P. 291 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29001-29100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	spansneleq 29001	Membership relation that implies equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → (span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵})))
Theorem	spansnss 29002	The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	elspansn3 29003	A member of the span of the singleton of a vector is a member of a subspace containing the vector. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elspansn4 29004	A span membership condition implying two vectors belong to the same subspace. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0ℎ)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elspansn5 29005	A vector belonging to both a subspace and the span of the singleton of a vector not in it must be zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0ℎ))
Theorem	spansnss2 29006	The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	normcan 29007	Cancellation-type law that "extracts" a vector 𝐴 from its inner product with a proportional vector 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → (((𝐴 ·ih 𝐵) / ((normℎ‘𝐵)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pjspansn 29008	A projection on the span of a singleton. (The proof ws shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → ((projℎ‘(span‘{𝐴}))‘𝐵) = (((𝐵 ·ih 𝐴) / ((normℎ‘𝐴)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐴))
Theorem	spansnpji 29009	A subset of Hilbert space is orthogonal to the span of the singleton of a projection onto its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(span‘{((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)}))
Theorem	spanunsni 29010	The span of the union of a closed subspace with a singleton equals the span of its union with an orthogonal singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)}))
Theorem	spanpr 29011	The span of a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⊆ (span‘{𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	h1datomi 29012	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1datom 29013	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
19.5.5  Commutes relation for Hilbert lattice elements
Definition	df-cm 29014*	Define the commutes relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20, who uses the notation xCy for "x commutes with y." See cmbri 29021 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ (⊥‘𝑦))))}
Theorem	cmbr 29015	Binary relation expressing 𝐴 commutes with 𝐵. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	pjoml2i 29016	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml3i 29017	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml4i 29018	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml5i 29019	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml6i 29020*	An equivalent of the orthomodular law. Theorem 29.13(e) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	cmbri 29021	Binary relation expressing the commutes relation. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cmcmlem 29022	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 3.4 of [Beran] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmcmi 29023	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmcm2i 29024	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm3i 29025	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmcm4i 29026	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	cmbr2i 29027	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cmcmii 29028	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	cmcm2ii 29029	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	cmcm3ii 29030	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵
Theorem	cmbr3i 29031	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmbr4i 29032	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	lecmi 29033	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	lecmii 29034	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵
Theorem	cmj1i 29035	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmj2i 29036	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmm1i 29037	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmm2i 29038	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmbr3 29039	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cm0 29040	The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmidi 29041	The commutes relation is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	pjoml2 29042	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml3 29043	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵))
Theorem	pjoml5 29044	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm 29045	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	cmcm3 29046	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm2 29047	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	lecm 29048	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
19.5.6  Foulis-Holland theorem
Theorem	fh1 29049	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
Theorem	fh2 29050	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
Theorem	cm2j 29051	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh1i 29052	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh2i 29053	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh3i 29054	Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh4i 29055	Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	cm2ji 29056	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)
Theorem	cm2mi 29057	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their meet. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
19.5.7  Quantum Logic Explorer axioms
Theorem	qlax1i 29058	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	qlax2i 29059	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	qlax3i 29060	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	qlax4i 29061	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	qlax5i 29062	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = 𝐴
Theorem	qlaxr1i 29063	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴
Theorem	qlaxr2i 29064	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶
Theorem	qlaxr4i 29065	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) = (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	qlaxr5i 29066	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)
Theorem	qlaxr3i 29067	A variation of the orthomodular law, showing Cℋ is an orthomodular lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝐶 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐶)) = ((⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
19.5.8  Orthogonal subspaces
Theorem	chscllem1 29068*	Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴)
Theorem	chscllem2 29069*	Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑣 )
Theorem	chscllem3 29070*	Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑁) = (𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝑁))
Theorem	chscllem4 29071*	Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐵)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chscl 29072	The subspace sum of two closed orthogonal spaces is closed. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	osumi 29073	If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. Note that the (countable) Axiom of Choice is used for this proof via pjhth 28824, although "the hard part" of this proof, chscl 29072, requires no choice. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	osumcori 29074	Corollary of osumi 29073. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	osumcor2i 29075	Corollary of osumi 29073, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis that 𝐴 and 𝐵 commute. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	osum 29076	If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	spansnji 29077	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))
Theorem	spansnj 29078	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})))
Theorem	spansnscl 29079	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace is closed. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	sumspansn 29080	The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other vector also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵) ∈ (span‘{𝐴}) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (span‘{𝐴})))
Theorem	spansnm0i 29081	The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → ((span‘{𝐴}) ∩ (span‘{𝐵})) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	nonbooli 29082	A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample demonstrates a condition where ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)) = 0ℋ but (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ 0ℋ. The antecedent specifies that the vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 are nonzero and non-colinear. The last three hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to 𝐹, 𝐺, and 𝐻. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (span‘{𝐴})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (span‘{𝐵})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)})    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)))
Theorem	spansncvi 29083	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶})))
Theorem	spansncv 29084	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))))
19.5.9  Orthoarguesian laws 5OA and 3OA
Theorem	5oalem1 29085	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑅)) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅))))
Theorem	5oalem2 29086	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)))
Theorem	5oalem3 29087	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺))))
Theorem	5oalem4 29088	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)))))
Theorem	5oalem5 29089	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆))) ∧ (((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)) ∧ (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))
Theorem	5oalem6 29090	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ℎ = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ ℎ = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ ℎ = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)))) → ℎ ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))))))
Theorem	5oalem7 29091	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) TODO: replace uses of ee4anv 2320 with 4exdistrv 1999 as in 3oalem3 29095. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))))
Theorem	5oai 29092	Orthoarguesian law 5OA. This 8-variable inference is called 5OA because it can be converted to a 5-variable equation (see Quantum Logic Explorer). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∨ℋ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))))))
Theorem	3oalem1 29093*	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → (((𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℋ) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℋ)))
Theorem	3oalem2 29094*	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))))
Theorem	3oalem3 29095	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆)))))
Theorem	3oalem4 29096	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	3oalem5 29097	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆))
Theorem	3oalem6 29098	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))
Theorem	3oai 29099	3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. Equation IV of [GodowskiGreechie] p. 249. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))
19.5.10  Projectors (cont.)
Theorem	pjorthi 29100	Projection components on orthocomplemented subspaces are orthogonal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐵)) = 0)