P. 291 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29001-29100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	idmot 29001	The identity is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( I ↾ 𝑃) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	motf1o 29002	Motions are bijections. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	motcl 29003	Closure of motions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	motco 29004	The composition of two motions is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	cnvmot 29005	The converse of a motion is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	motplusg 29006*	The operation for motions is their composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(+g‘𝐼)𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻))
Theorem	motgrp 29007*	The motions of a geometry form a group with respect to function composition, called the Isometry group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Grp)
Theorem	motcgrg 29008*	Property of a motion: distances are preserved. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝐺Ismt𝐺)⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔))⟩}    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝑇) ∼ 𝑇)
Theorem	motcgr3 29009	Property of a motion: distances are preserved, special case of triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐻‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐻‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐻‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
16.2.7  Colinearity
Theorem	tglng 29010*	Lines of a Tarski Geometry. This relates to both Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. and Definition 6.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))}))
Theorem	tglnfn 29011	Lines as functions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 Fn ((𝑃 × 𝑃) ∖ I ))
Theorem	tglnunirn 29012	Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → ∪ ran 𝐿 ⊆ 𝑃)
Theorem	tglnpt 29013	Lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	tglngne 29014	It takes two different points to form a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	tglngval 29015*	The line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑧))})
Theorem	tglnssp 29016	Lines are subset of the geometry base set. That is, lines are sets of points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ⊆ 𝑃)
Theorem	tgellng 29017	Property of lying on the line going through points 𝑋 and 𝑌. Definition 4.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. We choose the notation 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋(LineG‘𝐺)𝑌) instead of "colinear" because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
Theorem	tgcolg 29018	We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
Theorem	btwncolg1 29019	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	btwncolg2 29020	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	btwncolg3 29021	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	colcom 29022	Swapping the points defining a line keeps it unchanged. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑋))
Theorem	colrot1 29023	Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍))
Theorem	colrot2 29024	Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
Theorem	ncolcom 29025	Swapping non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑋))
Theorem	ncolrot1 29026	Rotating non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍))
Theorem	ncolrot2 29027	Rotating non-colinear points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋) ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑋))
Theorem	tgdim01ln 29028	In geometries of dimension less than two, then any three points are colinear. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	ncoltgdim2 29029	If there are three non-colinear points, then the dimension is at least two. Converse of tglowdim2l 29120. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)
Theorem	lnxfr 29030	Transfer law for colinearity. Theorem 4.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	lnext 29031*	Extend a line with a missing point. Theorem 4.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝑐”⟩)
Theorem	tgfscgr 29032	Congruence law for the general five segment configuration. Theorem 4.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑍”⟩ ∼ ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑇) = (𝐴 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑇) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝑇) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
Theorem	lncgr 29033	Congruence rule for lines. Theorem 4.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑋 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐴) = (𝑌 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 − 𝐴) = (𝑍 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lnid 29034	Identity law for points on lines. Theorem 4.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = 𝐴)
Theorem	tgidinside 29035	Law for finding a point inside a segment. Theorem 4.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 = 𝐴)
16.2.8  Connectivity of betweenness
Theorem	tgbtwnconn1lem1 29036	Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 29039. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = 𝐽)
Theorem	tgbtwnconn1lem2 29037	Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 29039. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
Theorem	tgbtwnconn1lem3 29038	Lemma for tgbtwnconn1 29039. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐽))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐷) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐹) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝐻) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 − 𝐽) = (𝐵 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tgbtwnconn1 29039	Connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 39-41. In earlier presentations of Tarski's axioms, this theorem appeared as an additional axiom. It was derived from the other axioms by Gupta, 1965. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷) ∨ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)))
Theorem	tgbtwnconn2 29040	Another connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐷) ∨ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶)))
Theorem	tgbtwnconn3 29041	Inner connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)))
Theorem	tgbtwnconnln3 29042	Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	tgbtwnconn22 29043	Double connectivity law for betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐸))
Theorem	tgbtwnconnln1 29044	Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	tgbtwnconnln2 29045	Derive colinearity from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐿𝐷) ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
16.2.9  Less-than relation in geometric congruences
Syntax	cleg 29046	Less-than relation for geometric congruences.
class ≤G
Definition	df-leg 29047*	Define the less-than relationship between geometric distance congruence classes. See legval 29048. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ≤G = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑓 = (𝑥𝑑𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑥𝑑𝑧)))})
Theorem	legval 29048*	Value of the less-than relationship. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = {⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑓 = (𝑥 − 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑥 − 𝑧)))})
Theorem	legov 29049*	Value of the less-than relationship. Definition 5.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑧 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝑧))))
Theorem	legov2 29050*	An equivalent definition of the less-than relationship. Definition 5.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑥) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
Theorem	legid 29051	Reflexivity of the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	btwnleg 29052	Betweenness implies less-than relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐶))
Theorem	legtrd 29053	Transitivity of the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	legtri3 29054	Equality from the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))
Theorem	legtrid 29055	Trichotomy law for the less-than relationship. Proposition 5.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ≤ (𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	leg0 29056	Degenerated (zero-length) segments are minimal. Proposition 5.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷))
Theorem	legeq 29057	Deduce equality from "less than" null segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	legbtwn 29058	Deduce betweenness from "less than" relation. Corresponds loosely to Proposition 6.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵))
Theorem	tgcgrsub2 29059	Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. In this version the order of points is not known. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹) ∨ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐸)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))
Theorem	ltgseg 29060*	The set 𝐸 denotes the possible values of the congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴 = (𝑥 − 𝑦))
Theorem	ltgov 29061	Strict "shorter than" geometric relation between segments. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )    &   ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ≠ (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
Theorem	legov3 29062	An equivalent definition of the less-than relationship, from the strict relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )    &   ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ↔ ((𝐴 − 𝐵) < (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐶 − 𝐷))))
Theorem	legso 29063	The "shorter than" relation induces an order on pairs. Remark 5.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (≤G‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = ( − “ (𝑃 × 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun − )    &   ⊢ < = (( ≤ ↾ 𝐸) ∖ I )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 × 𝑃) ⊆ dom − )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or 𝐸)
16.2.10  Rays
Syntax	chlg 29064	Function producing the relation "belong to the same half-line".
class hlG
Definition	df-hlg 29065*	Define the function producting the relation "belong to the same half-line". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.)
⊢ hlG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)) ∧ (𝑎 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≠ 𝑐 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ (𝑐(Itv‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑐(Itv‘𝑔)𝑎))))}))
Theorem	ishlg2 29066	Alternate version of ishlg 29069, including closure. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴))))))
Theorem	hlgrcl1 29067	Reverse closure for rays. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	hlgrcl2 29068	Reverse closure for rays. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	ishlg 29069	Rays : Definition 6.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. With this definition, 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 means that 𝐴 and 𝐵 are on the same ray with initial point 𝐶. This follows the same notation as Schwabhauser where rays are first defined as a relation. It is possible to recover the ray itself using e.g., ((𝐾‘𝐶) “ {𝐴}). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐴)))))
Theorem	hlcomb 29070	The half-line relation is symmetric. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐴))
Theorem	hlcomd 29071	The half-line relation is symmetric. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐴)
Theorem	hlne1 29072	The half-line relation implies inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	hlne2 29073	The half-line relation implies inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	hlln 29074	The half-line relation implies colinearity, part of Theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶))
Theorem	hleqnid 29075	The endpoint does not belong to the half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐵)
Theorem	hlid 29076	The half-line relation is reflexive. Theorem 6.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐴)
Theorem	hltr 29077	The half-line relation is transitive. Theorem 6.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	hlbtwn 29078	Betweenness is a sufficient condition to swap half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐷))
Theorem	btwnhl1 29079	Deduce half-line from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐵)
Theorem	btwnhl2 29080	Deduce half-line from betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)
Theorem	btwnhl 29081	Swap betweenness for a half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))
Theorem	lnhl 29082	Either a point 𝐶 on the line AB is on the same side as 𝐴 or on the opposite side. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)))
Theorem	hlcgrex 29083*	Construct a point on a half-line, at a given distance of its origin. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑥) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	hlcgreulem 29084	Lemma for hlcgreu 29085. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑋) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑌) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	hlcgreu 29085*	The point constructed in hlcgrex 29083 is unique. Theorem 6.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷 ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑥) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)))
Theorem	hlcgreq 29086	A constructed point on a half-line, at a given distance of its origin, (see hlcgrex 29083) is unique. Theorem 6.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑋) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑌) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	tghlsub 29087	Removing identical parts from the end of a ray segment preserves congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2026.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐴) = (𝐸 − 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷))
16.2.11  Lines
Theorem	btwnlng1 29088	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	btwnlng2 29089	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	btwnlng3 29090	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	lncom 29091	Swapping the points defining a line keeps it unchanged. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	lnrot1 29092	Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑍𝐿𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	lnrot2 29093	Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))
Theorem	ncolne1 29094	Non-colinear points are different. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	ncolne2 29095	Non-colinear points are different. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2019.) TODO (NM): maybe ncolne2 29095 could be simplified out and deleted, replaced by ncolcom 29025.
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑌𝐿𝑍) ∨ 𝑌 = 𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)
Theorem	tgisline 29096*	The property of being a proper line, generated by two distinct points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 = (𝑥𝐿𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))
Theorem	tglnne 29097	It takes two different points to form a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	tglndim0 29098	There are no lines in dimension 0. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)
Theorem	tgelrnln 29099	The property of being a proper line, generated by two distinct points. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∈ ran 𝐿)
Theorem	tglineeltr 29100	Transitivity law for lines, one half of tglineelsb2 29101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄))