Theorem uspgrupgrushgr 27558

Description: A graph is a simple pseudograph iff it is a pseudograph and a simple hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 30-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uspgrupgrushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Proof of Theorem uspgrupgrushgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uspgrupgr 27557	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)
2		uspgrushgr 27556	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph)
3	1, 2	jca 512	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))
4		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	ushgrf 27444	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
7		edgval 27430	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
8		upgredgss 27513	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
9	7, 8	eqsstrrid 3975	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
10		f1ssr 6675	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
11	6, 9, 10	syl2anr 597	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
12	4, 5	isuspgr 27533	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
13	12	adantr 481	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
14	11, 13	mpbird 256	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
15	3, 14	impbii 208	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2110  {crab 3070   ∖ cdif 3889   ⊆ wss 3892  ∅c0 4262  𝒫 cpw 4539  {csn 4567   class class class wbr 5079  dom cdm 5590  ran crn 5591  –1-1→wf1 6429  ‘cfv 6432   ≤ cle 11021  2c2 12039  ♯chash 14055  Vtxcvtx 27377  iEdgciedg 27378  Edgcedg 27428  USHGraphcushgr 27438  UPGraphcupgr 27461  USPGraphcuspgr 27529

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5227  ax-nul 5234  ax-pr 5356  ax-un 7583

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2072  df-mo 2542  df-eu 2571  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2818  df-nfc 2891  df-ral 3071  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3075  df-v 3433  df-sbc 3721  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909  df-nul 4263  df-if 4466  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4846  df-br 5080  df-opab 5142  df-mpt 5163  df-id 5490  df-xp 5596  df-rel 5597  df-cnv 5598  df-co 5599  df-dm 5600  df-rn 5601  df-iota 6390  df-fun 6434  df-fn 6435  df-f 6436  df-f1 6437  df-fv 6440  df-edg 27429  df-ushgr 27440  df-upgr 27463  df-uspgr 27531

This theorem is referenced by: (None)