Theorem uspgrupgrushgr 29211

Description: A graph is a simple pseudograph iff it is a pseudograph and a simple hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 30-Nov-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
uspgrupgrushgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Proof of Theorem uspgrupgrushgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uspgrupgr 29210	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)
2		uspgrushgr 29209	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph)
3	1, 2	jca 511	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))
4		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
5		eqid 2735	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
6	4, 5	ushgrf 29095	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
7		edgval 29081	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Edg‘𝐺) = ran (iEdg‘𝐺)
8		upgredgss 29164	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
9	7, 8	eqsstrrid 4045	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
10		f1ssr 6811	. . . 4 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ ran (iEdg‘𝐺) ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
11	6, 9, 10	syl2anr 597	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2})
12	4, 5	isuspgr 29184	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
13	12	adantr 480	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∣ (♯‘𝑥) ≤ 2}))
14	11, 13	mpbird 257	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph) → 𝐺 ∈ USPGraph)
15	3, 14	impbii 209	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ↔ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐺 ∈ USHGraph))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2106  {crab 3433   ∖ cdif 3960   ⊆ wss 3963  ∅c0 4339  𝒫 cpw 4605  {csn 4631   class class class wbr 5148  dom cdm 5689  ran crn 5690  –1-1→wf1 6560  ‘cfv 6563   ≤ cle 11294  2c2 12319  ♯chash 14366  Vtxcvtx 29028  iEdgciedg 29029  Edgcedg 29079  USHGraphcushgr 29089  UPGraphcupgr 29112  USPGraphcuspgr 29180

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5583  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fv 6571  df-edg 29080  df-ushgr 29091  df-upgr 29114  df-uspgr 29182

This theorem is referenced by: (None)