P. 284 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28301-28400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	zsbday 28301	A surreal integer has a finite birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-May-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω)
Theorem	zscut 28302	A cut expression for surreal integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs → 𝐴 = ({(𝐴 -s 1s )} |s {(𝐴 +s 1s )}))
15.6.5  Dyadic fractions
Syntax	c2s 28303	Declare the syntax for surreal two.
class 2s
Definition	df-2s 28304	Define surreal two. This is the simplest number greater than one. See 1p1e2s 28309 for its addition version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ 2s = ({ 1s } |s ∅)
Syntax	cexps 28305	Declare the syntax for surreal exponentiation.
class ↑s
Definition	df-exps 28306*	Define surreal exponentiation. Compare df-exp 14034. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ ↑s = (𝑥 ∈ No , 𝑦 ∈ ℤs ↦ if(𝑦 = 0s , 1s , if( 0s <s 𝑦, (seqs 1s ( ·s , (ℕs × {𝑥}))‘𝑦), ( 1s /su (seqs 1s ( ·s , (ℕs × {𝑥}))‘( -us ‘𝑦))))))
Syntax	czs12 28307	Define the syntax for the set of surreal dyadic fractions.
class ℤs[1/2]
Definition	df-zs12 28308*	Define the set of dyadic rationals. This is the set of rationals whose denominator is a power of two. Later we will prove that this is precisely the set of surreals with a finite birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ ℤs[1/2] = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤs ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0s 𝑥 = (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑧))}
Theorem	1p1e2s 28309	One plus one is two. Surreal version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-May-2025.)
⊢ ( 1s +s 1s ) = 2s
Theorem	no2times 28310	Version of 2times 12324 for surreal numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (2s ·s 𝐴) = (𝐴 +s 𝐴))
Theorem	2nns 28311	Surreal two is a surreal natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 2s ∈ ℕs
Theorem	2sno 28312	Surreal two is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 2s ∈ No
Theorem	2ne0s 28313	Surreal two is non-zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jul-2025.)
⊢ 2s ≠ 0s
Theorem	n0seo 28314*	A non-negative surreal integer is either even or odd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s 𝑁 = (2s ·s 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s 𝑁 = ((2s ·s 𝑥) +s 1s )))
Theorem	zseo 28315*	A surreal integer is either even or odd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤs → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤs 𝑁 = (2s ·s 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤs 𝑁 = ((2s ·s 𝑥) +s 1s )))
Theorem	twocut 28316	Two times the cut of zero and one is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (2s ·s ({ 0s } |s { 1s })) = 1s
Theorem	nohalf 28317	An explicit expression for one half. This theorem avoids the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Jul-2025.)
⊢ ( 1s /su 2s) = ({ 0s } |s { 1s })
Theorem	expsval 28318	The value of surreal exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jul-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤs) → (𝐴↑s𝐵) = if(𝐵 = 0s , 1s , if( 0s <s 𝐵, (seqs 1s ( ·s , (ℕs × {𝐴}))‘𝐵), ( 1s /su (seqs 1s ( ·s , (ℕs × {𝐴}))‘( -us ‘𝐵))))))
Theorem	expsnnval 28319	Value of surreal exponentiation at a natural number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Jul-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕs) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) = (seqs 1s ( ·s , (ℕs × {𝐴}))‘𝑁))
Theorem	exps0 28320	Surreal exponentiation to zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴↑s 0s ) = 1s )
Theorem	exps1 28321	Surreal exponentiation to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴↑s 1s ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	expsp1 28322	Value of a surreal number raised to a non-negative integer power plus one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s(𝑁 +s 1s )) = ((𝐴↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐴))
Theorem	expscllem 28323*	Lemma for proving non-negative surreal integer exponentiation closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ No     &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑥 ·s 𝑦) ∈ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ 1s ∈ 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	expscl 28324	Closure law for surreal exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ No )
Theorem	n0expscl 28325	Closure law for non-negative surreal integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ ℕ0s)
Theorem	nnexpscl 28326	Closure law for positive surreal integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕs ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ ℕs)
Theorem	expadds 28327	Sum of exponents law for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s(𝑀 +s 𝑁)) = ((𝐴↑s𝑀) ·s (𝐴↑s𝑁)))
Theorem	expsne0 28328	A non-negative surreal integer power is non-zero if its base is non-zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ≠ 0s )
Theorem	expsgt0 28329	A non-negative surreal integer power is positive if its base is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 0s <s 𝐴) → 0s <s (𝐴↑s𝑁))
Theorem	pw2recs 28330*	Any power of two has a multiplicative inverse. Note that this theorem does not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s → ∃𝑥 ∈ No ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝑥) = 1s )
Theorem	pw2divscld 28331	Division closure for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) ∈ No )
Theorem	pw2divsmuld 28332	Relationship between surreal division and multiplication for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 𝐵 ↔ ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐵) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2divscan3d 28333	Cancellation law for surreal division by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐴) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2divscan2d 28334	A cancellation law for surreal division by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2gt0divsd 28335	Division of a positive surreal by a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ 0s <s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2ge0divsd 28336	Divison of a non-negative surreal by a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s ≤s 𝐴 ↔ 0s ≤s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsrecd 28337	Relationship between surreal division and reciprocal for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = (𝐴 ·s ( 1s /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsdird 28338	Distribution of surreal division over addition for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) +s (𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsnegd 28339	Move negative sign inside of a power of two division. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))) = (( -us ‘𝐴) /su (2s↑s𝑁)))
Theorem	halfcut 28340	Relate the cut of twice of two numbers to the cut of the numbers. Lemma 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.) Avoid the axiom of infinity. (Proof modified by Scott Fenton, 6-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(2s ·s 𝐴)} |s {(2s ·s 𝐵)}) = (𝐴 +s 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({𝐴} |s {𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su 2s))
Theorem	addhalfcut 28341	The cut of a surreal non-negative integer and its successor is the original number plus one half. Part of theorem 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴} |s {(𝐴 +s 1s )}) = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 2s)))
Theorem	pw2cut 28342	Extend halfcut 28340 to arbitrary powers of two. Part of theorem 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(2s ·s 𝐴)} |s {(2s ·s 𝐵)}) = (𝐴 +s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))} |s {(𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))}) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s ))))
Theorem	pw2cutp1 28343	Simplify pw2cut 28342 in the case of successors of surreal integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤs)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))} |s {((𝐴 +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑁))}) = (((2s ·s 𝐴) +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s ))))
Theorem	elzs12 28344*	Membership in the dyadic fractions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤs ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s 𝐴 = (𝑥 /su (2s↑s𝑦)))
Theorem	zs12ex 28345	The class of dyadic fractions is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ℤs[1/2] ∈ V
Theorem	zzs12 28346	A surreal integer is a dyadic fraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs → 𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	zs12negscl 28347	The dyadics are closed under negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	zs12negsclb 28348	A surreal is a dyadic fraction iff its negative is. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤs[1/2]))
Theorem	zs12ge0 28349*	An expression for non-negative dyadic rationals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s ≤s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝐴 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝))))
Theorem	zs12bday 28350	A dyadic fraction has a finite birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω)
15.6.6  Real numbers
Syntax	creno 28351	Declare the syntax for the surreal reals.
class ℝs
Definition	df-reno 28352*	Define the surreal reals. These are the finite numbers without any infintesimal parts. Definition from [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ℝs = {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑛) <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝑛) ∧ 𝑥 = ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑦 = (𝑥 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} |s {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑦 = (𝑥 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))}))}
Theorem	elreno 28353*	Membership in the set of surreal reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs ↔ (𝐴 ∈ No ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑛) <s 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑛) ∧ 𝐴 = ({𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} |s {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))}))))
Theorem	recut 28354*	The cut involved in defining surreal reals is a genuine cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} <<s {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))})
Theorem	0reno 28355	Surreal zero is a surreal real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 0s ∈ ℝs
Theorem	renegscl 28356	The surreal reals are closed under negation. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝs)
Theorem	readdscl 28357	The surreal reals are closed under addition. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝs ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝs) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ ℝs)
Theorem	remulscllem1 28358*	Lemma for remulscl 28360. Split a product of reciprocals of naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑝 ∈ ℕs ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕs 𝐴 = (𝐵𝐹(( 1s /su 𝑝) ·s ( 1s /su 𝑞))) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝐴 = (𝐵𝐹( 1s /su 𝑛)))
Theorem	remulscllem2 28359*	Lemma for remulscl 28360. Bound 𝐴 and 𝐵 above and below. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕs ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕs) ∧ ((( -us ‘𝑁) <s 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑁) ∧ (( -us ‘𝑀) <s 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <s 𝑀)))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑝) <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) <s 𝑝))
Theorem	remulscl 28360	The surreal reals are closed under multiplication. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝs ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝs) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ ℝs)
PART 16  ELEMENTARY GEOMETRY This part develops elementary geometry based on Tarski's axioms, following [Schwabhauser]. Tarski's geometry is a first-order theory with one sort, the "points". It has two primitive notions, the ternary predicate of "betweenness" and the quaternary predicate of "congruence". To adapt this theory to the framework of set.mm, and to be able to talk of *a* Tarski structure as a space satisfying the given axioms, we use the following definition, stated informally: A Tarski structure 𝑓 is a set (of points) (Base‘𝑓) together with functions (Itv‘𝑓) and (dist‘𝑓) on ((Base‘𝑓) × (Base‘𝑓)) satisfying certain axioms (given in Definitions df-trkg 28387 et sequentes). This allows to treat a Tarski structure as a special kind of extensible structure (see df-struct 17124). The translation to and from Tarski's treatment is as follows (given, again, informally). Suppose that one is given an extensible structure 𝑓. One defines a betweenness ternary predicate Btw by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Btw 𝑥𝑦𝑧 " if and only if 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥(Itv‘𝑓)𝑧, and a congruence quaternary predicate Congr by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑡 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡 " if and only if 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡. It is easy to check that if 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms, then Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when (Base‘𝑓) is interpreted as the universe of discourse. Conversely, suppose that one is given a set 𝑎, a ternary predicate Btw, and a quaternary predicate Congr. One defines the extensible structure 𝑓 such that (Base‘𝑓) is 𝑎, and (Itv‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of points 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 such that "Btw 𝑥𝑧𝑦", and (dist‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of ordered pairs ⟨𝑧, 𝑡⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) such that "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡". It is easy to check that if Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when 𝑎 is interpreted as the universe of discourse, then 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms. We intentionally choose to represent congruence (without loss of generality) as 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡 instead of "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡", as it is more convenient. It is always possible to define dist for any particular geometry to produce equal results when congruence is desired, and in many cases there is an obvious interpretation of "distance" between two points that can be useful in other situations. Encoding congruence as an equality of distances makes it easier to use these theorems in cases where there is a preferred distance function. We prove that representing a congruence relationship using a distance in the form 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡 causes no loss of generality in tgjustc1 28409 and tgjustc2 28410, which in turn are supported by tgjustf 28407 and tgjustr 28408. A similar representation of congruence (using a "distance" function) is used in Axiom A1 of [Beeson2016] p. 5, which discusses how a large number of formalized proofs were found in Tarskian Geometry using OTTER. Their detailed proofs in Tarski Geometry, along with other information, are available at https://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/FormalTarski/ 28408. Most theorems are in deduction form, as this is a very general, simple, and convenient format to use in Metamath. An assertion in deduction form can be easily converted into an assertion in inference form (removing the antecedents 𝜑 →) by insert a ⊤ → in each hypothesis, using a1i 11, then using mptru 1547 to remove the final ⊤ → prefix. In some cases we represent, without loss of generality, an implication antecedent in [Schwabhauser] as a hypothesis. The implication can be retrieved from the by using simpr 484, the theorem as stated, and ex 412. For descriptions of individual axioms, we refer to the specific definitions below. A particular feature of Tarski's axioms is modularity, so by using various subsets of the set of axioms, we can define the classes of "absolute dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkg 28387), of "Euclidean dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkge 28385) and of "Tarski structures of dimension no less than N" (df-trkgld 28386). In this system, angles are not a primitive notion, but instead a derived notion (see df-cgra 28742 and iscgra 28743). To maintain its simplicity, in this system congruence between shapes (a finite sequence of points) is the case where corresponding segments between all corresponding points are congruent. This includes triangles (a shape of 3 distinct points). Note that this definition has no direct regard for angles. For more details and rationale, see df-cgrg 28445. The first section is devoted to the definitions of these various structures. The second section ("Tarskian geometry") develops the synthetic treatment of geometry. The remaining sections prove that real Euclidean spaces and complex Hilbert spaces, with intended interpretations, are Euclidean Tarski structures. Most of the work in this part is due to Thierry Arnoux, with earlier work by Mario Carneiro and Scott Fenton. See also the credits in the comment of each statement.
16.1  Definition and Tarski's Axioms of Geometry
Syntax	cstrkg 28361	Extends class notation with the class of Tarski geometries.
class TarskiG
Syntax	cstrkgc 28362	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms.
class TarskiGC
Syntax	cstrkgb 28363	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the betweenness axioms.
class TarskiGB
Syntax	cstrkgcb 28364	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence and betweenness axioms.
class TarskiGCB
Syntax	cstrkgld 28365	Extends class notation with the relation for geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axioms.
class DimTarskiG≥
Syntax	cstrkge 28366	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom.
class TarskiGE
Syntax	citv 28367	Declare the syntax for the Interval (segment) index extractor.
class Itv
Syntax	clng 28368	Declare the syntax for the Line function.
class LineG
Definition	df-itv 28369	Define the Interval (segment) index extractor for Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) Use its index-independent form itvid 28373 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Itv = Slot ;16
Definition	df-lng 28370	Define the line index extractor for geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) Use its index-independent form lngid 28374 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ LineG = Slot ;17
Theorem	itvndx 28371	Index value of the Interval (segment) slot. Use ndxarg 17173. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Itv‘ndx) = ;16
Theorem	lngndx 28372	Index value of the "line" slot. Use ndxarg 17173. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (LineG‘ndx) = ;17
Theorem	itvid 28373	Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-itv 28369. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ Itv = Slot (Itv‘ndx)
Theorem	lngid 28374	Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-lng 28370. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.)
⊢ LineG = Slot (LineG‘ndx)
Theorem	slotsinbpsd 28375	The slots Base, +g, ·𝑠 and dist are different from the slot Itv. Formerly part of ttglem 28810 and proofs using it. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (((Itv‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx) ∧ (Itv‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)) ∧ ((Itv‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (Itv‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx)))
Theorem	slotslnbpsd 28376	The slots Base, +g, ·𝑠 and dist are different from the slot LineG. Formerly part of ttglem 28810 and proofs using it. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (((LineG‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx) ∧ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)) ∧ ((LineG‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx)))
Theorem	lngndxnitvndx 28377	The slot for the line is not the slot for the Interval (segment) in an extensible structure. Formerly part of proof for ttgval 28809. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx)
Theorem	trkgstr 28378	Functionality of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑊 Struct ⟨1, ;16⟩
Theorem	trkgbas 28379	The base set of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑊))
Theorem	trkgdist 28380	The measure of a distance in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊))
Theorem	trkgitv 28381	The congruence relation in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊))
Definition	df-trkgc 28382*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms of reflexivity, identity and transitivity. These are axioms A1 to A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. With our distance based notation for congruence, transitivity of congruence boils down to transitivity of equality and is already given by eqtr 2750, so it is not listed in this definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ TarskiGC = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑦𝑑𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑧𝑑𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))}
Definition	df-trkgb 28383*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the 3 betweenness axioms in Tarski's Axiomatization of Geometry: identity, Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, axiom of Pasch, Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and continuity, Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ TarskiGB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝑖𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝑖𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦)))}
Definition	df-trkgcb 28384*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the five segment axiom, Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, and segment construction axiom, Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ TarskiGCB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑏𝑑𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑎𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑏𝑑𝑣)))) → (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑐𝑑𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏)))}
Definition	df-trkge 28385*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom, Axiom A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ TarskiGE = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑣) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑢) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑎) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑏) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑏)))}
Definition	df-trkgld 28386*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom for dimension 𝑛. For such geometries, there are three non-colinear points that are equidistant from 𝑛 − 1 distinct points. Derived from remarks in Tarski's System of Geometry, Alfred Tarski and Steven Givant, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Volume 5, Number 2 (1999), 175-214. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ DimTarskiG≥ = {⟨𝑔, 𝑛⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑓(𝑓:(1..^𝑛)–1-1→𝑝 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (∀𝑗 ∈ (2..^𝑛)(((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑥) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑥) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑦) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑧) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))}
Definition	df-trkg 28387*	Define the class of Tarski geometries. A Tarski geometry is a set of points, equipped with a betweenness relation (denoting that a point lies on a line segment between two other points) and a congruence relation (denoting equality of line segment lengths). Here, we are using the following: for congruence, (𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑧 − 𝑤) where − = (dist‘𝑊) for betweenness, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧), where 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊) With this definition, the axiom A2 is actually equivalent to the transitivity of equality, eqtrd 2765. Tarski originally had more axioms, but later reduced his list to 11: A1 A kind of reflexivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A2 Transitivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A3 Identity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A4 Axiom of segment construction (TarskiGCB) A5 5-segment axiom (TarskiGCB) A6 Identity for the betweenness relation (TarskiGB) A7 Axiom of Pasch (TarskiGB) A8 Lower dimension axiom (◡DimTarskiG≥ “ {2}) A9 Upper dimension axiom (V ∖ (◡DimTarskiG≥ “ {3})) A10 Euclid's axiom (TarskiGE) A11 Axiom of continuity (TarskiGB) Our definition is split into 5 parts: congruence axioms TarskiGC (which metric spaces fulfill) betweenness axioms TarskiGB congruence and betweenness axioms TarskiGCB upper and lower dimension axioms DimTarskiG≥ axiom of Euclid / parallel postulate TarskiGE So our definition of a Tarskian Geometry includes the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation (A1, A2, A3), the 3 axioms for the ternary betweenness relation (A6, A7, A11), and the 2 axioms of compatibility of the congruence and the betweenness relations (A4,A5). It does not include Euclid's axiom A10, nor the 2-dimensional axioms A8 (Lower dimension axiom) and A9 (Upper dimension axiom) so the number of dimensions of the geometry it formalizes is not constrained. Considering A2 as one of the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation is somewhat conventional, because the transitivity of the congruence relation is automatically given by our choice to take the distance as this congruence relation in our definition of Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ TarskiG = ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}))
Theorem	istrkgc 28388*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑦 − 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑧 − 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
Theorem	istrkgb 28389*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝐼𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝐼𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝐼𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦)))))
Theorem	istrkgcb 28390*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence and betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGCB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑎 − 𝑏) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑎 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑏 − 𝑣)))) → (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑐 − 𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑎 − 𝑏)))))
Theorem	istrkge 28391*	Property of fulfilling Euclid's axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑣) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (𝑦𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑢) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑎) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑏) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏)))))
Theorem	istrkgl 28392*	Building lines from the segment property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})} ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (LineG‘𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})))
Theorem	istrkgld 28393*	Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 𝑁 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥𝑁 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1..^𝑁)–1-1→𝑃 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (∀𝑗 ∈ (2..^𝑁)(((𝑓‘1) − 𝑥) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑓‘1) − 𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑓‘1) − 𝑧) = ((𝑓‘𝑗) − 𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))))))
Theorem	istrkg2ld 28394*	Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 2 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥2 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))))
Theorem	istrkg3ld 28395*	Property of fulfilling the lower dimension 3 axiom. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺DimTarskiG≥3 ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝑢 − 𝑥) = (𝑣 − 𝑥) ∧ (𝑢 − 𝑦) = (𝑣 − 𝑦) ∧ (𝑢 − 𝑧) = (𝑣 − 𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))))))
Theorem	axtgcgrrflx 28396	Axiom of reflexivity of congruence, Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑌 − 𝑋))
Theorem	axtgcgrid 28397	Axiom of identity of congruence, Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝑍 − 𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	axtgsegcon 28398*	Axiom of segment construction, Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. As discussed in Axiom 4 of [Tarski1999] p. 178, "The intuitive content [is that] given any line segment 𝐴𝐵, one can construct a line segment congruent to it, starting at any point 𝑌 and going in the direction of any ray containing 𝑌. The ray is determined by the point 𝑌 and a second point 𝑋, the endpoint of the ray. The other endpoint of the line segment to be constructed is just the point 𝑧 whose existence is asserted." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧) ∧ (𝑌 − 𝑧) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	axtg5seg 28399	Five segments axiom, Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. Take two triangles 𝑋𝑍𝑈 and 𝐴𝐶𝑉, a point 𝑌 on 𝑋𝑍, and a point 𝐵 on 𝐴𝐶. If all corresponding line segments except for 𝑍𝑈 and 𝐶𝑉 are congruent ( i.e., 𝑋𝑌 ∼ 𝐴𝐵, 𝑌𝑍 ∼ 𝐵𝐶, 𝑋𝑈 ∼ 𝐴𝑉, and 𝑌𝑈 ∼ 𝐵𝑉), then 𝑍𝑈 and 𝐶𝑉 are also congruent. As noted in Axiom 5 of [Tarski1999] p. 178, "this axiom is similar in character to the well-known theorems of Euclidean geometry that allow one to conclude, from hypotheses about the congruence of certain corresponding sides and angles in two triangles, the congruence of other corresponding sides and angles." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑈) = (𝐴 − 𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑈) = (𝐵 − 𝑉))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑈) = (𝐶 − 𝑉))
Theorem	axtgbtwnid 28400	Identity of Betweenness. Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)