Theorem uspgrupgrushgr 29214

Description: A graph is a simple pseudograph iff it is a pseudograph and a simple hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 30-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uspgrupgrushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Proof of Theorem uspgrupgrushgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uspgrupgr 29213	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)
2		uspgrushgr 29212	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))
4		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	ushgrf 29098	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
7		edgval 29084	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
8		upgredgss 29167	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
9	7, 8	eqsstrrid 4058	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
10		f1ssr 6823	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
11	6, 9, 10	syl2anr 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
12	4, 5	isuspgr 29187	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
13	12	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
14	11, 13	mpbird 257	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
15	3, 14	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3443   ∖ cdif 3973   ⊆ wss 3976  ∅c0 4352  𝒫 cpw 4622  {csn 4648   class class class wbr 5166  dom cdm 5700  ran crn 5701  –1-1→wf1 6570  ‘cfv 6573   ≤ cle 11325  2c2 12348  ♯chash 14379  Vtxcvtx 29031  iEdgciedg 29032  Edgcedg 29082  USHGraphcushgr 29092  UPGraphcupgr 29115  USPGraphcuspgr 29183

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-fv 6581  df-edg 29083  df-ushgr 29094  df-upgr 29117  df-uspgr 29185

This theorem is referenced by: (None)