opex 5424	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ V
8		eqid 2729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩)
9		eqid 2729	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩)
10	8, 9	isupgr 29011	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ V → (⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩):dom (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
11	7, 10	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩):dom (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
12		opiedgfv 28934	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = (iEdg‘𝐺))
13	12	dmeqd 5869	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → dom (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
14		opvtxfv 28931	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
15	14	pweqd 4580	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → 𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) = 𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺))
16	15	difeq1d 4088	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → (𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) ∖ {∅}) = (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
17	16	rabeqdv 3421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} = {𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2})
18	12, 13, 17	feq123d 6677	. . . 4 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → ((iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩):dom (iEdg‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2} ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
19	11, 18	bitrd 279	. . 3 ⊢ (((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V ∧ (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
20	6, 19	mp1i 13	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶{𝑝 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) ≤ 2}))
21	3, 20	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ⟨(Vtx‘𝐺), (iEdg‘𝐺)⟩ ∈ UPGraph)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2109  {crab 3405  Vcvv 3447   ∖ cdif 3911  ∅c0 4296  𝒫 cpw 4563  {csn 4589  ⟨cop 4595   class class class wbr 5107  dom cdm 5638  ⟶wf 6507  ‘cfv 6511   ≤ cle 11209  2c2 12241  ♯chash 14295  Vtxcvtx 28923  iEdgciedg 28924  UPGraphcupgr 29007

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-fv 6519  df-1st 7968  df-2nd 7969  df-vtx 28925  df-iedg 28926  df-upgr 29009

This theorem is referenced by:  finsumvtxdg2size  29478