Theorem blockadjliftmap 39656

Description: A "two-stage" construction is obtained by first forming the block relation (𝑅 ⋉ ^◡ E ) and then adjoining elements as "BlockAdj". Combined, it uses the relation ((𝑅 ⋉ ^◡ E ) ∪ ^◡ E ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
blockadjliftmap	⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑚,𝑛   𝑅,𝑚,𝑛

Proof of Theorem blockadjliftmap

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfadjliftmap 39654	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↦ [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴))
2		df-mpt 5193	. 2 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↦ [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴))}
3		dmxrnuncnvepres 39590	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∖ {∅})
4	3	eleq2i 2856	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}))
5	4	anbi1i 636	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)))
6		eldifi 4070	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) → 𝑚 ∈ 𝐴)
7		ecuncnvepres 39593	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )))
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) → [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )))
9		ecxrncnvep2 39608	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ V → [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))
10	9	elv 3459	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)
11	10	uneq2i 4167	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))
12	8, 11	eqtrdi 2814	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) → [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)))
13	12	eqeq2d 2774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) → (𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↔ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))))
14	13	pm5.32i 585	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))))
15	5, 14	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))))
16	15	opabbii 5178	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑛 = [𝑚](((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴))} = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)))}
17	1, 2, 16	3eqtri 2790	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)))}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  Vcvv 3454   ∖ cdif 4048   ∪ cun 4152  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588  {copab 5173   ↦ cmpt 5192   E cep 5557   × cxp 5656  ^◡ccnv 5657  dom cdm 5658   ↾ cres 5660  [cec 8753   ⋉ cxrn 39372   AdjLiftMap cadjliftmap 39374

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-eprel 5558  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-fo 6572  df-fv 6574  df-oprab 7455  df-1st 8035  df-2nd 8036  df-ec 8757  df-xrn 39578  df-qmap 39644  df-adjliftmap 39653

This theorem is used by: (None)