![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 291 of 437) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28347) |
![]() (28348-29872) |
![]() (29873-43657) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | spansneleq 29001 | Membership relation that implies equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → (span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnss 29002 | The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elspansn3 29003 | A member of the span of the singleton of a vector is a member of a subspace containing the vector. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elspansn4 29004 | A span membership condition implying two vectors belong to the same subspace. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0ℎ)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | elspansn5 29005 | A vector belonging to both a subspace and the span of the singleton of a vector not in it must be zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | spansnss2 29006 | The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | normcan 29007 | Cancellation-type law that "extracts" a vector 𝐴 from its inner product with a proportional vector 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → (((𝐴 ·ih 𝐵) / ((normℎ‘𝐵)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | pjspansn 29008 | A projection on the span of a singleton. (The proof ws shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → ((projℎ‘(span‘{𝐴}))‘𝐵) = (((𝐵 ·ih 𝐴) / ((normℎ‘𝐴)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | spansnpji 29009 | A subset of Hilbert space is orthogonal to the span of the singleton of a projection onto its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(span‘{((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)})) | ||
Theorem | spanunsni 29010 | The span of the union of a closed subspace with a singleton equals the span of its union with an orthogonal singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)})) | ||
Theorem | spanpr 29011 | The span of a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⊆ (span‘{𝐴, 𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | h1datomi 29012 | A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | h1datom 29013 | A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))) | ||
Definition | df-cm 29014* | Define the commutes relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20, who uses the notation xCy for "x commutes with y." See cmbri 29021 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶ℋ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ (⊥‘𝑦))))} | ||
Theorem | cmbr 29015 | Binary relation expressing 𝐴 commutes with 𝐵. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))))) | ||
Theorem | pjoml2i 29016 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml3i 29017 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml4i 29018 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml5i 29019 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml6i 29020* | An equivalent of the orthomodular law. Theorem 29.13(e) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbri 29021 | Binary relation expressing the commutes relation. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | cmcmlem 29022 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 3.4 of [Beran] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmcmi 29023 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmcm2i 29024 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3i 29025 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmcm4i 29026 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbr2i 29027 | Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | cmcmii 29028 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | cmcm2ii 29029 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3ii 29030 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cmbr3i 29031 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbr4i 29032 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | lecmi 29033 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | lecmii 29034 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cmj1i 29035 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmj2i 29036 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmm1i 29037 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmm2i 29038 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmbr3 29039 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | cm0 29040 | The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmidi 29041 | The commutes relation is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | pjoml2 29042 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml3 29043 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | pjoml5 29044 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm 29045 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3 29046 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm2 29047 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | lecm 29048 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fh1 29049 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | fh2 29050 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | cm2j 29051 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh1i 29052 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh2i 29053 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh3i 29054 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh4i 29055 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cm2ji 29056 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | cm2mi 29057 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their meet. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | qlax1i 29058 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | qlax2i 29059 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | qlax3i 29060 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | qlax4i 29061 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | qlax5i 29062 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr1i 29063 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr2i 29064 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr4i 29065 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) = (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | qlaxr5i 29066 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | qlaxr3i 29067 | A variation of the orthomodular law, showing Cℋ is an orthomodular lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ (𝐶 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐶)) = ((⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | chscllem1 29068* | Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chscllem2 29069* | Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑣 ) | ||
Theorem | chscllem3 29070* | Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑁) = (𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | chscllem4 29071* | Lemma for chscl 29072. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐵)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chscl 29072 | The subspace sum of two closed orthogonal spaces is closed. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | osumi 29073 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. Note that the (countable) Axiom of Choice is used for this proof via pjhth 28824, although "the hard part" of this proof, chscl 29072, requires no choice. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | osumcori 29074 | Corollary of osumi 29073. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | osumcor2i 29075 | Corollary of osumi 29073, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis that 𝐴 and 𝐵 commute. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | osum 29076 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | spansnji 29077 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | spansnj 29078 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnscl 29079 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace is closed. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | sumspansn 29080 | The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other vector also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵) ∈ (span‘{𝐴}) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (span‘{𝐴}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnm0i 29081 | The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → ((span‘{𝐴}) ∩ (span‘{𝐵})) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | nonbooli 29082 | A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample demonstrates a condition where ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)) = 0ℋ but (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ 0ℋ. The antecedent specifies that the vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 are nonzero and non-colinear. The last three hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to 𝐹, 𝐺, and 𝐻. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = (span‘{𝐴}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (span‘{𝐵}) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | spansncvi 29083 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) | ||
Theorem | spansncv 29084 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶})))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem1 29085 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑅)) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅)))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem2 29086 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem3 29087 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem4 29088 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem5 29089 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆))) ∧ (((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)) ∧ (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem6 29090 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ℎ = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ ℎ = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ ℎ = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)))) → ℎ ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem7 29091 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) TODO: replace uses of ee4anv 2320 with 4exdistrv 1999 as in 3oalem3 29095. (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oai 29092 | Orthoarguesian law 5OA. This 8-variable inference is called 5OA because it can be converted to a 5-variable equation (see Quantum Logic Explorer). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∨ℋ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem1 29093* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → (((𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℋ) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℋ))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem2 29094* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆)))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem3 29095 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem4 29096 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem5 29097 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem6 29098 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oai 29099 | 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. Equation IV of [GodowskiGreechie] p. 249. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
Theorem | pjorthi 29100 | Projection components on orthocomplemented subspaces are orthogonal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐵)) = 0) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |