P. 291 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29001-29100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	tgsss3 29001	Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	dfcgrg2 29002	Congruence for two triangles can also be defined as congruence of sides and angles (6 parts). This is often the actual textbook definition of triangle congruence, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#Congruence_of_triangles. With this definition, the "SSS" congruence theorem has an additional part, namely, that triangle congruence implies congruence of the sides (which means equality of the lengths). Because our development of elementary geometry strives to closely follow Schwabhaeuser's, our original definition of shape congruence, df-cgrg 28650, already covers that part: see trgcgr 28655. This theorem is also named "CPCTC", which stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#CPCTC 28655. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ∧ (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐶𝐴𝐵”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐷𝐸”⟩ ∧ ⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐸𝐹𝐷”⟩))))
Theorem	isoas 29003	Congruence theorem for isocele triangles: if two angles of a triangle are congruent, then the corresponding sides also are. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐵”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐶))
16.2.19  Equilateral triangles
Syntax	ceqlg 29004	Declare the class of equilateral triangles.
class eqltrG
Definition	df-eqlg 29005*	Define the class of equilateral triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ eqltrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∣ 𝑥(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“(𝑥‘1)(𝑥‘2)(𝑥‘0)”⟩})
Theorem	iseqlg 29006	Property of a triangle being equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺) ↔ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐵𝐶𝐴”⟩))
Theorem	iseqlgd 29007	Condition for a triangle to be equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐶 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺))
16.3  Properties of geometries
16.3.1  Isomorphisms between geometries
Theorem	f1otrgds 29008*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 29010. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	f1otrgitv 29009*	Convenient lemma for f1otrg 29010. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑌))))
Theorem	f1otrg 29010*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (LineG‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiG)
Theorem	f1otrge 29011*	A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also the property of being a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiGE)
16.4  Geometry in Hilbert spaces
Syntax	cttg 29012	Function to convert an algebraic structure to a Tarski geometry.
class toTG
Definition	df-ttg 29013*	Define a function converting a subcomplex Hilbert space to a Tarski Geometry. It does so by equipping the structure with a betweenness operation. Note that because the scalar product is applied over the interval (0[,]1), only spaces whose scalar field is a superset of that interval can be considered. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.)
⊢ toTG = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧(-g‘𝑤)𝑥) = (𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)(𝑦(-g‘𝑤)𝑥))}) / 𝑖⦌((𝑤 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝑖⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})⟩))
Theorem	ttgval 29014*	Define a function to augment a subcomplex Hilbert space with betweenness and a line definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 = ((𝐻 sSet ⟨(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})⟩) sSet ⟨(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})⟩) ∧ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})))
Theorem	ttglem 29015	Lemma for ttgbas 29016, ttgvsca 29019 etc. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (LineG‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘𝐻) = (𝐸‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgbas 29016	The base set of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgplusg 29017	The addition operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgsub 29018	The subtraction operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgvsca 29019	The scalar product of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgds 29020	The metric of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺)
Theorem	ttgitvval 29021*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑋𝐼𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))})
Theorem	ttgelitv 29022*	Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑍 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))))
Theorem	ttgbtwnid 29023	Any subcomplex module equipped with the betweenness operation fulfills the identity of betweenness (Axiom A6). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	ttgcontlem1 29024	Lemma for % ttgcont . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂVec)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (𝑀 / 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0[,]1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0[,]𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝐾 · (𝑌 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑀 · (𝑁 − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 + (𝐿 · (𝑁 − 𝐴))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))
Theorem	xmstrkgc 29025	Any metric space fulfills Tarski's geometry axioms of congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ ∞MetSp → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC)
16.4.1  Geometry in the complex plane
Theorem	cchhllem 29026*	Lemma for chlbas and chlvsca . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) sSet ⟨(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · (∗‘𝑦)))⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ⊢ (·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ℂfld) = (𝐸‘𝐶)
16.4.2  Geometry in Euclidean spaces
16.4.2.1  Definition of the Euclidean space
Syntax	cee 29027	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean space generator.
class 𝔼
Syntax	cbtwn 29028	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate.
class Btwn
Syntax	ccgr 29029	Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate.
class Cgr
Definition	df-ee 29030	Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 29033. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑛)))
Definition	df-btwn 29031*	Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 29039. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Btwn = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))}
Definition	df-cgr 29032*	Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 29040. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Cgr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))}
Theorem	elee 29033	Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ))
Theorem	mptelee 29034*	A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by SN, 2-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	mpteleeOLD 29035*	Obsolete version of mptelee 29034 as of 2-Feb-2026. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	eleenn 29036	If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	eleei 29037	The forward direction of elee 29033. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	eedimeq 29038	A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	brbtwn 29039*	The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	brcgr 29040*	The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))
Theorem	fveere 29041	The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	fveecn 29042	The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	eqeefv 29043*	Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖)))
Theorem	eqeelen 29044*	Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0))
Theorem	brbtwn2 29045*	Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	colinearalglem1 29046	Lemma for colinearalg 29050. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem2 29047*	Lemma for colinearalg 29050. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem3 29048*	Lemma for colinearalg 29050. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	colinearalglem4 29049*	Lemma for colinearalg 29050. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0))
Theorem	colinearalg 29050*	An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 29045. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	eleesub 29051*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	eleesubd 29052*	Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 29051. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
16.4.2.2  Tarski's axioms for geometry for the Euclidean space
Theorem	axdimuniq 29053	The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀)
Theorem	axcgrrflx 29054	𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐵 is from 𝐴. Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩)
Theorem	axcgrtr 29055	Congruence is transitive. Axiom A2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	axcgrid 29056	If there is no distance between 𝐴 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	axsegconlem1 29057*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Handle the degenerate case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)(∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑥‘𝑖))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝑥‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2)))
Theorem	axsegconlem2 29058*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the square of the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axsegconlem3 29059*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the square of the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ 𝑆)
Theorem	axsegconlem4 29060*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the distance between two points is a real number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (√‘𝑆) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axsegconlem5 29061*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the distance between two points is nonnegative. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 0 ≤ (√‘𝑆))
Theorem	axsegconlem6 29062*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the distance between two distinct points is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 0 < (√‘𝑆))
Theorem	axsegconlem7 29063*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that a particular ratio of distances is in the closed unit interval. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) ∈ (0[,]1))
Theorem	axsegconlem8 29064*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that a particular mapping generates a point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axsegconlem9 29065*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that 𝐵𝐹 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐹‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2))
Theorem	axsegconlem10 29066*	Lemma for axsegcon 29067. Show that the scaling constant from axsegconlem7 29063 produces the betweenness condition for 𝐴, 𝐵 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑆 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑝) − (𝐵‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = Σ𝑝 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑝) − (𝐷‘𝑝))↑2)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (((((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)) · (𝐵‘𝑘)) − ((√‘𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑘))) / (√‘𝑆)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − ((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇)))) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (((√‘𝑆) / ((√‘𝑆) + (√‘𝑇))) · (𝐹‘𝑖))))
Theorem	axsegcon 29067*	Any segment 𝐴𝐵 can be extended to a point 𝑥 such that 𝐵𝑥 is congruent to 𝐶𝐷. Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))
Theorem	ax5seglem1 29068*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Rexpress a one congruence sum given betweenness. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))↑2) = ((𝑇↑2) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)))
Theorem	ax5seglem2 29069*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Rexpress another congruence sum given betweenness. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) = (((1 − 𝑇)↑2) · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)))
Theorem	ax5seglem3a 29070	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝐷‘𝑗) − (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	ax5seglem3 29071*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Combine congruences for points on a line. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐸‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑆) · (𝐷‘𝑖)) + (𝑆 · (𝐹‘𝑖))))) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐷‘𝑗) − (𝐹‘𝑗))↑2))
Theorem	ax5seglem4 29072*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Given two distinct points, the scaling constant in a betweenness statement is nonzero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝑇 ≠ 0)
Theorem	ax5seglem5 29073*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. If 𝐵 is between 𝐴 and 𝐶, and 𝐴 is distinct from 𝐵, then 𝐴 is distinct from 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2) ≠ 0)
Theorem	ax5seglem6 29074*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Given two line segments that are divided into pieces, if the pieces are congruent, then the scaling constant is the same. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) ∧ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐸‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑆) · (𝐷‘𝑖)) + (𝑆 · (𝐹‘𝑖))))) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → 𝑇 = 𝑆)
Theorem	ax5seglem7 29075	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. An algebraic calculation needed further down the line. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 · ((𝐶 − 𝐷)↑2)) = ((((((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐶)) − 𝐷)↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · ((𝐴 − 𝐶)↑2)) − ((𝐴 − 𝐷)↑2))))
Theorem	ax5seglem8 29076	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Use the weak deduction theorem to eliminate the hypotheses from ax5seglem7 29075. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (𝑇 · ((𝐶 − 𝐷)↑2)) = ((((((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐶)) − 𝐷)↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · ((𝐴 − 𝐶)↑2)) − ((𝐴 − 𝐷)↑2)))))
Theorem	ax5seglem9 29077*	Lemma for ax5seg 29078. Take the calculation in ax5seglem8 29076 and turn it into a series of measurements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐵‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑇) · (𝐴‘𝑖)) + (𝑇 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) → (𝑇 · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2)) = (Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2) + ((1 − 𝑇) · ((𝑇 · Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))↑2)) − Σ𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐷‘𝑗))↑2)))))
Theorem	ax5seg 29078	The five segment axiom. Take two triangles 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, a point 𝐵 on 𝐴𝐶, and a point 𝐹 on 𝐸𝐺. If all corresponding line segments except for 𝐶𝐷 and 𝐺𝐻 are congruent, then so are 𝐶𝐷 and 𝐺𝐻. Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐹 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩)) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	axbtwnid 29079	Points are indivisible. That is, if 𝐴 lies between 𝐵 and 𝐵, then 𝐴 = 𝐵. Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	axpaschlem 29080*	Lemma for axpasch 29081. Set up coefficients used in the proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (0[,]1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (0[,]1)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ (0[,]1)∃𝑝 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑝 = ((1 − 𝑟) · (1 − 𝑇)) ∧ 𝑟 = ((1 − 𝑝) · (1 − 𝑆)) ∧ ((1 − 𝑟) · 𝑇) = ((1 − 𝑝) · 𝑆)))
Theorem	axpasch 29081*	The inner Pasch axiom. Take a triangle 𝐴𝐶𝐸, a point 𝐷 on 𝐴𝐶, and a point 𝐵 extending 𝐶𝐸. Then 𝐴𝐸 and 𝐷𝐵 intersect at some point 𝑥. Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐴⟩)))
Theorem	axlowdimlem1 29082	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Establish a particular constant function as a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((3...𝑁) × {0}):(3...𝑁)⟶ℝ
Theorem	axlowdimlem2 29083	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Show that two sets are disjoint. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((1...2) ∩ (3...𝑁)) = ∅
Theorem	axlowdimlem3 29084	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a union property for an interval of integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → (1...𝑁) = ((1...2) ∪ (3...𝑁)))
Theorem	axlowdimlem4 29085	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a particular constant function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}:(1...2)⟶ℝ
Theorem	axlowdimlem5 29086	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Show that a particular union is a point in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0})) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axlowdimlem6 29087	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Show that three points are non-colinear. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ({⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨2, 0⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ({⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨2, 0⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨2, 1⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ¬ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	axlowdimlem7 29088	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a point in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axlowdimlem8 29089	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Calculate the value of 𝑃 at three. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃‘3) = -1
Theorem	axlowdimlem9 29090	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Calculate the value of 𝑃 away from three. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 3) → (𝑃‘𝐾) = 0)
Theorem	axlowdimlem10 29091	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a family of points in Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axlowdimlem11 29092	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Calculate the value of 𝑄 at its distinguished point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑄‘(𝐼 + 1)) = 1
Theorem	axlowdimlem12 29093	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Calculate the value of 𝑄 away from its distinguished point. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (1...𝑁) ∧ 𝐾 ≠ (𝐼 + 1)) → (𝑄‘𝐾) = 0)
Theorem	axlowdimlem13 29094	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Establish that 𝑃 and 𝑄 are different points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	axlowdimlem14 29095	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Take two possible 𝑄 from axlowdimlem10 29091. They are the same iff their distinguished values are the same. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ({⟨(𝐽 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐽 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1)) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1))) → (𝑄 = 𝑅 → 𝐼 = 𝐽))
Theorem	axlowdimlem15 29096*	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a one-to-one function of points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1)) ↦ if(𝑖 = 1, ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0})), ({⟨(𝑖 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝑖 + 1)}) × {0}))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐹:(1...(𝑁 − 1))–1-1→(𝔼‘𝑁))
Theorem	axlowdimlem16 29097*	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Set up a summation that will help establish distance. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...(𝑁 − 1))) → Σ𝑖 ∈ (3...𝑁)((𝑃‘𝑖)↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (3...𝑁)((𝑄‘𝑖)↑2))
Theorem	axlowdimlem17 29098	Lemma for axlowdim 29101. Establish a congruence result. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({⟨3, -1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {3}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = ({⟨(𝐼 + 1), 1⟩} ∪ (((1...𝑁) ∖ {(𝐼 + 1)}) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ({⟨1, 𝑋⟩, ⟨2, 𝑌⟩} ∪ ((3...𝑁) × {0}))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (2...(𝑁 − 1))) → ⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩Cgr⟨𝑄, 𝐴⟩)
Theorem	axlowdim1 29099*	The lower dimension axiom for one dimension. In any dimension, there are at least two distinct points. Theorem 3.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 32, where it is derived from axlowdim2 29100. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
Theorem	axlowdim2 29100*	The lower two-dimensional axiom. In any space where the dimension is greater than one, there are three non-colinear points. Axiom A8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ¬ (𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∨ 𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∨ 𝑧 Btwn ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))