| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 53 of 164) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dmmptss 5201* | The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | dmmptg 5202* | The domain of the mapping operation is the stated domain, if the function value is always a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relco 5203 | A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfco2 5204* | Alternate definition of a class composition, using only one bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | dfco2a 5205* | Generalization of dfco2 5204, where 𝐶 can have any value between dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵 and V. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ((◡𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | coundi 5206 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | coundir 5207 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cores 5208 | Restricted first member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | resco 5209 | Associative law for the restriction of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | imaco 5210 | Image of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = (𝐴 “ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rnco 5211 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | rnco2 5212 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ ran 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dmco 5213 | The domain of a composition. Exercise 27 of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 “ dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coiun 5214* | Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvcnv1 5215 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (◡◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvcnv2 5216 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ◡◡𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cores2 5217 | Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ ◡(◡𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | co02 5218 | Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | co01 5219 | Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (∅ ∘ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | coi1 5220 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∘ I ) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coi2 5221 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ( I ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | coires1 5222 | Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | coass 5223 | Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvtr 5224 | A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ ◡𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relssdmrn 5225 | A relation is included in the cross product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvssrndm 5226 | The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ ◡𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 × dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cossxp 5227 | Composition as a subset of the cross product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐵 × ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cossxp2 5228 | The composition of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvres 5229 | Restricting a relation and a converse relation when they are composed together. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) = ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑅) ∘ ◡(𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | cocnvss 5230 | Upper bound for the composed of a relation and an inverse relation. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡𝑅) ⊆ (ran (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relrelss 5231 | Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel dom 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) | ||
| Theorem | unielrel 5232 | The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relfld 5233 | The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | relresfld 5234 | Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relcoi2 5235 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | relcoi1 5236 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∘ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | unidmrn 5237 | The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.) |
| ⊢ ∪ ∪ ◡𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvfld 5238 | if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfdm2 5239 | Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4706 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unixpm 5240* | The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | unixp0im 5241 | The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ → ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | cnvexg 5242 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | cnvex 5243 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | relcnvexb 5244 | A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | ressn 5245 | Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | cnviinm 5246* | The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvpom 5247* | The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsom 5248* | The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | coexg 5249 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | coex 5250 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | xpcom 5251* | Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Syntax | cio 5252 | Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota). |
| class (℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iotajust 5253* | Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5254. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}} | ||
| Definition | df-iota 5254* |
Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as
"the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑," where 𝜑
ordinarily contains
𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition
is meaningful only when there
is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 5266);
otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 5270). Russell used
the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent
the binder.
Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 5279 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} | ||
| Theorem | dfiota2 5255* | Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | nfiota1 5256 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfiotadw 5257* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | nfiotaw 5258* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | cbviota 5259 | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotavw 5260* | Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviotav 5261 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotav 5261* | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sb8iota 5262 | Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2070. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iotaeq 5263 | Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | iotabi 5264 | Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | uniabio 5265* | Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | iotaval 5266* | Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | iotauni 5267 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iotaint 5268 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iota1 5269 | Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | iotanul 5270 | Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | euiotaex 5271 | Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iotass 5272* | Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iotaexab 5273 | Existence of the ℩ class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑉 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iota4 5274 | Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota4an 5275 | Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota5 5276* | A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iotabidv 5277* | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | iotabii 5278 | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | iotacl 5279 |
Membership law for descriptions.
This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5254). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iota2df 5280 | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iota2d 5281* | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eliota 5282* | An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | eliotaeu 5283 | An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) → ∃!𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota2 5284* | The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sniota 5285 | A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | iotam 5286* | Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | csbiotag 5287* | Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Syntax | wfun 5288 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.) |
| wff Fun 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | wfn 5289 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf 5290 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf1 5291 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wfo 5292 | Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf1o 5293 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | cfv 5294 | Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.") |
| class (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Syntax | wiso 5295 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-fun 5296 | Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 5326). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 4124 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4126). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5297), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5298), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5299), an onto function (df-fo 5300), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5301). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5304, dffun4 5305, dffun6 5308, dffun7 5321, dffun8 5322, and dffun9 5323. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I )) | ||
| Definition | df-fn 5297 | Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-f 5298 | Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-f1 5299 | Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | ||
| Definition | df-fo 5300 | Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |