Theorem uspgrupgrushgr 26476

Description: A graph is a simple pseudograph iff it is a pseudograph and a simple hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 30-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uspgrupgrushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Proof of Theorem uspgrupgrushgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uspgrupgr 26475	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)
2		uspgrushgr 26474	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph)
3	1, 2	jca 509	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))
4		eqid 2825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	ushgrf 26361	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
7		edgval 26347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
8		upgredgss 26430	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
9	7, 8	syl5eqssr 3875	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
10		f1ssr 6344	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
11	6, 9, 10	syl2anr 592	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
12	4, 5	isuspgr 26451	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
13	12	adantr 474	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
14	11, 13	mpbird 249	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
15	3, 14	impbii 201	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   ∈ wcel 2166  {crab 3121   ∖ cdif 3795   ⊆ wss 3798  ∅c0 4144  𝒫 cpw 4378  {csn 4397   class class class wbr 4873  dom cdm 5342  ran crn 5343  –1-1→wf1 6120  ‘cfv 6123   ≤ cle 10392  2c2 11406  ♯chash 13410  Vtxcvtx 26294  iEdgciedg 26295  Edgcedg 26345  USHGraphcushgr 26355  UPGraphcupgr 26378  USPGraphcuspgr 26447

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-8 2168  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803  ax-sep 5005  ax-nul 5013  ax-pow 5065  ax-pr 5127  ax-un 7209

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-sbc 3663  df-csb 3758  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-pw 4380  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-op 4404  df-uni 4659  df-br 4874  df-opab 4936  df-mpt 4953  df-id 5250  df-xp 5348  df-rel 5349  df-cnv 5350  df-co 5351  df-dm 5352  df-rn 5353  df-iota 6086  df-fun 6125  df-fn 6126  df-f 6127  df-f1 6128  df-fv 6131  df-edg 26346  df-ushgr 26357  df-upgr 26380  df-uspgr 26449

This theorem is referenced by: (None)