Theorem bnj1542 32737

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj1542.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
bnj1542.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)
bnj1542.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
bnj1542.4	⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj1542	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑤,𝐹   𝑤,𝐺,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑤)   𝐴(𝑤)   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj1542

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj1542.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)
2		bnj1542.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3		bnj1542.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)
4		eqfnfv 6891	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦)))
5	4	necon3abid 2979	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦)))
6		df-ne 2943	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
7	6	rexbii 3177	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
8		rexnal 3165	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
9	7, 8	bitri 274	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
10	5, 9	bitr4di 288	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
11	2, 3, 10	syl2anc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≠ 𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
12	1, 11	mpbid 231	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦))
13		nfv 1918	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥)
14		bnj1542.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)
15	14	nfcii 2890	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹
16		nfcv 2906	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦
17	15, 16	nffv 6766	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦)
18		nfcv 2906	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐺‘𝑦)
19	17, 18	nfne 3044	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)
20		fveq2 6756	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
21		fveq2 6756	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑦))
22	20, 21	neeq12d 3004	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦)))
23	13, 19, 22	cbvrexw 3364	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑦))
24	12, 23	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064   Fn wfn 6413  ‘cfv 6418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-fv 6426

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1523  32951