P. 291 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29001-29100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	wwlksext2clwwlk 29001	If a word represents a walk in (in a graph) and there are edges between the last vertex of the word and another vertex and between this other vertex and the first vertex of the word, then the concatenation of the word representing the walk with this other vertex represents a closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 14-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉) → (({(lastS‘𝑊), 𝑍} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑍, (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑍”⟩) ∈ ((𝑁 + 2) ClWWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wwlksubclwwlk 29002	Any prefix of a word representing a closed walk represents a walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1))) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) → (𝑋 prefix 𝑀) ∈ ((𝑀 − 1) WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	clwwnisshclwwsn 29003	Cyclically shifting a closed walk as word of fixed length results in a closed walk as word of the same length (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 22-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) → (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑀) ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	eleclclwwlknlem1 29004*	Lemma 1 for eleclclwwlkn 29020. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)) → ((𝑋 = (𝑌 cyclShift 𝐾) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑍 = (𝑌 cyclShift 𝑚)) → ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑍 = (𝑋 cyclShift 𝑛)))
Theorem	eleclclwwlknlem2 29005*	Lemma 2 for eleclclwwlkn 29020. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑥 cyclShift 𝑘)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑌 = (𝑥 cyclShift 𝑚) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑌 = (𝑋 cyclShift 𝑛)))
Theorem	clwwlknscsh 29006*	The set of cyclical shifts of a word representing a closed walk is the set of closed walks represented by cyclical shifts of a word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)) → {𝑦 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑦 = (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛)} = {𝑦 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑦 = (𝑊 cyclShift 𝑛)})
Theorem	clwwlknccat 29007	The concatenation of two words representing closed walks anchored at the same vertex represents a closed walk with a length which is the sum of the lengths of the two walks. The resulting walk is a "double loop", starting at the common vertex, coming back to the common vertex by the first walk, following the second walk and finally coming back to the common vertex again. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑀 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ (𝐴‘0) = (𝐵‘0)) → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵) ∈ ((𝑀 + 𝑁) ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	umgr2cwwk2dif 29008	If a word represents a closed walk of length at least 2 in a multigraph, the first two symbols of the word must be different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)) → (𝑊‘1) ≠ (𝑊‘0))
Theorem	umgr2cwwkdifex 29009*	If a word represents a closed walk of length at least 2 in a undirected simple graph, the first two symbols of the word must be different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)) → ∃𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)(𝑊‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑊‘0))
Theorem	erclwwlknrel 29010	∼ is a relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel ∼
Theorem	erclwwlkneq 29011*	Two classes are equivalent regarding ∼ if both are words of the same fixed length and one is the other cyclically shifted. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑇 ∼ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑇 = (𝑈 cyclShift 𝑛))))
Theorem	erclwwlkneqlen 29012*	If two classes are equivalent regarding ∼, then they are words of the same length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑇 ∼ 𝑈 → (♯‘𝑇) = (♯‘𝑈)))
Theorem	erclwwlknref 29013*	∼ is a reflexive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ 𝑥 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlknsym 29014*	∼ is a symmetric relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 → 𝑦 ∼ 𝑥)
Theorem	erclwwlkntr 29015*	∼ is a transitive relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∼ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∼ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∼ 𝑧)
Theorem	erclwwlkn 29016*	∼ is an equivalence relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∼ Er 𝑊
Theorem	qerclwwlknfi 29017*	The quotient set of the set of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length according to the equivalence relation ∼ is finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ Fin → (𝑊 / ∼ ) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	hashclwwlkn0 29018*	The number of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length is the sum of the sizes of all equivalence classes according to ∼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ Fin → (♯‘𝑊) = Σ𝑥 ∈ (𝑊 / ∼ )(♯‘𝑥))
Theorem	eclclwwlkn1 29019*	An equivalence class according to ∼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Apr-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝑊 / ∼ ) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑦 = (𝑥 cyclShift 𝑛)}))
Theorem	eleclclwwlkn 29020*	A member of an equivalence class according to ∼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-May-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (𝑊 / ∼ ) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑌 = (𝑋 cyclShift 𝑛))))
Theorem	hashecclwwlkn1 29021*	The size of every equivalence class of the equivalence relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length which is a prime number is 1 or equals this length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (𝑊 / ∼ )) → ((♯‘𝑈) = 1 ∨ (♯‘𝑈) = 𝑁))
Theorem	umgrhashecclwwlk 29022*	The size of every equivalence class of the equivalence relation over the set of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length which is a prime number equals this length (in an undirected simple graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) → (𝑈 ∈ (𝑊 / ∼ ) → (♯‘𝑈) = 𝑁))
Theorem	fusgrhashclwwlkn 29023*	The size of the set of closed walks (defined as words) with a fixed length which is a prime number is the product of the number of equivalence classes for ∼ over the set of closed walks and the fixed length. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 1-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑡 = (𝑢 cyclShift 𝑛))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) → (♯‘𝑊) = ((♯‘(𝑊 / ∼ )) · 𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkndivn 29024	The size of the set of closed walks (defined as words) of length 𝑁 is divisible by 𝑁 if 𝑁 is a prime number. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) → 𝑁 ∥ (♯‘(𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	clwlknf1oclwwlknlem1 29025	Lemma 1 for clwlknf1oclwwlkn 29028. (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝐶))) → (♯‘((2nd ‘𝐶) prefix ((♯‘(2nd ‘𝐶)) − 1))) = (♯‘(1st ‘𝐶)))
Theorem	clwlknf1oclwwlknlem2 29026*	Lemma 2 for clwlknf1oclwwlkn 29028: The closed walks of a positive length are nonempty closed walks of this length. (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2022.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁} = {𝑐 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐)) ∧ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐)) = 𝑁)})
Theorem	clwlknf1oclwwlknlem3 29027*	Lemma 3 for clwlknf1oclwwlkn 29028: The bijective function of clwlknf1oclwwlkn 29028 is the bijective function of clwlkclwwlkf1o 28955 restricted to the closed walks with a fixed positive length. (Contributed by AV, 26-May-2022.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑐)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑐)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐹 = ((𝑐 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ 1 ≤ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤))} ↦ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴))) ↾ 𝐶))
Theorem	clwlknf1oclwwlkn 29028*	There is a one-to-one onto function between the set of closed walks as words of length 𝑁 and the set of closed walks of length 𝑁 in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 1-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (1st ‘𝑐)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (2nd ‘𝑐)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝐵 prefix (♯‘𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→(𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkssizeeq 29029*	The size of the set of closed walks as words of length 𝑁 corresponds to the size of the set of closed walks of length 𝑁 in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 26-May-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (♯‘(𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺)) = (♯‘{𝑤 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑤)) = 𝑁}))
Theorem	clwlksndivn 29030*	The size of the set of closed walks of prime length 𝑁 is divisible by 𝑁. This corresponds to statement 9 in [Huneke] p. 2: "It follows that, if p is a prime number, then the number of closed walks of length p is divisible by p". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ FinUSGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℙ) → 𝑁 ∥ (♯‘{𝑐 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (♯‘(1st ‘𝑐)) = 𝑁}))
17.3.10.3  Closed walks on a vertex of a fixed length as words
Syntax	cclwwlknon 29031	Extend class notation with closed walks (in an undirected graph) anchored at a fixed vertex and of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class ClWWalksNOn
Definition	df-clwwlknon 29032*	Define the set of all closed walks a graph 𝑔, anchored at a fixed vertex 𝑣 (i.e., a walk starting and ending at the fixed vertex 𝑣, also called "a closed walk on vertex 𝑣") and having a fixed length 𝑛 as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence v=p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) of the vertices in a closed walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0)=v as defined in df-clwlks 28719. The set ((𝑣(ClWWalksNOn‘𝑔)𝑛) corresponds to the set of "walks from v to v of length n" in a statement of [Huneke] p. 2. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ClWWalksNOn = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 ClWWalksN 𝑔) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣}))
Theorem	clwwlknonmpo 29033*	(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺) is an operator mapping a vertex 𝑣 and a nonnegative integer 𝑛 to the set of closed walks on 𝑣 of length 𝑛 as words over the set of vertices in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
⊢ (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺) = (𝑣 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺), 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑣})
Theorem	clwwlknon 29034*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 14-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋}
Theorem	isclwwlknon 29035	A word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∧ (𝑊‘0) = 𝑋))
Theorem	clwwlk0on0 29036	There is no word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 0 in a graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)0) = ∅
Theorem	clwwlknon0 29037	Sufficient conditions for ClWWalksNOn to be empty. (Contributed by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (¬ (𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) = ∅)
Theorem	clwwlknonfin 29038	In a finite graph 𝐺, the set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 𝑁 is also finite. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 24-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ Fin → (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	clwwlknonel 29039*	Characterization of a word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk on vertex 𝑋 of (nonzero) length 𝑁 in a graph 𝐺. This theorem would not hold for 𝑁 = 0 if 𝑊 = 𝑋 = ∅. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ≠ 0 → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ↔ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 𝑁 ∧ (𝑊‘0) = 𝑋)))
Theorem	clwwlknonccat 29040	The concatenation of two words representing closed walks on a vertex 𝑋 represents a closed walk on vertex 𝑋. The resulting walk is a "double loop", starting at vertex 𝑋, coming back to 𝑋 by the first walk, following the second walk and finally coming back to 𝑋 again. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑀) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁)) → (𝐴 ++ 𝐵) ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑀 + 𝑁)))
Theorem	clwwlknon1 29041*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 1 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 24-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋𝐶1) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ (𝑤 = ⟨“𝑋”⟩ ∧ {𝑋} ∈ 𝐸)})
Theorem	clwwlknon1loop 29042	If there is a loop at vertex 𝑋, the set of (closed) walks on 𝑋 of length 1 as words over the set of vertices is a singleton containing the singleton word consisting of 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑋} ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑋𝐶1) = {⟨“𝑋”⟩})
Theorem	clwwlknon1nloop 29043	If there is no loop at vertex 𝑋, the set of (closed) walks on 𝑋 of length 1 as words over the set of vertices is empty. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑋} ∉ 𝐸 → (𝑋𝐶1) = ∅)
Theorem	clwwlknon1sn 29044	The set of (closed) walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 1 as words over the set of vertices is a singleton containing the singleton word consisting of 𝑋 iff there is a loop at 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑋𝐶1) = {⟨“𝑋”⟩} ↔ {𝑋} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	clwwlknon1le1 29045	There is at most one (closed) walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 1 as word over the set of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (♯‘(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)1)) ≤ 1
Theorem	clwwlknon2 29046*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 5-Mar-2022.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐶2) = {𝑤 ∈ (2 ClWWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋}
Theorem	clwwlknon2x 29047*	The set of closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2 in a graph 𝐺 as words over the set of vertices, definition of ClWWalksN expanded. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝐶2) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((♯‘𝑤) = 2 ∧ {(𝑤‘0), (𝑤‘1)} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋)}
Theorem	s2elclwwlknon2 29048	Sufficient conditions of a doubleton word to represent a closed walk on vertex 𝑋 of length 2. (Contributed by AV, 11-May-2022.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩ ∈ (𝑋𝐶2))
Theorem	clwwlknon2num 29049	In a 𝐾-regular graph 𝐺, there are 𝐾 closed walks on vertex 𝑋 of length 2. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 25-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐺 RegUSGraph 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (♯‘(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)2)) = 𝐾)
Theorem	clwwlknonwwlknonb 29050	A word over vertices represents a closed walk of a fixed length 𝑁 on vertex 𝑋 iff the word concatenated with 𝑋 represents a walk of length 𝑁 on 𝑋 and 𝑋. This theorem would not hold for 𝑁 = 0 and 𝑊 = ∅, see clwwlknwwlksnb 28999. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2022.) (Revised by AV, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁) ↔ (𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ∈ (𝑋(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑋)))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2lem1 29051	Lemma 1 for clwwlknonex2 29053: Transformation of a special half-open integer range into a union of a smaller half-open integer range and an unordered pair. This Lemma would not hold for 𝑁 = 2, i.e., (♯‘𝑊) = 0, because (0..^(((♯‘𝑊) + 2) − 1)) = (0..^((0 + 2) − 1)) = (0..^1) = {0} ≠ {-1, 0} = (∅ ∪ {-1, 0}) = ((0..^(0 − 1)) ∪ {(0 − 1), 0}) = ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}). (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = (𝑁 − 2)) → (0..^(((♯‘𝑊) + 2) − 1)) = ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2lem2 29052*	Lemma 2 for clwwlknonex2 29053: Transformation of a walk and two edges into a walk extended by two vertices/edges. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ ((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {(lastS‘𝑊), (𝑊‘0)} ∈ 𝐸) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = (𝑁 − 2) ∧ (𝑊‘0) = 𝑋)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → ∀𝑖 ∈ ((0..^((♯‘𝑊) − 1)) ∪ {((♯‘𝑊) − 1), (♯‘𝑊)}){(((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘𝑖), (((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩)‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸)
Theorem	clwwlknonex2 29053	Extending a closed walk 𝑊 on vertex 𝑋 by an additional edge (forth and back) results in a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 25-Feb-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	clwwlknonex2e 29054	Extending a closed walk 𝑊 on vertex 𝑋 by an additional edge (forth and back) results in a closed walk on vertex 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)) ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)(𝑁 − 2))) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩) ++ ⟨“𝑌”⟩) ∈ (𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlknondisj 29055*	The sets of closed walks on different vertices are disjunct. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁)
Theorem	clwwlknun 29056*	The set of closed walks of fixed length 𝑁 in a simple graph 𝐺 is the union of the closed walks of the fixed length 𝑁 on each of the vertices of graph 𝐺. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 28-May-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Mar-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
Theorem	clwwlkvbij 29057*	There is a bijection between the set of closed walks of a fixed length 𝑁 on a fixed vertex 𝑋 represented by walks (as word) and the set of closed walks (as words) of the fixed length 𝑁 on the fixed vertex 𝑋. The difference between these two representations is that in the first case the fixed vertex is repeated at the end of the word, and in the second case it is not. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jul-2022.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((lastS‘𝑤) = (𝑤‘0) ∧ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋)}–1-1-onto→(𝑋(ClWWalksNOn‘𝐺)𝑁))
17.3.11  Examples for walks, trails and paths
Theorem	0ewlk 29058	The empty set (empty sequence of edges) is an s-walk of edges for all s. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0*) → ∅ ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆))
Theorem	1ewlk 29059	A sequence of 1 edge is an s-walk of edges for all s. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ0* ∧ 𝐼 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ⟨“𝐼”⟩ ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆))
Theorem	0wlk 29060	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a walk iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (∅(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	is0wlk 29061	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a sequence of one vertex is a walk (of length 0). (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 = {⟨0, 𝑁⟩} ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ∅(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0wlkonlem1 29062	Lemma 1 for 0wlkon 29064 and 0trlon 29068. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	0wlkonlem2 29063	Lemma 2 for 0wlkon 29064 and 0trlon 29068. (Contributed by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑉 ↑pm (0...0)))
Theorem	0wlkon 29064	A walk of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0wlkons1 29065	A walk of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅(𝑁(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝑁)⟨“𝑁”⟩)
Theorem	0trl 29066	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a trail iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (∅(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	is0trl 29067	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a sequence of one vertex is a trail (of length 0). (Contributed by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 = {⟨0, 𝑁⟩} ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ∅(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0trlon 29068	A trail of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 8-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0pth 29069	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a path iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 19-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0spth 29070	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a simple path iff the second set contains exactly one vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0pthon 29071	A path of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝑁) → ∅(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑃)
Theorem	0pthon1 29072	A path of length 0 from a vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 20-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁){⟨0, 𝑁⟩})
Theorem	0pthonv 29073*	For each vertex there is a path of length 0 from the vertex to itself. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝑁(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑁)𝑝)
Theorem	0clwlk 29074	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a closed walk if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 → (∅(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶𝑉))
Theorem	0clwlkv 29075	Any vertex (more precisely, a pair of an empty set (of edges) and a singleton function to this vertex) determines a closed walk of length 0. (Contributed by AV, 11-Feb-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 = ∅ ∧ 𝑃:{0}⟶{𝑋}) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	0clwlk0 29076	There is no closed walk in the empty set (i.e. the null graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	0crct 29077	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a circuit if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	0cycl 29078	A pair of an empty set (of edges) and a second set (of vertices) is a cycle if and only if the second set contains exactly one vertex (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (∅(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃:(0...0)⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	1pthdlem1 29079	Lemma 1 for 1pthd 29087. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^(♯‘𝐹)))
Theorem	1pthdlem2 29080	Lemma 2 for 1pthd 29087. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 “ {0, (♯‘𝐹)}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^(♯‘𝐹)))) = ∅
Theorem	1wlkdlem1 29081	Lemma 1 for 1wlkd 29085. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
Theorem	1wlkdlem2 29082	Lemma 2 for 1wlkd 29085. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝐽))
Theorem	1wlkdlem3 29083	Lemma 3 for 1wlkd 29085. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
Theorem	1wlkdlem4 29084*	Lemma 4 for 1wlkd 29085. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
Theorem	1wlkd 29085	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1trld 29086	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1pthd 29087	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	1pthond 29088	In a graph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝑋})    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ (𝐼‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1wlkdlem1 29089	Lemma 1 for upgr1wlkd 29091. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋})
Theorem	upgr1wlkdlem2 29090	Lemma 2 for upgr1wlkd 29091. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ⊆ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽))
Theorem	upgr1wlkd 29091	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a walk. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1trld 29092	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a trail. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop). (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1pthd 29093	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgr1pthond 29094	In a pseudograph with two vertices and an edge connecting these two vertices, to go from one vertex to the other vertex via this edge is a path from one of these vertices to the other vertex. The two vertices need not be distinct (in the case of a loop) - in this case, however, the path is not a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“𝐽”⟩    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝐽) = {𝑋, 𝑌})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝑋(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝑌)𝑃)
Theorem	lppthon 29095	A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a path of length 1 from a vertex to itself in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 1-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → ⟨“𝐽”⟩(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐴)⟨“𝐴𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	lp1cycl 29096	A loop (which is an edge at index 𝐽) induces a cycle of length 1 in a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐽 ∈ dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝐼‘𝐽) = {𝐴}) → ⟨“𝐽”⟩(Cycles‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	1pthon2v 29097*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ 𝑒) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	1pthon2ve 29098*	For each pair of adjacent vertices there is a path of length 1 from one vertex to the other in a hypergraph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 22-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝐸) → ∃𝑓∃𝑝 𝑓(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝)
Theorem	wlk2v2elem1 29099	Lemma 1 for wlk2v2e 29101: 𝐹 is a length 2 word of over {0}, the domain of the singleton word 𝐼. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼
Theorem	wlk2v2elem2 29100*	Lemma 2 for wlk2v2e 29101: The values of 𝐼 after 𝐹 are edges between two vertices enumerated by 𝑃. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ⟨“{𝑋, 𝑌}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“00”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“𝑋𝑌𝑋”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}