Theorem bnj1542 35154

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1542.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
bnj1542.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)
bnj1542.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
bnj1542.4	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1542	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑤,𝐹   𝑤,𝐺,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑤)   𝐴(𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj1542

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1542.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
2		bnj1542.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3		bnj1542.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)
4		eqfnfv 7013	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦)))
5	4	necon3abid 2995	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦)))
6		df-ne 2960	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
7	6	rexbii 3111	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
8		rexnal 3116	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
9	7, 8	bitri 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
10	5, 9	bitr4di 291	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
11	2, 3, 10	syl2anc 593	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
12	1, 11	mpbid 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦))
13		nfv 1936	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥)
14		bnj1542.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)
15	14	nfcii 2915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
16		nfcv 2926	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
17	15, 16	nffv 6879	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
18		nfcv 2926	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐺‘𝑦)
19	17, 18	nfne 3060	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)
20		fveq2 6869	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
21		fveq2 6869	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
22	20, 21	neeq12d 3020	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
23	13, 19, 22	cbvrexw 3307	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦))
24	12, 23	sylibr 236	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1560   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088   Fn wfn 6518  ‘cfv 6523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pr 5392

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-res 5661  df-ima 5662  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fn 6526  df-fv 6531

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1523  35368