Theorem uspgrupgrushgr 29158

Description: A graph is a simple pseudograph iff it is a pseudograph and a simple hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 30-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uspgrupgrushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Proof of Theorem uspgrupgrushgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uspgrupgr 29157	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)
2		uspgrushgr 29156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))
4		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	ushgrf 29042	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
7		edgval 29028	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
8		upgredgss 29111	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
9	7, 8	eqsstrrid 3998	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
10		f1ssr 6780	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
11	6, 9, 10	syl2anr 597	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
12	4, 5	isuspgr 29131	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
13	12	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
14	11, 13	mpbird 257	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
15	3, 14	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3415   ∖ cdif 3923   ⊆ wss 3926  ∅c0 4308  𝒫 cpw 4575  {csn 4601   class class class wbr 5119  dom cdm 5654  ran crn 5655  –1-1→wf1 6528  ‘cfv 6531   ≤ cle 11270  2c2 12295  ♯chash 14348  Vtxcvtx 28975  iEdgciedg 28976  Edgcedg 29026  USHGraphcushgr 29036  UPGraphcupgr 29059  USPGraphcuspgr 29127

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-sbc 3766  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-pw 4577  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-op 4608  df-uni 4884  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-id 5548  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fv 6539  df-edg 29027  df-ushgr 29038  df-upgr 29061  df-uspgr 29129

This theorem is referenced by: (None)