Theorem dffv5 36104

Description: Another quantifier-free definition of function value. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dffv5	⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ ∪ ({(𝐹 “ {𝐴})} ∩ Singletons )

Proof of Theorem dffv5

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dffv3 6836	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴}))
2		dfiota3 36103	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})) = ∪ ∪ ({{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})}} ∩ Singletons )
3		abid2 2873	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})} = (𝐹 “ {𝐴})
4	3	sneqi 4578	. . . . 5 ⊢ {{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})}} = {(𝐹 “ {𝐴})}
5	4	ineq1i 4156	. . . 4 ⊢ ({{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})}} ∩ Singletons ) = ({(𝐹 “ {𝐴})} ∩ Singletons )
6	5	unieqi 4862	. . 3 ⊢ ∪ ({{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})}} ∩ Singletons ) = ∪ ({(𝐹 “ {𝐴})} ∩ Singletons )
7	6	unieqi 4862	. 2 ⊢ ∪ ∪ ({{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹 “ {𝐴})}} ∩ Singletons ) = ∪ ∪ ({(𝐹 “ {𝐴})} ∩ Singletons )
8	1, 2, 7	3eqtri 2763	1 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ ∪ ({(𝐹 “ {𝐴})} ∩ Singletons )

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2714   ∩ cin 3888  {csn 4567  ∪ cuni 4850   “ cima 5634  ℩cio 6452  ‘cfv 6498   Singletons csingles 36019

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-symdif 4193  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5167  df-id 5526  df-eprel 5531  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-f 6502  df-fo 6504  df-fv 6506  df-1st 7942  df-2nd 7943  df-txp 36034  df-singleton 36042  df-singles 36043

This theorem is referenced by:  brapply  36118