P. 284 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28301-28400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	leslss 28301	If two surreals 𝐴 and 𝐵 share a birthday, then 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 if and only if the left set of 𝐴 is a non-strict subset of the left set of 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ (bday‘𝐴) = (bday‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (L‘𝐴) ⊆ (L‘𝐵)))
Theorem	0elold 28302	Zero is in the old set of any nonzero number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0s )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ∈ (O‘(bday‘𝐴)))
Theorem	0elleft 28303	Zero is in the left set of any positive number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ∈ (L‘𝐴))
Theorem	0elright 28304	Zero is in the right set of any negative number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 0s )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ∈ (R‘𝐴))
Theorem	madefi 28305	The made set of an ordinal natural is finite. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.) (Proof shortened by Vincent Gonzalez, 19-Aug-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (M‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	oldfi 28306	The old set of an ordinal natural is finite. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (O‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	bdayiun 28307*	The birthday of a surreal is the least upper bound of the successors of the birthdays of its options. This is the definition of the birthday of a combinatorial game in the Lean Combinatorial Game Theory library at https://github.com/vihdzp/combinatorial-games. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (bday‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (O‘(bday‘𝐴))suc (bday‘𝑥))
Theorem	bdayle 28308*	A condition for bounding a birthday above. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ Ord 𝑂) → ((bday‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑂 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (O‘(bday‘𝑋))(bday‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑂))
Theorem	sltsbday 28309	Birthday comparison rule for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s {𝐵})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵} <<s 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (bday‘𝐴) ⊆ (bday‘𝐵))
15.3.4  Cofinality and coinitiality
Theorem	cofslts 28310*	If every element of 𝐴 is bounded above by some element of 𝐵 and 𝐵 precedes 𝐶, then 𝐴 precedes 𝐶. Note - we will often use the term "cofinal" to denote that every element of 𝐴 is bounded above by some element of 𝐵. Similarly, we will use the term "coinitial" to denote that every element of 𝐴 is bounded below by some element of 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 <<s 𝐶) → 𝐴 <<s 𝐶)
Theorem	coinitslts 28311*	If 𝐵 is coinitial with 𝐶 and 𝐴 precedes 𝐶, then 𝐴 precedes 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 ≤s 𝑥 ∧ 𝐴 <<s 𝐶) → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)
Theorem	cofcut1 28312*	If 𝐶 is cofinal with 𝐴 and 𝐷 is coinitial with 𝐵 and the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 lies between 𝐶 and 𝐷, then the cut of 𝐶 and 𝐷 is equal to the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Theorem 2.6 of [Gonshor] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧) ∧ (𝐶 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐷)) → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (𝐶 |s 𝐷))
Theorem	cofcut1d 28313*	If 𝐶 is cofinal with 𝐴 and 𝐷 is coinitial with 𝐵 and the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 lies between 𝐶 and 𝐷, then the cut of 𝐶 and 𝐷 is equal to the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Theorem 2.6 of [Gonshor] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (𝐶 |s 𝐷))
Theorem	cofcut2 28314*	If 𝐴 and 𝐶 are mutually cofinal and 𝐵 and 𝐷 are mutually coinitial, then the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 is equal to the cut of 𝐶 and 𝐷. Theorem 2.7 of [Gonshor] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝒫 No) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧) ∧ (∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑡 ≤s 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐵 𝑠 ≤s 𝑟)) → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (𝐶 |s 𝐷))
Theorem	cofcut2d 28315*	If 𝐴 and 𝐶 are mutually cofinal and 𝐵 and 𝐷 are mutually coinitial, then the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 is equal to the cut of 𝐶 and 𝐷. Theorem 2.7 of [Gonshor] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝒫 No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝒫 No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐷 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑡 ≤s 𝑢)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐵 𝑠 ≤s 𝑟)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (𝐶 |s 𝐷))
Theorem	cofcutr 28316*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 is cofinal with (L‘𝑋) and 𝐵 is coinitial with (R‘𝑋). Theorem 2.9 of [Gonshor] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝑋)∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (R‘𝑋)∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧))
Theorem	cofcutr1d 28317*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 is cofinal with (L‘𝑋). First half of theorem 2.9 of [Gonshor] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝑋)∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	cofcutr2d 28318*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐵 is coinitial with (R‘𝑋). Second half of theorem 2.9 of [Gonshor] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ (R‘𝑋)∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)
Theorem	cofcutrtime 28319*	If 𝑋 is the cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵 and all of 𝐴 and 𝐵 are older than 𝑋, then (L‘𝑋) is cofinal with 𝐴 and (R‘𝑋) is coinitial with 𝐵. Note: we will call a cut where all of the elements of the cut are older than the cut itself a "timely" cut. Part of Theorem 4.02(12) of [Alling] p. 125. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (O‘(bday‘𝑋)) ∧ 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵)) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑥 ≤s 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 ≤s 𝑧))
Theorem	cofcutrtime1d 28320*	If 𝑋 is a timely cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then (L‘𝑋) is cofinal with 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (O‘(bday‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	cofcutrtime2d 28321*	If 𝑋 is a timely cut of 𝐴 and 𝐵, then (R‘𝑋) is coinitial with 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (O‘(bday‘𝑋)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑤 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 ≤s 𝑧)
Theorem	cofss 28322*	Cofinality for a subset. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤s 𝑦)
Theorem	coiniss 28323*	Coinitiality for a subset. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤s 𝑥)
Theorem	cutlt 28324*	Eliminating all elements below a given element of a cut does not affect the cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (({𝑋} ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 ∣ 𝑋 <s 𝑦}) |s 𝑅))
Theorem	cutpos 28325*	Reduce the elements of a cut for a positive number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (({ 0s } ∪ {𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝐴) ∣ 0s <s 𝑥}) |s (R‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cutmax 28326*	If 𝐴 has a maximum, then the maximum may be used alone in the cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤s 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = ({𝑋} |s 𝐵))
Theorem	cutmin 28327*	If 𝐵 has a minimum, then the minimum may be used alone in the cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <<s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ≤s 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (𝐴 |s {𝑋}))
Theorem	cutminmax 28328*	If the left set of 𝑋 has a maximum and the right set of 𝑋 has a minimum, then 𝑋 is equal to the cut of the maximum and the minimum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (L‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑥 ≤s 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (R‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑅 ≤s 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ({𝐿} |s {𝑅}))
15.4  Induction and recursion
15.4.1  Induction and recursion on one variable
Syntax	cnorec 28329	Declare the syntax for surreal recursion of one variable.
class norec (𝐹)
Definition	df-norec 28330*	Define the recursion generator for surreal functions of one variable. This generator creates a recursive function of surreals from their value on their left and right sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ norec (𝐹) = frecs({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}, No, 𝐹)
Theorem	lrrecval 28331*	The next step in the development of the surreals is to establish induction and recursion across left and right sets. To that end, we are going to develop a relationship 𝑅 that is founded, partial, and set-like across the surreals. This first theorem just establishes the value of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ ((L‘𝐵) ∪ (R‘𝐵))))
Theorem	lrrecval2 28332*	Next, we establish an alternate expression for 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (bday‘𝐴) ∈ (bday‘𝐵)))
Theorem	lrrecpo 28333*	Now, we establish that 𝑅 is a partial ordering on No. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Po No
Theorem	lrrecse 28334*	Next, we show that 𝑅 is set-like over No. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Se No
Theorem	lrrecfr 28335*	Now we show that 𝑅 is founded over No. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 Fr No
Theorem	lrrecpred 28336*	Finally, we calculate the value of the predecessor class over 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → Pred(𝑅, No, 𝐴) = ((L‘𝐴) ∪ (R‘𝐴)))
Theorem	noinds 28337*	Induction principle for a single surreal. If a property passes from a surreal's left and right sets to the surreal itself, then it holds for all surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ No → (∀𝑦 ∈ ((L‘𝑥) ∪ (R‘𝑥))𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → 𝜒)
Theorem	norecfn 28338	Surreal recursion over one variable is a function over the surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn No
Theorem	norecov 28339	Calculate the value of the surreal recursion operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐹 ↾ ((L‘𝐴) ∪ (R‘𝐴)))))
15.4.2  Induction and recursion on two variables
Syntax	cnorec2 28340	Declare the syntax for surreal recursion on two arguments.
class norec2 (𝐹)
Definition	df-norec2 28341*	Define surreal recursion on two variables. This function is key to the development of most of surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ norec2 (𝐹) = frecs({⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ∈ (No × No) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (No × No) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ ((L‘𝑑) ∪ (R‘𝑑))} (1st ‘𝑏) ∨ (1st ‘𝑎) = (1st ‘𝑏)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑎){⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝑐 ∈ ((L‘𝑑) ∪ (R‘𝑑))} (2nd ‘𝑏) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑎) = (2nd ‘𝑏)) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏))}, (No × No), 𝐹)
Theorem	noxpordpo 28342*	To get through most of the textbook definitions in surreal numbers we will need recursion on two variables. This set of theorems sets up the preconditions for double recursion. This theorem establishes the partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (No × No) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (No × No) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Po (No × No)
Theorem	noxpordfr 28343*	Next we establish the foundedness of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (No × No) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (No × No) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Fr (No × No)
Theorem	noxpordse 28344*	Next we establish the set-like nature of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (No × No) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (No × No) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 Se (No × No)
Theorem	noxpordpred 28345*	Next we calculate the predecessor class of the relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (No × No) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (No × No) ∧ (((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ (1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦)) ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝑅(2nd ‘𝑦) ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = (2nd ‘𝑦)) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → Pred(𝑆, (No × No), ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = (((((L‘𝐴) ∪ (R‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × (((L‘𝐵) ∪ (R‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	no2indlesm 28346*	Double induction on surreals with explicit notation for the relationships. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ 𝑎 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ ((L‘𝑥) ∪ (R‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((L‘𝑥) ∪ (R‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → 𝜂)
Theorem	no2inds 28347*	Double induction on surreals. The many substitution instances are to cover all possible cases. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ No ∧ 𝑦 ∈ No) → ((∀𝑧 ∈ ((L‘𝑥) ∪ (R‘𝑥))∀𝑤 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ((L‘𝑥) ∪ (R‘𝑥))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ ((L‘𝑦) ∪ (R‘𝑦))𝜃) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → 𝜂)
Theorem	norec2fn 28348	The double-recursion operator on surreals yields a function on pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (No × No)
Theorem	norec2ov 28349	The value of the double-recursion surreal function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = norec2 (𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝐺(𝐹 ↾ (((((L‘𝐴) ∪ (R‘𝐴)) ∪ {𝐴}) × (((L‘𝐵) ∪ (R‘𝐵)) ∪ {𝐵})) ∖ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))))
Theorem	no3inds 28350*	Triple induction over surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑋 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑌 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜇))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑍 → (𝜇 ↔ 𝜆))    &   ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ No ∧ 𝑐 ∈ No) → (((∀𝑑 ∈ ((L‘𝑎) ∪ (R‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ ((L‘𝑐) ∪ (R‘𝑐))𝜃 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ((L‘𝑎) ∪ (R‘𝑎))∀𝑒 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ((L‘𝑎) ∪ (R‘𝑎))∀𝑓 ∈ ((L‘𝑐) ∪ (R‘𝑐))𝜁) ∧ (∀𝑑 ∈ ((L‘𝑎) ∪ (R‘𝑎))𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))∀𝑓 ∈ ((L‘𝑐) ∪ (R‘𝑐))𝜏 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ((L‘𝑏) ∪ (R‘𝑏))𝜎) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((L‘𝑐) ∪ (R‘𝑐))𝜂) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) → 𝜆)
15.5  Surreal arithmetic
15.5.1  Addition
Syntax	cadds 28351	Declare the syntax for surreal addition.
class +s
Definition	df-adds 28352*	Define surreal addition. This is the first of the field operations on the surreals. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. Definition from [Gonshor] p. 13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s = norec2 ((𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑙𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑦 = (𝑟𝑎(2nd ‘𝑥))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘(2nd ‘𝑥))𝑧 = ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑎𝑟)}))))
Theorem	addsfn 28353	Surreal addition is a function over pairs of surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ +s Fn (No × No)
Theorem	addsval 28354*	The value of surreal addition. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑙)}) |s ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsval2 28355*	The value of surreal addition with different choices for each bound variable. Definition from [Conway] p. 5. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝐴)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝐵)𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsrid 28356	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsridd 28357	Surreal addition to zero is identity. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 0s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addscom 28358	Surreal addition is commutative. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addscomd 28359	Surreal addition is commutative. Part of Theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (𝐵 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	addslid 28360	Surreal addition to zero is identity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( 0s +s 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	addsproplem1 28361*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. To prove closure on surreal addition we need to prove that addition is compatible with order at the same time. We do this by inducting over the maximum of two natural sums of the birthdays of surreals numbers. In the final step we will loop around and use tfr3 8411 to prove this of all surreals. This first lemma just instantiates the inductive hypothesis so we do not need to do it continuously throughout the proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((bday‘𝐴) +no (bday‘𝐵)) ∪ ((bday‘𝐴) +no (bday‘𝐶))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐵 <s 𝐶 → (𝐵 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐴))))
Theorem	addsproplem2 28362*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. When proving closure for operations defined using norec and norec2, it is a strictly stronger statement to say that the cut defined is actually a cut than it is to say that the operation is closed. We will often prove this stronger statement. Here, we do so for the cut involved in surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)}))
Theorem	addsproplem3 28363*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the cut properties of surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsproplem4 28364*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑌 is older than 𝑍. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (bday‘𝑌) ∈ (bday‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem5 28365*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝑍 is older than 𝑌. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (bday‘𝑍) ∈ (bday‘𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem6 28366*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Finally, we show the second half of the induction hypothesis when 𝑌 and 𝑍 are the same age. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (bday‘𝑌) = (bday‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsproplem7 28367*	Lemma for surreal addition properties. Putting together the three previous lemmas, we now show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑦)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑥) +no (bday‘𝑧))) ∈ (((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑌)) ∪ ((bday‘𝑋) +no (bday‘𝑍))) → ((𝑥 +s 𝑦) ∈ No ∧ (𝑦 <s 𝑧 → (𝑦 +s 𝑥) <s (𝑧 +s 𝑥)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))
Theorem	addsprop 28368	Inductively show that surreal addition is closed and compatible with less-than. This proof follows from induction on the birthdays of the surreal numbers involved. This pattern occurs throughout surreal development. Theorem 3.1 of [Gonshor] p. 14. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ No ∧ 𝑌 ∈ No ∧ 𝑍 ∈ No) → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ (𝑌 <s 𝑍 → (𝑌 +s 𝑋) <s (𝑍 +s 𝑋))))
Theorem	addcutslem 28369*	Lemma for addcuts 28370. Show the statement with some additional distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addcuts 28370*	Demonstrate the cut properties of surreal addition. This gives us closure together with a pair of set-less-than relationships for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No ∧ ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} ∧ {(𝑋 +s 𝑌)} <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addcuts2 28371*	Show that the cut involved in surreal addition is legitimate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑝 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝑋)𝑝 = (𝑙 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑞 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝑌)𝑞 = (𝑋 +s 𝑚)}) <<s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝑋)𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝑌)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (R‘𝑌)𝑡 = (𝑋 +s 𝑠)}))
Theorem	addscld 28372	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +s 𝑌) ∈ No)
Theorem	addscl 28373	Surreal numbers are closed under addition. Theorem 6(iii) of [Conway[ p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ No)
Theorem	addsf 28374	Function statement for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :(No × No)⟶No
Theorem	addsfo 28375	Surreal addition is onto. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ +s :(No × No)–onto→No
Theorem	peano2no 28376	A theorem for surreals that is analogous to the second Peano postulate peano2 7902. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 +s 1s ) ∈ No)
Theorem	ltadds1im 28377	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	ltadds2im 28378	Surreal less-than is preserved under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 → (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	leadds1im 28379	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	leadds2im 28380	Surreal less-than or equal cancels under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵))
Theorem	leadds1 28381	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	leadds2 28382	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltadds2 28383	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltadds1 28384	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2 28385	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1 28386	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	leadds1d 28387	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. Theorem 5 of [Conway] p. 18. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) ≤s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	leadds2d 28388	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than or equal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) ≤s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltadds2d 28389	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +s 𝐴) <s (𝐶 +s 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltadds1d 28390	Addition to both sides of surreal less-than. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +s 𝐶) <s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addscan2d 28391	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) = (𝐵 +s 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addscan1d 28392	Cancellation law for surreal addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 +s 𝐴) = (𝐶 +s 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	addsuniflem 28393*	Lemma for addsunif 28394. State the whole theorem with extra distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑀 𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsunif 28394*	Uniformity theorem for surreal addition. This theorem states that we can use any cuts that define 𝐴 and 𝐵 in the definition of surreal addition. Theorem 3.2 of [Gonshor] p. 15. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 <<s 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐿 |s 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝑀 |s 𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) = (({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 = (𝑙 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑀 𝑧 = (𝐴 +s 𝑚)}) |s ({𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑤 = (𝑟 +s 𝐵)} ∪ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝐴 +s 𝑠)})))
Theorem	addsasslem1 28395*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand one form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝐴)𝑦 = ((𝑙 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝐵)𝑧 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑚) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (L‘𝐶)𝑤 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑛)}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ (R‘𝐴)𝑎 = ((𝑝 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶)} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ (R‘𝐵)𝑏 = ((𝐴 +s 𝑞) +s 𝐶)}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝐶)𝑐 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝑟)})))
Theorem	addsasslem2 28396*	Lemma for addition associativity. Expand the other form of the triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = ((({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑙 ∈ (L‘𝐴)𝑦 = (𝑙 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (L‘𝐵)𝑧 = (𝐴 +s (𝑚 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (L‘𝐶)𝑤 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑛))}) |s (({𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ (R‘𝐴)𝑎 = (𝑝 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶))} ∪ {𝑏 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ (R‘𝐵)𝑏 = (𝐴 +s (𝑞 +s 𝐶))}) ∪ {𝑐 ∣ ∃𝑟 ∈ (R‘𝐶)𝑐 = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝑟))})))
Theorem	addsass 28397	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ∧ 𝐶 ∈ No) → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	addsassd 28398	Surreal addition is associative. Part of theorem 3 of [Conway] p. 17. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)))
Theorem	adds32d 28399	Commutative/associative law that swaps the last two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) +s 𝐶) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐶) +s 𝐵))
Theorem	adds12d 28400	Commutative/associative law that swaps the first two terms in a triple sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Mar-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +s (𝐵 +s 𝐶)) = (𝐵 +s (𝐴 +s 𝐶)))